Turbulence characteristics of particle-laden pipe flow

Turbulence characteristics of vertical air–solid pipe flow are investigated in this paper. Direct numerical simulations of the gas phase have been performed, while the solid particles have been simulated by a Lagrangian approach, including particle collisions. The modelling of wall roughness is shown to be important to obtain agreement with experimental data. Reynolds stresses and Reynolds stress budgets are given for both phases and for a wide range of solid–air mass load ratios (mass loads), varying from 0.11 to 30. Air turbulence intensities, Reynolds shear stress, and turbulence production reduce with increasing mass load. The mean air profile does not alter for low mass loads. In this regime, a simple theory predicts that the reduction of air turbulent production relative to unladen turbulent production is approximately equal to the mass load ratio. The insight that the solids Reynolds shear stress can be significant, even for low mass loads, is essential for this explanation. It is shown that at least two mechanisms cause the turbulence reduction. In addition to the classically recognized mechanism of dissipation of turbulent fluctuations by particles, there is another suppressing mechanism in inhomogeneous flows: the non-uniform relative velocity of the phases, created because particles slip at the wall, collide, and slowly react with the continuous phase. Investigation of the air turbulent kinetic energy equation demonstrates that the relative reduction of air pressure strain is larger than the reduction of turbulent production and dissipation, and pressure strain may therefore be a cause of the reduction of the other quantities. The fluctuational dissipation induced by the drag forces from particles is small compared to the other terms, but not negligible. For intermediate and high mass loads the air turbulence remains low. The relatively small turbulence intensities are not generated by the standard turbulent mechanisms any more, but directly caused by the particle motions. The particle–fluid interaction term in the turbulent kinetic energy equation is no longer dissipative, but productive instead. On increasing the mass load, the radial and azimuthal fluctuations of the particles grow. The corresponding reduction of solids anisotropy is an effect of the inter-particle collisions, which act as a solids pressure strain term. For intermediate and high mass loads, fluctuational drag force and particle collisions appear to be the relevant dissipation mechanisms in the solids fluctuational energy equation. In contrast to the air turbulent production, the solids ‘turbulent’ production term has the same level for low and high mass loads, while it attains a clear local minimum between. With increasing mass load, large-scale coherent turbulent fluid structures weaken, and eventually disappear. Simultaneously, the fluid fluctuations at relatively small length scales are enhanced by the motion of the particles. The highest particle concentration occurs near the wall for low mass loads, but on increasing the mass load, the concentration profile becomes uniform, while for the highest mass load particles accumulate in the centre of the pipe. Two-point correlation functions indicate that the addition of a small number of small solid particles to a clean pipe flow increases the streamwise length scale of the turbulence.

[1]  Lance R. Collins,et al.  Numerical Considerations in Simulating a Turbulent Suspension of Finite-Volume Particles , 1996 .

[2]  John R. Fessler,et al.  Preferential concentration of heavy particles in a turbulent channel flow , 1994 .

[3]  B. Hoomans Granular dynamics of gas-solid two-phase flows , 2000 .

[4]  Franz Durst,et al.  On the motion of particles in turbulent duct flows , 1982 .

[5]  Martin Sommerfeld,et al.  MODELLING OF PARTICLE-WALL COLLISIONS IN CONFINED GAS-PARTICLE FLOWS , 1992 .

[6]  J. O N A T H A,et al.  Compressibility effects in a turbulent annular mixing layer . Part 1 . Turbulence and growth rate , 2022 .

[7]  T. J. Hanratty,et al.  Effect of feedback and inter-particle collisions in an idealized gas–liquid annular flow , 2006 .

[8]  J. Eaton,et al.  Effects of Wall Roughness on Particle Velocities in a Turbulent Channel Flow , 2005 .

[9]  Anthony D. Paris,et al.  Turbulence attenuation in a particle-laden channel flow , 2001 .

[10]  L. Portela,et al.  Numerical study of the near-wall behaviour of particles in turbulent pipe flows , 2002 .

[11]  Clayton T. Crowe,et al.  Effect of particle size on modulating turbulent intensity , 1989 .

[12]  John R. Fessler,et al.  Particle response and turbulence modification in fully developed channel flow , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  '. ByA.W.VREMAN Compressible mixing layer growth rate and turbulence characteristics , 2006 .

[14]  Jennifer S. Curtis,et al.  Reynolds number dependence of gas-phase turbulence in gas–particle flows , 2005 .

[15]  V. Armenio,et al.  The importance of the forces acting on particles in turbulent flows , 2001 .

[16]  Ng Niels Deen,et al.  Review of discrete particle modeling of fluidized beds , 2007 .

[17]  Jerry Westerweel,et al.  Fully developed turbulent pipe flow: a comparison between direct numerical simulation and experiment , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  A. W. Vreman,et al.  Can turbophoresis be predicted by large-eddy simulation? , 2005 .

[19]  Efstathios E. Michaelides,et al.  Turbulence modulation in particulate flows—A theoretical approach , 1992 .

[20]  J. Kuipers,et al.  Discrete particle simulation of bubble and slug formation in a two-dimensional gas-fluidised bed: A hard-sphere approach. , 1996 .

[21]  A. W. Vreman The adjoint filter operator in large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow , 2004 .

[22]  W. Uijttewaal,et al.  Particle dispersion and deposition in direct numerical and large eddy simulations of vertical pipe flows , 1996 .

[23]  A. Soldati,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of particle wall transfer and deposition in upward turbulent pipe flow , 2003 .

[24]  J. Borée,et al.  Effect of collisions on the dispersed phase fluctuation in a dilute tube flow: Experimental and theoretical analysis , 2003 .

[25]  J. Borée,et al.  Dilute bidispersed tube flow: Role of interclass collisions at increased loadings , 2005 .

[26]  John B. McLaughlin,et al.  Numerical simulation of particle-laden turbulent channel flow , 2001 .

[27]  Jam Hans Kuipers,et al.  Hydrodynamic Modeling of Gas/Particle Flows in Riser Reactors , 1996 .

[28]  R. G. Cox,et al.  The lateral migration of spherical particles sedimenting in a stagnant bounded fluid , 1977, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[29]  J. Eaton,et al.  Homogeneous and isotropic turbulence modulation by small heavy ($St\sim 50$) particles , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[30]  D. Jeffrey,et al.  Kinetic theories for granular flow: inelastic particles in Couette flow and slightly inelastic particles in a general flowfield , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[31]  A. Veldman,et al.  Symmetry-preserving discretization of turbulent flow , 2003 .

[32]  John S. Young,et al.  A theory of particle deposition in turbulent pipe flow , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[33]  Henk A. van der Vorst,et al.  Bi-CGSTAB: A Fast and Smoothly Converging Variant of Bi-CG for the Solution of Nonsymmetric Linear Systems , 1992, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[34]  Yoshinobu Morikawa,et al.  LDV measurements of an air-solid two-phase flow in a vertical pipe , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[35]  Roger H. Rangel,et al.  Unsteady motion of two solid spheres in Stokes flow , 2006 .

[36]  T. Kajishima,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of turbulent gas–particle flow in a vertical channel: effect of considering inter-particle collisions , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[37]  B. Boersma,et al.  DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF PARTICLE DEPOSITION ONTO A FREE-SLIP AND NO-SLIP SURFACE , 1998 .

[38]  M. Reeks The transport of discrete particles in inhomogeneous turbulence , 1983 .

[39]  Dominique Legendre,et al.  Hydrodynamic interactions between two spherical bubbles rising side by side in a viscous liquid , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[40]  Bernardus J. Geurts,et al.  Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation V , 2004 .

[41]  S. Vanka,et al.  Numerical simulations of turbulence modulation by dense particles in a fully developed pipe flow , 2004 .

[42]  A. W. Vreman Macroscopic theory of multicomponent flows: irreversibility and well-posed equations , 2007 .

[43]  J. McLaughlin,et al.  On the role of the lift force in turbulence simulations of particle deposition , 1997 .

[44]  G. Ahmadi,et al.  Aerosol particle transport and deposition in vertical and horizontal turbulent duct flows , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[45]  P. Bagchia,et al.  Effect of turbulence on the drag and lift of a particle , 2003 .

[46]  Christopher E. Brennen,et al.  Fundamentals of Multiphase Flow , 2005 .