The influence of levels of processing on recall from working memory and delayed recall tasks.

Recent research in working memory has highlighted the similarities involved in retrieval from complex span tasks and episodic memory tasks, suggesting that these tasks are influenced by similar memory processes. In the present article, the authors manipulated the level of processing engaged when studying to-be-remembered words during a reading span task (Experiment 1) and an operation span task (Experiment 2) in order to assess the role of retrieval from secondary memory during complex span tasks. Immediate recall from both span tasks was greater for items studied under deep processing instructions compared with items studied under shallow processing instructions regardless of trial length. Recall was better for deep than for shallow levels of processing on delayed recall tests as well. These data are consistent with the primary-secondary memory framework, which suggests that to-be-remembered items are displaced from primary memory (i.e., the focus of attention) during the processing phases of complex span tasks and therefore must be retrieved from secondary memory.

[1]  R. Engle,et al.  Executive Attention, Working Memory Capacity, and a Two-Factor Theory of Cognitive Control. , 2003 .

[2]  R. Engle,et al.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[3]  Anne Anastasi,et al.  The nature of individual differences. , 1939 .

[4]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[6]  Joel Myerson,et al.  Similarities and differences between working memory and long-term memory: evidence from the levels-of-processing span task. , 2010, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[7]  David P McCabe,et al.  The Role of Covert Retrieval in Working Memory Span Tasks: Evidence from Delayed Recall Tests. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[8]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[9]  Randall W Engle,et al.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  A. Miyake,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control , 1999 .

[11]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[12]  K. Oberauer Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  M. McDaniel,et al.  The relationship between working memory capacity and executive functioning: evidence for a common executive attention construct. , 2010, Neuropsychology.

[14]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[16]  Graham J Hitch,et al.  The recall of information from working memory. Insights from behavioural and chronometric perspectives. , 2008, Experimental psychology.

[17]  Rw Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task specific , 1987 .

[18]  P. Verhaeghen,et al.  Glimpses of a one-speed mind: focus-switching and search for verbal and visual, and easy and difficult items in working memory. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[19]  R. Lockhart,et al.  Negative recency and levels of processing in free recall. , 1974 .

[20]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Time constraints and resource sharing in adults' working memory spans. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  Randall W. Engle,et al.  Simple and complex memory spans and their relation to fluid abilities: Evidence from list-length effects , 2006 .