Building architectural advantage in the US motion picture industry: Lew Wasserman and the Music Corporation of America

This article contributes to the literature on industry architecture by identifying the conditions that enable the emergence of architectural advantage. To understand how one firm can shape the industry architecture in its favor, we analyzed a historical case study on the role of Lew Wasserman and the Music Corporation of America (MCA) in the evolution of the motion picture industry in the United States. We focused on two major disruptive events: the 1948 Paramount Decree which forced vertically integrated movie studios to divest their theaters, and the explosion of television as a new form of entertainment in the 1950s which became an alternative for exhibiting movies. In both these cases, one company, MCA, managed to improve substantially its standing by occupying and consolidating a position of advantage in the industry or, in other terms, an ‘architectural advantage’. We show how in both cases this was the result of interactions between the Studios, constrained by the institutional logic of the industry, the regulatory framework, and MCA’s introduction of novel practices. The latter consolidated its grip on talents and facilitated the growth of independent production and TV production.

[1]  J. Ricart,et al.  Competing Through Business Models , 2007 .

[2]  M. Jacobides Industry Change Through Vertical Dis-Integration: How and Why Markets Emerged in Mortgage Banking , 2004 .

[3]  W. Sine,et al.  Environmental jolts, institutional change, and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunity in the US electric power industry , 2003 .

[4]  Brandon H. Lee,et al.  Tilting at Windmills? The Environmental Movement and the Emergence of the U.S. Wind Energy Sector , 2009 .

[5]  Brayden G. King,et al.  Social Movements as Extra-Institutional Entrepreneurs: The Effect of Protests on Stock Price Returns , 2007 .

[6]  Murray Smith,et al.  Contemporary Hollywood Cinema , 1998 .

[7]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[8]  Tino Balio Hollywood in the Age of Television , 1993 .

[9]  Dennis Fowler,et al.  The Personal Touch , 2000, NTWK.

[10]  Andrew Hargadon,et al.  When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of the Electric Light , 2001 .

[11]  C. Anderson Hollywood TV: The Studio System in the Fifties , 1994 .

[12]  Mary Tripsas,et al.  Technology, Identity, and Inertia through the Lens of 'The Digital Photography Company' , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[13]  A. Gawer,et al.  Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel , 2005 .

[14]  Francesco Zirpoli,et al.  Product architecture, inter-firm vertical coordination and knowledge partitioning in the auto industry , 2009 .

[15]  A. Pettigrew The Character and Significance of Strategy Process Research , 1992 .

[16]  S. Klepper Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle , 1996 .

[17]  Stephen J. Mezias,et al.  Blind Trust: Market Control, Legal Environments, and the Dynamics of Competitive Intensity in the Early American Film Industry, 1893–1920 , 2005 .

[18]  S. Mezias,et al.  The community dynamics of entrepreneurship: The birth of the american film industry, 1895-1929 , 2001 .

[19]  Tino Balio,et al.  The American Film Industry , 1985 .

[20]  A. Gawer,et al.  Platform Leadership How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation , 2002 .

[21]  John F. Padgett,et al.  Organizational Invention and Elite Transformation: The Birth of Partnership Systems in Renaissance Florence1 , 2006, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  M. Lounsbury,et al.  Vive La Resistance: Competing Logics and the Consolidation of U.S. Community Banking , 2006 .

[23]  D. Gomery The Hollywood Studio System , 1986 .

[24]  Thomas Schatz,et al.  Boom and Bust: American Cinema in the 1940s , 1997 .

[25]  C. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions , 2005 .

[26]  Stefano Brusoni,et al.  Special Issue: Organizational Design: Making Design Rules: A Multidomain Perspective , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[27]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  Paul M. Hirsch,et al.  Social Movements, Field Frames, and Industry Emergence: A Cultural-Political Perspective , 2003 .

[29]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Organizational evolution in a multinational context: entries of automobile manufacturers in Belgium, Britain, France, Germany, and Italy , 1995 .

[30]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[31]  S. Klepper,et al.  Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations , 1982 .

[32]  Pankaj Ghemawat Commitment to a Process Innovation: Nucor, USX, and Thin-Slab Casting , 1993 .

[33]  Michael Storper,et al.  The Effects of Flexible Specialization on Industrial Politics and the Labor Market: The Motion Picture Industry , 1989 .

[34]  A. Kumaraswamy,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE SPONSORSHIP OF COMMON TECHNOLOGICAL STANDARDS: THE CASE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS AND JAVA * , 2002 .

[35]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958– 19901 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[36]  Les K. Adler,et al.  Hollywood on Trial , 1979 .

[37]  Raphael Amit,et al.  Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[38]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[39]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[40]  Alfred Kieser,et al.  Organizational, Institutional, and Societal Evolution: Medieval Craft Guilds and the Genesis of Formal Organizations , 1989 .

[41]  A. Gawer,et al.  Industry architecture as a determinant of successful platform strategies: a case study of the i‐mode mobile Internet service , 2009 .

[42]  Michael J. Enright,et al.  Organization and Coordination in Geographically Concentrated Industries , 1995 .

[43]  John Izod,et al.  Hollywood and the Box Office, 1895-1986 , 1988 .

[44]  G. Cattani,et al.  The Structure of Consensus: Network Ties, Legitimation, and Exit Rates of U.S. Feature Film Producer Organizations , 2008 .

[45]  Douglas Gomery On Hollywood: The Place, The Industry , 2005 .

[46]  M. Jacobides,et al.  The Dynamic Limits of Specialization: Vertical Integration Reconsidered , 2005 .

[47]  Darlene C. Chisholm,et al.  Profit-Sharing Versus Fixed-Payment Contracts: Evidence from the Motion- Pictures Industry , 1997 .

[48]  H. Powdermaker Hollywood, the dream factory , 1979 .

[49]  David M. Waguespack,et al.  Social Structure and Exchange: Self-confirming Dynamics in Hollywood , 2006 .

[50]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  Bringing Society Back into the Climate Debate , 2005 .

[51]  W. Powell,et al.  Institutions and Entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[52]  Steven Klepper,et al.  The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the US automobile industry , 2002 .

[53]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields , 2002 .

[54]  Hayagreeva Rao,et al.  Caveat Emptor: The Construction of Nonprofit Consumer Watchdog Organizations1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[55]  S. Winter,et al.  The Co-evolution of Capabilities and Transaction Costs: Explaining the Institutional Structure of Production , 2005 .

[56]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging , 2000 .

[57]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Resource-Based View of the Firm in Two Environments: The Hollywood Film Studios From 1936 to 1965 , 1996 .

[58]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[59]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[60]  P. A. Geroski,et al.  The Evolution of New Markets , 2003 .

[61]  Richard N. Langlois,et al.  Firms, Markets and Economic Change: A dynamic Theory of Business Institutions , 1995 .

[62]  Candace Jones,et al.  Co-Evolution of Entrepreneurial Careers, Institutional Rules and Competitive Dynamics in American Film, 1895-1920 , 2001 .

[63]  Masaru Okumura,et al.  'The Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Style & Mode of Production to 1960,' David Bordwell, Janet Staiger and Kristin Thompson, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, Melbourne and Henley, 1985 , 1986 .

[64]  S. Mezias,et al.  The community dynamics of entrepreneurship , 2001 .

[65]  Kathryn Graziano The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail , 1998 .

[66]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  The Competitive Dynamics of Vertical Integration: Evidence from U.S. Motion Picture Producers, 1912–1970 , 2006 .

[67]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[68]  A. Meyer Adapting to environmental jolts. , 1982, Administrative science quarterly.

[69]  David Bordwell,et al.  The Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Style & Mode of Production to 1960 , 1985 .

[70]  Richard Dyer MacCann Independence, with a Vengeance , 1962 .

[71]  Gorham Anders Kindem,et al.  The American movie industry : the business of motion pictures , 1982 .

[72]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[73]  P. Lev The Fifties: Transforming the Screen, 1950–1959 , 2006 .

[74]  P. A. Gerosky,et al.  Innovation and the Evolution of Market Structure , 1990 .

[75]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[76]  Benjamin Klein,et al.  The Economics of Block Booking , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[77]  Richard E. Caves,et al.  Book Review , 2001 .

[78]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[79]  Mary Tripsas,et al.  Thinking About Technology: Applying a Cognitive Lens to Technical Change , 2008 .

[80]  S. Lenway,et al.  Knowledge and competitive advantage, the coevolution of firms, technology and national institutions , 2003 .

[81]  M. Lounsbury Institutional Rationality and Practice Variation: New Directions in the Institutional Analysis of Practice , 2007 .

[82]  Tom Kemper Hidden Talent: The Emergence of Hollywood Agents , 2009 .

[83]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Constructing Markets and Shaping Boundaries: Entrepreneurial Power in Nascent Fields , 2009 .

[84]  S. Soule,et al.  Social Movements and Organization Theory: INSTITUTIONALIZATION AS A CONTESTED, MULTILEVEL PROCESS: THE CASE OF RATE REGULATION IN AMERICAN FIRE INSURANCE , 2005 .

[85]  Michael Storper,et al.  The Transition to Flexible Specialisation in the U.S. Film Industry: External Economies, the Division of Labour, and the Crossing of Industrial Divides , 1989 .

[86]  Christopher Marquis,et al.  Acting Globally but Thinking Locally? The Enduring Influence of Local Communities on Organizations , 2009 .

[87]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[88]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 2 of 2: Organizational Boundaries and Theories of Organization , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[89]  A. Scott On Hollywood: The Place, The Industry , 2005 .

[90]  Marc Schneiberg,et al.  What's on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900-1950 , 2007 .

[91]  M. Lounsbury,et al.  Ending the Family Quarrel , 1997 .

[92]  N. Phillips,et al.  The Birth of the 'Kodak Moment': Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Adoption of New Technologies , 2005 .

[93]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation and Dynamic Competition: The Smaller "Footprint" Strategy , 2006 .

[94]  Heather A. Haveman,et al.  Structuring a Theory of Moral Sentiments: Institutional and Organizational Coevolution in the Early Thrift Industry1 , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[95]  J. Robins,et al.  ORGANIZATION AS STRATEGY: RESTRUCTURING PRODUCTION IN THE FILM INDUSTRY , 1993 .

[96]  M. Lounsbury A Tale of Two Cities: Competing Logics and Practice Variation In the Professionalizing of Mutual Funds , 2007 .

[97]  P. Ghemawat Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy , 1991 .

[98]  S. Winter,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Firm Boundaries: The Theory of a Firm , 2005 .

[99]  Joel W. Finler The Hollywood Story , 1988 .

[100]  A. McGahan How industries change. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[101]  Jay B. Barney,et al.  Special Theory Forum The Resource-Based Model of the Firm: Origins, Implications, and Prospects , 1991 .

[102]  Mark I. Weinstein Profit‐Sharing Contracts in Hollywood: Evolution and Analysis , 1998, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[103]  D. Teece,et al.  How to Capture Value from Innovation: Shaping Intellectual Property and Industry Architecture , 2007 .

[104]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[105]  M. Jacobides,et al.  Benefiting from Innovation: Value Creation, Value Appropriation and the Role of Industry Architectures , 2006 .

[106]  S. Fixson,et al.  The Power of Integrality: Linkages between Product Architecture, Innovation, and Industry Structure , 2007 .

[107]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION, STRATEGIC CHANGE AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: A STUDY OF RAILROAD DEREGULATION , 1987 .

[108]  Naomi R. Lamoreaux,et al.  Coordination and Information: Historical Perspectives on the Organization of Enterprise ed. by Naomi R. Lamoreaux, Daniel M. G. Raff (review) , 1996, Technology and Culture.

[109]  Thomas Schatz The Genius of the System: Hollywood Filmmaking in the Studio Era , 1988 .

[110]  Michele Hilmes Hollywood and Broadcasting: FROM RADIO TO CABLE , 1990 .

[111]  Michael Lounsbury,et al.  The Origins of Strategic Practice: Product Diversification in the American Mutual Fund Industry , 2004 .

[112]  S. Winter,et al.  Vertical Integration and Dis-integration of Computer Firms: A History Friendly Model of the Co-evolution of the Computer and Semiconductor Industries , 2008 .

[113]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[114]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Robust Identities or Nonentities? Typecasting in the Feature‐Film Labor Market1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[115]  Steven Klepper,et al.  The Evolution of New Industries and the Determinants of Market Structure , 1990 .

[116]  Maryam Nasiriyar,et al.  Knowledge integration and vertical specialization in the semiconductor industry , 2009 .

[117]  Darlene C. Chisholm,et al.  Asset Specificity and Long-Term Contracts: The Case of the Motion-Pictures Industry , 1993 .