Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Paul D. Siakaluk,et al. Meaning in mind: Semantic richness effects in language processing , 2014 .
[2] R. Ratcliff,et al. A diffusion model account of masked versus unmasked priming: are they qualitatively different? , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[3] D. Balota,et al. Moving Beyond the Mean in Studies of Mental Chronometry , 2011 .
[4] P. Hoffman,et al. Opposing Effects of Semantic Diversity in Lexical and Semantic Relatedness Decisions , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[5] Ian S. Hargreaves,et al. There are many ways to be rich: Effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[6] S. Lupker,et al. Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[7] Barbara J. Juhasz,et al. Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words , 2013, Behavior research methods.
[8] Mark J. Huff,et al. An Abundance of Riches: Cross-Task Comparisons of Semantic Richness Effects in Visual Word Recognition , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[9] T. Rogers,et al. Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.
[10] David A. Balota,et al. Beyond mean response latency: Response time distributional analyses of semantic priming , 2008 .
[11] Cyrus Shaoul,et al. Exploring lexical co-occurrence space using HiDEx , 2010, Behavior research methods.
[12] M. Posner,et al. Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .
[13] David A Balota,et al. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[14] Yasushi Hino,et al. The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[15] R A Abrams,et al. Mental chronometry: beyond onset latencies in the lexical decision task. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[16] D. Balota,et al. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[17] D. Balota,et al. On the Early Influence of Meaning in Word Recognition: A Review of the Literature , 2013 .
[18] Derek Besner,et al. Reading nonwords aloud: Results requiring change in the dual route cascaded model , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[19] Paul D. Siakaluk,et al. Body—object interaction ratings for 1,618 monosyllabic nouns , 2008, Behavior research methods.
[20] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009, Behavior research methods.
[21] J Grainger,et al. Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.
[22] Ron Borowsky,et al. Parallel distributed processing and lexical-semantic effects in visual word recognition: are a few stages necessary? , 2006, Psychological review.
[23] P. L. Tenpenny,et al. Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[24] Rémy Versace,et al. Word frequency effect on repetition priming as a function of prime duration and delay between the prime and the target. , 2003, British journal of psychology.
[25] Yasushi Hino,et al. Effects of Polysemy in Lexical Decision and Naming: An Alternative to Lexical Access Accounts , 1996 .
[26] Penny M. Pexman,et al. Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: The body–object interaction effect , 2008, Cognition.
[27] David A. Balota,et al. Not All Negative Words Slow Down Lexical Decision and Naming Speed: Importance of Word Arousal , 2008 .
[28] D. Besner,et al. Levels of representation in visual word recognition: a dissociation between morphological and semantic processing. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[29] Derek Besner,et al. Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007). , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[30] S. Andrews,et al. Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: a matter of some moment? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[31] Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al. Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs , 2012 .
[32] D. Mewhort,et al. Analysis of Response Time Distributions: An Example Using the Stroop Task , 1991 .
[33] S. Lupker,et al. Semantic ambiguity and the process of generating meaning from print. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[34] D. Besner,et al. On the joint effects of repetition and stimulus quality in lexical decision: Looking to the past for a new way forward , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[35] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Effects of Phonological and Orthographic Neighbourhood Density Interact in Visual Word Recognition , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[36] Thomas H. Killion,et al. Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. , 1977 .
[37] James L. McClelland. On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .
[38] Bradley G. Goodyear,et al. Neural Correlates of Concreteness in Semantic Categorization , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[39] Marco Zorzi,et al. Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.
[40] Penny M. Pexman,et al. Imageability and body–object interaction ratings for 599 multisyllabic nouns , 2011, Behavior research methods.
[41] Amy Beth Warriner,et al. Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas , 2014, Behavior research methods.
[42] D. D. Wheeler. Processes in word recognition , 1970 .
[43] Saul Sternberg,et al. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .
[44] K. Heyer,et al. Constraints on the additive relationship between semantic priming and word repetition and on the interactive relationship between semantic priming and stimulus clarity. , 1988 .
[45] Derek Besner,et al. Role of set in visual word recognition: Activation and activation blocking as nonautomatic processes. , 1996 .
[46] Michael J. Cortese,et al. Imageability estimates for 3,000 disyllabic words , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.
[47] Michael J Cortese,et al. Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[48] Derek Besner,et al. On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[49] David A. Balota,et al. Individual differences in the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency revealed by RT distributional analyses: The role of lexical integrity , 2009 .
[50] S. Joordens,et al. Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: Ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks , 2000, Memory & cognition.
[51] S. Lupker,et al. Ambiguity and visual word recognition: can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects? , 1999, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[52] D. Besner,et al. Constraints on computational models of basic processes in reading. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[53] Ian S. Hargreaves,et al. Tolerating ambiguity: ambiguous words recruit the left inferior frontal gyrus in absence of a behavioral effect. , 2011, Experimental psychology.
[54] M. C. Smith,et al. Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view. , 1992 .
[55] Max Coltheart,et al. Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .
[56] Sally Andrews,et al. From inkmarks to ideas : current issues in lexical processing , 2006 .
[57] Penny M. Pexman,et al. Homophone effects in lexical decision. , 2001 .
[58] A. Heathcote,et al. Reply to Speckman and Rouder: A theoretical basis for QML , 2004 .
[59] D. Balota,et al. Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: beyond measures of central tendency. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[60] D. Plaut,et al. Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. , 2000, Psychological review.
[61] James H. Neely,et al. When Word Identification Gets Tough, Retrospective Semantic Processing Comes to the Rescue. , 2012 .
[62] David A. Balota. Comprehension Processes in Reading. , 1990 .
[63] H. Rubenstein,et al. Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition , 1971 .
[64] G. Vigliocco,et al. Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words , 2009, Cognition.
[65] D. Besner,et al. Reading aloud: qualitative differences in the relation between stimulus quality and word frequency as a function of context. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[66] D. Besner,et al. Dissociative effects of stimulus quality on semantic and morphological contexts in visual word recognition. , 2006, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[67] Derek Besner,et al. Models of Lexical Access in Visual Word Recognition , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[68] P. Gomez,et al. Decomposing encoding and decisional components in visual-word recognition: A diffusion model analysis , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[69] Denis Cousineau,et al. Fitting distributions using maximum likelihood: Methods and packages , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[70] George A. Miller,et al. Introduction to WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database , 1990 .
[71] J. H. Neely,et al. Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[72] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.
[73] Thomas A. Schreiber,et al. The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[74] D. Besner,et al. Visual word recognition: a multistage activation model. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[75] T. McNamara. Semantic Priming: Perspectives from Memory and Word Recognition , 2005 .
[76] M. Yap,et al. The influence of emotion on lexical processing: Insights from RT distributional analysis , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[77] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .
[78] Derek Besner,et al. On the locus of the word frequency effect in visual word recognition , 1997 .
[79] G. M. Reicher. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.
[80] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things , 2005, Behavior research methods.
[81] Marco Zorzi,et al. Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. , 2007, Psychological review.
[82] M Coltheart,et al. DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.
[83] Derek Besner,et al. Neighbourhood density, word frequency, and spelling-sound regularity effects in naming: similarities and differences between skilled readers and the Dual Route Cascaded Computational model. , 2004, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[84] James H. Neely,et al. When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition. , 1995 .
[85] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator , 2010, Behavior research methods.
[86] D. Balota. The Role of Meaning in word Recognition , 2012 .
[87] K. Forster,et al. REPETITION PRIMING AND FREQUENCY ATTENUATION IN LEXICAL ACCESS , 1984 .
[88] Robert F. Stanners,et al. Frequency and visual quality in a word-nonword classification task , 1975 .