Scale‐dependent habitat use in a long‐ranging central place predator

Summary 1. It is predicted that the movements of foraging animals are adjusted to the hierarchical spatial distribution of resources in the environment, and that decisions to modify movement in response to heterogeneous resource distribution are scale-dependent. Thus, controlling for spatial scales of interaction with environment is critical for a better understanding of habitat selection, which is likely to follow scale-dependent processes. 2. Here we study the scales of interactions and habitat selection in a long-ranging marine predator foraging from a central place, the yellow-nosed albatross. We use firstpassage time analysis to identify the scales of interaction with environmental variables and compositional analysis to study habitat selection. 3. Of 26 birds, 22 adopted an area restricted search (ARS) at a scale of 130 ± 85 km, and 11 of these 22 birds adopted a second, nested ARS scale at 34 ± 20 km. Habitat use differed according to the spatial scale considered. At the oceanic basin macro-scale, birds foraged in pelagic, subtropical waters. Birds commuted to the ARS zones after a c. 1500-km trip to reach predictable turbulence zones from Agulhas return current, where primary productivity was enhanced at large scale. At a smaller, meso-scale, birds increased their search effort according to sea surface height anomalies (SSHa) and chlorophyll- a concentrations (Chl- a ), indicating association with productive cyclonic eddies. 4. Among birds, differences in search pattern were noted: 11 birds concentrated their search effort directly at a small scale of 77 ± 22 km, avoiding anticyclonic eddies. The 11 other birds showed two scales of ARS pattern: (i) first at 180 ± 90 km with a preference for high Chl- a concentrations but unrelated to SSHa; and (ii) secondly at a nested scale at 34 ± 20 km related exclusively to SSHa where prey patches were expected to be distributed at this scale. This second group of birds appeared to be less efficient, spending more time at sea for the same mass gain than the first group. 5. Our study is the first to demonstrate scale-dependent adjustments, with interindividual variability, in relation to environmental features for predators with a central-place constraint.

[1]  D. Irons.  FORAGING AREA FIDELITY OF INDIVIDUAL SEABIRDS IN RELATION TO TIDAL CYCLES AND FLOCK FEEDING , 1998 .

[2]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Pelagic seabirds and the marine environment: foraging patterns of wandering albatrosses in relation to prey availability and distribution , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  P. A. Prince,et al.  Exploitation of the marine environment by two sympatric albatrosses in the Pacific Southern Ocean , 1999 .

[4]  Laurent Dubroca,et al.  Spatial distribution of foraging in female Antarctic fur seals Arctocephalus gazella in relation to oceanographic variables: a scale-dependent approach using geographic information systems , 2001 .

[5]  M. Srokosz,et al.  Satellite observations of the Agulhas Current system , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[6]  Henri Weimerskirch,et al.  Activity pattern of foraging in the wandering albatross: a marine predator with two modes of prey searching , 1997 .

[7]  K. Hyrenbach,et al.  Oceanographic habitats of two sympatric North Pacific albatrosses during the breeding season , 2002 .

[8]  Torkild Tveraa,et al.  USING FIRST‐PASSAGE TIME IN THE ANALYSIS OF AREA‐RESTRICTED SEARCH AND HABITAT SELECTION , 2003 .

[9]  B. H. Becker,et al.  Scale-dependent habitat selection by a nearshore seabird, the marbled murrelet, in a highly dynamic upwelling system , 2003 .

[10]  D. Costa,et al.  Foraging effort in relation to the constraints of reproduction in free‐ranging albatrosses , 2003 .

[11]  P. Froneman,et al.  Size-fractionated primary production studies in the vicinity of the Subtropical Front and an adjacent warm-core eddy south of Africa in austral winter , 1999 .

[12]  C. Tynan.  Ecological importance of the Southern Boundary of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current , 1998, Nature.

[13]  Emily D. Silverman,et al.  Aggregation patterns of pelagic predators and their principal prey, Antarctic krill, near South Georgia , 1993 .

[14]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Dimethyl sulphide as a foraging cue for Antarctic Procellariiform seabirds , 1995, Nature.

[15]  P. Ryan,et al.  Exploitation of mesoscale oceanographic features by grey-headed albatross Thalassarche chrysostoma in the southern Indian Ocean , 2001 .

[16]  C. McQuaid,et al.  Distribution of surface zooplankton and seabirds across the Southern Ocean , 1996, Polar Biology.

[17]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Movement parameters of ungulates and scale‐specific responses to the environment , 2002 .

[18]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Ultimate and proximate factors affecting the breeding performance of a marine top-predator , 2002 .

[19]  Yves Handrich,et al.  Foraging habitat and food intake of satellite-tracked king penguins during the austral summer at Crozet Archipelago , 1997 .

[20]  C. Pennycuick.  The Flight of Petrels and Albatrosses (Procellariiformes), Observed in South Georgia and its Vicinity , 1982 .

[21]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Exploitation of distant Antarctic waters and close shelf-break waters by white-chinned petrels rearing chicks , 2000 .

[22]  N. B. Kotliar,et al.  Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity , 1990 .

[23]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Environmental heterogeneity and the evolution of foraging behaviour in long ranging greater albatrosses , 2003 .

[24]  Hideo Tameishi,et al.  Warm-core rings, streamers and their role on the fishing ground formation around Japan , 1992 .

[25]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Improved Global Sea Surface Temperature Analyses Using Optimum Interpolation , 1994 .

[26]  P. A. Prince,et al.  Individual and population level dispersal of black-browed albatrosses Diomedea melanophris and grey-headed albatrosses D. chrysostoma in response to Antarctic krill , 1997 .

[27]  F. Messier,et al.  Hierarchical habitat selection by woodland caribou: its relationship to limiting factors , 2000 .

[28]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Satellite tracking of Wandering albatrosses , 1990, Nature.

[29]  P. Fauchald,et al.  Foraging in a Hierarchical Patch System , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[30]  H. Fritz,et al.  Scale–dependent hierarchical adjustments of movement patterns in a long–range foraging seabird , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Kjell Einar Erikstad,et al.  SCALE‐DEPENDENT PREDATOR–PREY INTERACTIONS: THE HIERARCHICAL SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF SEABIRDS AND PREY , 2000 .

[32]  S. Levin.  The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[33]  P. Wiebe,et al.  Patterns and Processes in the Time-Space Scales of Plankton Distributions , 1978 .

[34]  Christophe Guinet,et al.  Foraging ground fidelity and route-choice tactics of a marine predator: the Antarctic fur seal Arctocephalus gazella , 2001 .

[35]  Thomas Alerstam,et al.  Flight Tracks and Speeds of Antarctic and Atlantic Seabirds: Radar and Optical Measurements , 1993 .

[36]  G. Odell,et al.  Swarms of Predators Exhibit "Preytaxis" if Individual Predators Use Area-Restricted Search , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[37]  Douglas H. Johnson.  THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[38]  Nicholas J. Aebischer,et al.  Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use From Animal Radio-Tracking Data , 1993 .

[39]  D. Grünbaum,et al.  BLACK-BROWED ALBATROSSES FORAGING ON ANTARCTIC KRILL: DENSITY-DEPENDENCE THROUGH LOCAL ENHANCEMENT? , 2003 .

[40]  Corey J. A. Bradshaw,et al.  The optimal spatial scale for the analysis of elephant seal foraging as determined by geo-location in relation to sea surface temperatures , 2002 .

[41]  R. Pollard,et al.  A quasi-synoptic view of the frontal circulation in the Crozet Basin during the Antares-4 cruise , 2002 .

[42]  Anthony J. Gaston,et al.  The Petrels: Their Ecology and Breeding Systems , 1991 .

[43]  P. D. Abel,et al.  Ecotoxicology and the marine environment , 1991 .

[44]  P. A. Prince,et al.  Cephalopods and mesoscale oceanography at the Antarctic Polar Front: satellite tracked predators locate pelagic trophic interactions , 1996 .