Age‐related trends in vertebral dimensions

Several studies have demonstrated age‐related changes in vertebral dimensions. Vertebral size has been reported to increase among elderly adults, with periosteal apposition resulting in increased cross‐sectional area (CSA) of the vertebral corpus combined with reduction in bone mineral density. These changes in CSA are observed to be sex‐specific, as the pronounced increase of vertebral CSA is found only in elderly males. However, the reduction in bone mineral density in old age is apparent within both sexes. It is thus hypothesized that higher fracture risk in elderly women is a result of their incapacity to increase vertebral size and thus adapt to bone mineral reduction. In this study, our aim was to explore whether the onset of these changes could be ascribed to specific age intervals and whether the proposed differences between the sexes are as great as previously suggested. To conduct this study we utilized two large early 20th century skeletal collections known as Terry and Bass (n = 181). We also utilized data from two lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging samples as a modern‐day reference (n = 497). Age, sex and ethnicity of all individuals were known. Vertebral CSA was determined by measuring three width and length dimensions from the corpus of the fourth lumbar vertebra (L4). Our results indicate only a moderate association between age and vertebral CSA. This association was observed to be relatively similar in both sexes, and we thus conclude that there is no clear sex‐specific compensatory mechanism for age‐related bone loss in vertebral size.

[1]  J. Niinimäki,et al.  Association of Modic Changes, Schmorl's Nodes, Spondylolytic Defects, High-Intensity Zone Lesions, Disc Herniations, and Radial Tears With Low Back Symptom Severity Among Young Finnish Adults , 2012, Spine.

[2]  D. Kiel,et al.  QCT measures of bone strength at the thoracic and lumbar spine: The Framingham study , 2012, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[3]  J. Niinimäki,et al.  Does Lumbar Disc Degeneration on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Associate With Low Back Symptom Severity in Young Finnish Adults? , 2011, Spine.

[4]  J. Niinimäki,et al.  Prevalence of Degenerative Imaging Findings in Lumbar Magnetic Resonance Imaging Among Young Adults , 2009, Spine.

[5]  Jaakko Niinimäki,et al.  Temporal Trends in Vertebral Size and Shape from Medieval to Modern-Day , 2009, PloS one.

[6]  A. Natri,et al.  Association of lumbar arterial stenosis with low back symptoms: A cross-sectional study using two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography , 2009, Acta radiologica.

[7]  Raija Korpelainen,et al.  Modic Changes in Endplates of Lumbar Vertebral Bodies: Prevalence and Association With Low Back and Sciatic Pain Among Middle-Aged Male Workers , 2007, Spine.

[8]  M. Dougados,et al.  Vertebral dimensions as risk factor of vertebral fracture in osteoporotic patients: a systematic literature review , 2007, Osteoporosis International.

[9]  D. Hunt,et al.  History and demographic composition of the Robert J. Terry anatomical collection. , 2005, American journal of physical anthropology.

[10]  Sundeep Khosla,et al.  Population‐Based Study of Age and Sex Differences in Bone Volumetric Density, Size, Geometry, and Structure at Different Skeletal Sites , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[11]  Ego Seeman,et al.  Pathogenesis of bone fragility in women and men , 2002, The Lancet.

[12]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Predicting human vertebral bone strength by vertebral static histomorphometry. , 2002, Bone.

[13]  C. Turner,et al.  Sexual Dimorphism in Vertebral Fragility Is More the Result of Gender Differences in Age‐Related Bone Gain Than Bone Loss , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[14]  C. Turner,et al.  The Biomechanical Basis of Vertebral Body Fragility in Men and Women , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[15]  E. Seeman,et al.  Fracture Site‐Specific Deficits in Bone Size and Volumetric Density in Men with Spine or Hip Fractures , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[16]  E. Seeman,et al.  The structural basis of bone fragility in men. , 1999, Bone.

[17]  C. Mautalen,et al.  Bone Mineral Density and Bone Size in Men With Primary Osteoporosis and Vertebral Fractures , 1998, Calcified Tissue International.

[18]  L. Melton,et al.  The Prevalence of Osteoporosis , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[19]  J. Sayre,et al.  Vertebral size in elderly women with osteoporosis. Mechanical implications and relationship to fractures. , 1995, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[20]  R. Eastell,et al.  Diagnostic value of estimated volumetric bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in osteoporosis , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[21]  M. Boechat,et al.  Gender differences in vertebral sizes in adults: biomechanical implications. , 1994, Radiology.

[22]  C. Ruff,et al.  Articular and diaphyseal remodeling of the proximal femur with changes in body mass in adults. , 1991, American journal of physical anthropology.

[23]  M. Corker,et al.  Bone and soft tissue injuries in post-mortem lumbar spines , 1990, Paraplegia.

[24]  S. H. Kan,et al.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[25]  H K Genant,et al.  Greater vertebral bone mineral mass in exercising young men. , 1986, The Western journal of medicine.

[26]  P. Sweetnam,et al.  Osteoporosis and the effects of ageing on bone mass in elderly men and women. , 1970, The Quarterly journal of medicine.

[27]  S. Garn,et al.  Continuing bone growth throughout life: a general phenomenon. , 1967, American journal of physical anthropology.

[28]  J. Niinimäki,et al.  Influence of physical activity on vertebral size , 2010, Osteoporosis International.

[29]  Everett L. Smith,et al.  Bone involution decrease in exercising middle-aged women , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[30]  L. Lanyon Functional strain as a determinant for bone remodeling , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[31]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Age-related changes in bone mass, structure, and strength – effects of loading , 2000, Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie.

[32]  A. Kenny,et al.  Osteoporosis in older men. , 2000, Clinical cornerstone.

[33]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Sex differences in age-related changes in vertebral body size, density and biomechanical competence in normal individuals. , 1990, Bone.

[34]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Sex differences in age-related loss of vertebral trabecular bone mass and structure--biomechanical consequences. , 1989, Bone.

[35]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Normal vertebral body size and compressive strength: relations to age and to vertebral and iliac trabecular bone compressive strength. , 1986, Bone.

[36]  P S Freedson,et al.  Physical activity patterns determined by heart rate monitoring in 6-7 year-old children. , 1981, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.