Frequency of prolonged remission duration after high-dose cytarabine intensification in acute myeloid leukemia varies by cytogenetic subtype.

Advances in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have occurred with the introduction of new therapies including high-dose cytarabine and the identification of powerful prognostic factors such as cytogenetics that predict for long-term outcome. To date, the prognostic impact of cytarabine dose escalation within various cytogenetic groups of AML has not been assessed. We describe 285 newly diagnosed patients with primary AML who had adequate karyotypes and were enrolled on a prospective Cancer and Leukemia Group B cytogenetic study. All patients were randomly assigned to postremission treatment with standard-, intermediate-, or high-dose cytarabine intensification. Patients were categorized to one of three cytogenetic groups: (a) core binding factor type [(CBF); ie., t(8;21) inv(16), t(16;16), and del(16)]; (b) normal; and (c) other abnormality karyotype. An evaluation of these patients after a median follow-up time of over 7 years was performed to determine the relationship of intensification to outcome by cytogenetic group. Patients included 57 patients with CBF AML, 140 patients with normal karyotype AML, and 88 patients with other cytogenetic abnormalities. The treatment outcome of CBF AML patients was superior, with an estimated 50% still in complete remission (CR) after 5 years as compared with 32 and 15% for patients with normal karyotype AML and other abnormality AML, respectively (P < 0.001). Univariate analysis showed the following nonkaryotype factors to predict a prolonged CR duration: (a) younger age (P < 0.008); (b) lower leukocyte count (P=0.01); (c) the presence of Auer rods (P=0.004); (d) a lower percentage of bone marrow blasts (P=0.001) at the time of diagnosis, (e) and a higher postremission cytarabine dose (P < 0.001). The impact of cytarabine dose on long-term remission was most marked (P < 0.001) in the CBF AML group (after 5 years, 78% of those with a dose of 3 g/m2 were still in CR, 57% of those with a dose of 400 mg/m2 were still in CR, and 16% of those with a dose of 100 mg/m2 were still in CR) followed by normal karyotype AML (P=0.01; after 5 years, 40% of those with a dose of 3 g/m2 were still in CR, 37% of those with a dose of 400 mg/m2 were still in CR, and 20% of those with a dose of 100 mg/m2 were still in CR). In contrast, cytarabine at all doses produced only a 21% or less chance of long-term continuous CR for patients with other cytogenetic abnormalities. A multivariate analysis of CR duration assessed the independent impact of each of these variables on cure. Significant factors entering this model in descending order of importance were cytogenetic group (CBF > normal > other abnormality; P=0.00001), cytarabine dose (3 g/m2 > 400 mg/m2 > 100 mg/m2; P=0.00001), logarithm of leukocyte count at the time of diagnosis (P=0.0005), and histological subtype of AML (P=0.005). This study demonstrates that the curative impact of cytarabine intensification varies significantly among cytogenetic groups and results in a substantial prolongation of CR among patients with CBF and normal karyotypes, but not in those with other karyotypic abnormalities. These findings support the use of pretreatment cytogenetics in risk stratification of postremission AML therapy.

[1]  H. Skipper,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL ANTICANCER AGENTS. XIII. ON THE CRITERIA AND KINETICS ASSOCIATED WITH "CURABILITY" OF EXPERIMENTAL LEUKEMIA. , 1964, Cancer chemotherapy reports.

[2]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Acute leukemias with structurally altered core binding factor subunits (t(8;21), inv(16), t(12;21)), 27-28 June 1997, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. , 1997, Leukemia.

[3]  E. Thiel,et al.  Improved cure rate by very early intensification combined with prolonged maintenance chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: data from the AML Cooperative Group. , 1991, Seminars in hematology.

[4]  M. Stul,et al.  Cytogenetic profile of minimally differentiated (FAB M0) acute myeloid leukemia: correlation with clinicobiologic findings. , 1995, Blood.

[5]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  The clinical significance of karyotype in acute myelogenous leukemia. , 1989, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[6]  V. Farewell A model for a binary variable with time-censored observations , 1977 .

[7]  Ross Maller,et al.  Estimating the proportion of immunes in a censored sample , 1992 .

[8]  J Halpern,et al.  Cure rate models: power of the logrank and generalized Wilcoxon tests. , 1987, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  G. Papa,et al.  Analysis of treatment failure in patients with minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukemia (AML-M0). , 1994, Blood.

[10]  A I Goldman,et al.  Survivorship analysis when cure is a possibility: a Monte Carlo study. , 1984, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  F. Mandelli,et al.  Autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation compared with intensive chemotherapy in acute myelogenous leukemia. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell'Adulto (GIMEMA) Leukemia Cooperative Groups. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  G Flandrin,et al.  Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia. A report of the French-American-British Cooperative Group. , 1985, Annals of internal medicine.

[13]  R. Mayer,et al.  Intensive postremission chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer and Leukemia Group B. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  M. Caligiuri,et al.  Rearrangement of ALL1 (MLL) in acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics. , 1998, Cancer research.

[15]  M. Freedman,et al.  Fusion Between Transcription Factor CBFP/PEBP2I3 andaMyosin HeavyChain in AcuteMyeloid Leukemia , 1993 .

[16]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Clinical significance of cytogenetics in acute myeloid leukemia. , 1997, Seminars in oncology.

[17]  Edward J. Lee,et al.  Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (filgrastim) accelerates granulocyte recovery after intensive postremission chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia with aziridinyl benzoquinone and mitoxantrone: Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 9022. , 1997, Blood.

[18]  E. Estey,et al.  Cytogenetic and clinical correlates in AML patients with abnormalities of chromosome 16. , 1995, Leukemia.

[19]  F. Collins,et al.  Fusion between transcription factor CBF beta/PEBP2 beta and a myosin heavy chain in acute myeloid leukemia. , 1993, Science.

[20]  J. Rowley,et al.  A collaborative study of the relationship of the morphological type of acute nonlymphocytic leukemia with patient age and karyotype. , 1982, Blood.

[21]  D. Davey,et al.  8;21 translocation in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Occurrence in M1 and M2 FAB subtypes. , 1989, American journal of clinical pathology.

[22]  S. Vollset,et al.  Postremission chemotherapy for adults with acute myelogenous leukemia: improved survival with high-dose cytarabine and daunorubicin consolidation treatment. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  M. Tribalto,et al.  Incidence of chromosome abnormalities and clinical significance of karyotype in de novo acute myeloid leukemia. , 1993, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[24]  M. Grever,et al.  A randomized investigation of high-dose versus standard-dose cytosine arabinoside with daunorubicin in patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group study. , 1996, Blood.

[25]  J. Fay,et al.  High-dose cytarabine and daunorubicin as consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: long-term follow-up and results. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  M. Ohki,et al.  t(8;21) breakpoints on chromosome 21 in acute myeloid leukemia are clustered within a limited region of a single gene, AML1. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Edward J. Lee,et al.  Prognostic impact of cytogenetic abnormalities in patients with de novo acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. , 1989, Blood.

[28]  V. Farewell,et al.  The use of mixture models for the analysis of survival data with long-term survivors. , 1982, Biometrics.

[29]  G. Tricot,et al.  8/21 translocation in acute myeloid leukaemia. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of haematology.

[30]  Iscn International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature , 1978 .