Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback

Across lexical processing tasks, it is well established that words with richer semantic representations are recognized faster. This suggests that the lexical system has access to meaning before a word is fully identified, and is consistent with a theoretical framework based on interactive and cascaded processing. Specifically, semantic richness effects are argued to be produced by feedback from semantic representations to lower-level representations. The present study explores the extent to which richness effects are mediated by feedback from lexical- to letter-level representations. In two lexical decision experiments, we examined the joint effects of stimulus quality and four semantic richness dimensions (imageability, number of features, semantic neighborhood density, semantic diversity). With the exception of semantic diversity, robust additive effects of stimulus quality and richness were observed for the targeted dimensions. Our results suggest that semantic feedback does not typically reach earlier levels of representation in lexical decision, and further reinforces the idea that task context modulates the processing dynamics of early word recognition processes.

[1]  Paul D. Siakaluk,et al.  Meaning in mind: Semantic richness effects in language processing , 2014 .

[2]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model account of masked versus unmasked priming: are they qualitatively different? , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  D. Balota,et al.  Moving Beyond the Mean in Studies of Mental Chronometry , 2011 .

[4]  P. Hoffman,et al.  Opposing Effects of Semantic Diversity in Lexical and Semantic Relatedness Decisions , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Ian S. Hargreaves,et al.  There are many ways to be rich: Effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  S. Lupker,et al.  Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[8]  Mark J. Huff,et al.  An Abundance of Riches: Cross-Task Comparisons of Semantic Richness Effects in Visual Word Recognition , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[9]  T. Rogers,et al.  Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[10]  David A. Balota,et al.  Beyond mean response latency: Response time distributional analyses of semantic priming , 2008 .

[11]  Cyrus Shaoul,et al.  Exploring lexical co-occurrence space using HiDEx , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[12]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[13]  David A Balota,et al.  Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  R A Abrams,et al.  Mental chronometry: beyond onset latencies in the lexical decision task. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  D. Balota,et al.  On the Early Influence of Meaning in Word Recognition: A Review of the Literature , 2013 .

[18]  Derek Besner,et al.  Reading nonwords aloud: Results requiring change in the dual route cascaded model , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  Paul D. Siakaluk,et al.  Body—object interaction ratings for 1,618 monosyllabic nouns , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[20]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[21]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[22]  Ron Borowsky,et al.  Parallel distributed processing and lexical-semantic effects in visual word recognition: are a few stages necessary? , 2006, Psychological review.

[23]  P. L. Tenpenny,et al.  Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  Rémy Versace,et al.  Word frequency effect on repetition priming as a function of prime duration and delay between the prime and the target. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[25]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  Effects of Polysemy in Lexical Decision and Naming: An Alternative to Lexical Access Accounts , 1996 .

[26]  Penny M. Pexman,et al.  Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: The body–object interaction effect , 2008, Cognition.

[27]  David A. Balota,et al.  Not All Negative Words Slow Down Lexical Decision and Naming Speed: Importance of Word Arousal , 2008 .

[28]  D. Besner,et al.  Levels of representation in visual word recognition: a dissociation between morphological and semantic processing. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Derek Besner,et al.  Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007). , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  S. Andrews,et al.  Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: a matter of some moment? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs , 2012 .

[32]  D. Mewhort,et al.  Analysis of Response Time Distributions: An Example Using the Stroop Task , 1991 .

[33]  S. Lupker,et al.  Semantic ambiguity and the process of generating meaning from print. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  D. Besner,et al.  On the joint effects of repetition and stimulus quality in lexical decision: Looking to the past for a new way forward , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Effects of Phonological and Orthographic Neighbourhood Density Interact in Visual Word Recognition , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[36]  Thomas H. Killion,et al.  Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. , 1977 .

[37]  James L. McClelland On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[38]  Bradley G. Goodyear,et al.  Neural Correlates of Concreteness in Semantic Categorization , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  Penny M. Pexman,et al.  Imageability and body–object interaction ratings for 599 multisyllabic nouns , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[41]  Amy Beth Warriner,et al.  Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[42]  D. D. Wheeler Processes in word recognition , 1970 .

[43]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[44]  K. Heyer,et al.  Constraints on the additive relationship between semantic priming and word repetition and on the interactive relationship between semantic priming and stimulus clarity. , 1988 .

[45]  Derek Besner,et al.  Role of set in visual word recognition: Activation and activation blocking as nonautomatic processes. , 1996 .

[46]  Michael J. Cortese,et al.  Imageability estimates for 3,000 disyllabic words , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[47]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[48]  Derek Besner,et al.  On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  David A. Balota,et al.  Individual differences in the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency revealed by RT distributional analyses: The role of lexical integrity , 2009 .

[50]  S. Joordens,et al.  Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: Ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[51]  S. Lupker,et al.  Ambiguity and visual word recognition: can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects? , 1999, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[52]  D. Besner,et al.  Constraints on computational models of basic processes in reading. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  Ian S. Hargreaves,et al.  Tolerating ambiguity: ambiguous words recruit the left inferior frontal gyrus in absence of a behavioral effect. , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[54]  M. C. Smith,et al.  Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view. , 1992 .

[55]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[56]  Sally Andrews,et al.  From inkmarks to ideas : current issues in lexical processing , 2006 .

[57]  Penny M. Pexman,et al.  Homophone effects in lexical decision. , 2001 .

[58]  A. Heathcote,et al.  Reply to Speckman and Rouder: A theoretical basis for QML , 2004 .

[59]  D. Balota,et al.  Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: beyond measures of central tendency. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[60]  D. Plaut,et al.  Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. , 2000, Psychological review.

[61]  James H. Neely,et al.  When Word Identification Gets Tough, Retrospective Semantic Processing Comes to the Rescue. , 2012 .

[62]  David A. Balota Comprehension Processes in Reading. , 1990 .

[63]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition , 1971 .

[64]  G. Vigliocco,et al.  Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words , 2009, Cognition.

[65]  D. Besner,et al.  Reading aloud: qualitative differences in the relation between stimulus quality and word frequency as a function of context. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[66]  D. Besner,et al.  Dissociative effects of stimulus quality on semantic and morphological contexts in visual word recognition. , 2006, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[67]  Derek Besner,et al.  Models of Lexical Access in Visual Word Recognition , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[68]  P. Gomez,et al.  Decomposing encoding and decisional components in visual-word recognition: A diffusion model analysis , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[69]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Fitting distributions using maximum likelihood: Methods and packages , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[70]  George A. Miller,et al.  Introduction to WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database , 1990 .

[71]  J. H. Neely,et al.  Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[72]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.

[73]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[74]  D. Besner,et al.  Visual word recognition: a multistage activation model. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[75]  T. McNamara Semantic Priming: Perspectives from Memory and Word Recognition , 2005 .

[76]  M. Yap,et al.  The influence of emotion on lexical processing: Insights from RT distributional analysis , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[77]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[78]  Derek Besner,et al.  On the locus of the word frequency effect in visual word recognition , 1997 .

[79]  G. M. Reicher Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[80]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[81]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. , 2007, Psychological review.

[82]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[83]  Derek Besner,et al.  Neighbourhood density, word frequency, and spelling-sound regularity effects in naming: similarities and differences between skilled readers and the Dual Route Cascaded Computational model. , 2004, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[84]  James H. Neely,et al.  When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition. , 1995 .

[85]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[86]  D. Balota The Role of Meaning in word Recognition , 2012 .

[87]  K. Forster,et al.  REPETITION PRIMING AND FREQUENCY ATTENUATION IN LEXICAL ACCESS , 1984 .

[88]  Robert F. Stanners,et al.  Frequency and visual quality in a word-nonword classification task , 1975 .