Extinction Thresholds in Demographic Models of Territorial Populations

A basic demographic model is constructed for territorial species in a region where patches of habitat suitable for survival and reproduction are randomly (or evenly) interspersed with patches of unsuitable habitat. The model predicts the equilibrium occupancy of suitable habitat as a function of the proportion of the region composed of suitable habitat, h, and of the demographic potential of the population, k, which is determined by parameters of the life history and dispersal behavior of individuals. If 0 < k < 1, the demographic potential gives the equilibrium occupancy in a completely suitable region, and the population will become extinct in the region if h $\leq$ 1 - k. Difficulty in finding a mate, the finite extent of the region containing suitable habitat, and serially uncorrelated fluctuations in life history parameters all increase the minimum value of h necessary to sustain a population. Models of this type should be useful for predicting the effects of habitat destruction and fragmentation, or habitat improvement, on the population sizes of rare or endangered species with territorial behavior.

[1]  S. Orzack.  Population Dynamics in Variable Environments. V. The Genetics of Homeostasis Revisited , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Larry D. Harris,et al.  The fragmented forest : island biogeography theory and the preservation of biotic diversity / Larry D. Harris , 1984 .

[3]  J. Namias.  Persistence of U.S. Seasonal Temperatures up to One Year , 1978 .

[4]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  Population dynamics in variable environments. III. Evolutionary dynamics of r-selection , 1982 .

[5]  Nathan Keyfitz,et al.  Introduction to the mathematics of population: with revisions , 1977 .

[6]  Kenneth E. F. Watt,et al.  Ecology and Resource Management , 1968 .

[7]  明 大久保,et al.  Diffusion and ecological problems : mathematical models , 1980 .

[8]  B. Skinner,et al.  The evolution of behavior. , 1984, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  M. Shaffer.  Minimum Population Sizes for Species Conservation , 1981 .

[10]  J. Diamond,et al.  Subdivision of nature reserves and the maintenance of species diversity , 1980, Nature.

[11]  N. Nicholls,et al.  Long-Range Weather Forecasting: Value, Status, and Prospects (Paper 80R0992) , 1980 .

[12]  D. B. Mertz.  The Mathematical Demography of the California Condor Population , 1971, The American Naturalist.

[13]  Karl P. Schmidt,et al.  Principles of Animal Ecology , 1950 .

[14]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[15]  P. H. Leslie.  THE INTRINSIC RATE OF INCREASE AND THE OVERLAP OF SUCCESSIVE GENERATIONS IN A POPULATION OF GUILLEMOTS (URIA AALGE PONT.) , 1966 .

[16]  A. J. Lotka.  Elements of mathematical biology , 1956 .

[17]  R. Levins.  Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological Control , 1969 .

[18]  Steven W. Buskirk,et al.  HOME RANGE, TIME, AND BODY SIZE IN MAMMALS' , 1986 .

[19]  H. Caswell,et al.  A general formula for the sensitivity of population growth rate to changes in life history parameters. , 1978, Theoretical population biology.

[20]  J. G. Skellam.  Random dispersal in theoretical populations , 1951, Biometrika.

[21]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective , 1980 .