Acquiring diminutive allomorphs: taking item-specific characteristics into account

Abstract Phonological characteristics and frequencies of stems and allomorphs have been explored as possible factors causing differences in production accuracies between allomorphic forms. However, previous findings are not consistent and the relative contributions of these factors are unclear. This study investigated target and erroneous productions of the Dutch diminutive, which has five allomorphs with varying type frequencies and of which the selection depends on the phonological characteristics of the stems. Typically developing children (N = 115, 5;1–10;3) were tested on their production of real and nonce diminutives. Linear mixed effects modelling was used to analyse the data taking nonverbal IQ into account. Type frequencies of the allomorphs and differences in phonological characteristics of the stems were found to be related to differences in production accuracies between the allomorphs. However, phonological characteristics of the stems appeared to have a bigger impact, mainly due to the phonological complexity of these characteristics.

[1]  Yunheng Ji.  MORPHOLOGY , 1937, A Grammar of Italian Sign Language (LIS).

[2]  F. Weerman,et al.  The effects of phonological skills and vocabulary on morphophonological processing , 2017, First language.

[3]  T. Boersma.  Variability in the acquisition of allomorphs : The Dutch diminutive and past tense , 2018 .

[4]  K. Demuth,et al.  The Role of Frequency in Learning Morphophonological Alternations: Implications for Children With Specific Language Impairment. , 2017, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[5]  K. Demuth,et al.  Acquisition of nominal morphophonological alternations in Russian , 2017 .

[6]  P. Fikkert,et al.  Using Distributional Statistics to Acquire Morphophonological Alternations: Evidence from Production and Perception , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[7]  J. Paradis,et al.  Chinese L1 children's English L2 verb morphology over time: individual variation in long-term outcomes , 2016, Journal of Child Language.

[8]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[9]  K. Demuth,et al.  Phonological and morphophonological effects on grammatical development in children with specific language impairment. , 2015, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[10]  K. Demuth,et al.  Acoustic investigations into the later acquisition of syllabic -es plurals. , 2013, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[11]  J. Rispens,et al.  Past tense productivity in Dutch children with and without SLI: the role of morphophonology and frequency* , 2013, Journal of Child Language.

[12]  E. Blom,et al.  Past tense production by English second language learners with and without language impairment. , 2013, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[13]  Phaedra Royle,et al.  The French noun phrase in preschool children with SLI: morphosyntactic and error analyses* , 2012, Journal of Child Language.

[14]  E. Blom,et al.  Effects of input properties, vocabulary size, and L1 on the development of third person singular –s in child L2 English , 2012 .

[15]  P. Fikkert,et al.  Phonotactics and morphophonology in early child language: Evidence from Dutch , 2011, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[16]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[17]  Elise de Bree,et al.  Bempen or Bemben: Differences Between Children At-Risk of Dyslexia and Children With SLI on a Morpho-Phonological Task , 2010 .

[18]  Linda D. Jarmulowicz,et al.  Derivational morphophonology: exploring errors in third graders' productions. , 2009, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[19]  K. Demuth,et al.  Phonological constraints on children's production of English third person singular -s. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[20]  K. Plunkett,et al.  Inflectional Bootstrapping in 2-year-olds , 2008, Language and speech.

[21]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language , 2006 .

[22]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Errors of Omission in English-Speaking Children's Production of Plurals and the Past Tense: The Effects of Frequency, Phonology, and Competition , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  H. V. D. Lely,et al.  A challenge to current models of past tense inflection: The impact of phonotactics , 2006, Cognition.

[24]  I. Mennen,et al.  Acquisition of Dutch phonology: an overview , 2006 .

[25]  P. J. Brooks,et al.  Diminutives in child-directed speech supplement metric with distributional word segmentation cues , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  E. Bree,et al.  Acquisition of Morpho-phonology in Children with Specific Language Impairment and Typically Developing Children , 2005 .

[27]  Tania S. Zamuner,et al.  Acquisition of voicing neutralization and alternations in Dutch , 2005 .

[28]  Östen Dahl,et al.  The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity , 2004 .

[29]  J. Pierrehumbert.  Phonetic Diversity, Statistical Learning, and Acquisition of Phonology , 2003, Language and speech.

[30]  W. Blom.  From Root Infinitive to Finite Sentence : The acquisition of verbal inflections and auxiliaries , 2003 .

[31]  Jeroen van de Weijer,et al.  An Optimality Theoretical analysis of the Dutch diminutive , 2002 .

[32]  Nelleke Oostdijk,et al.  The spoken Dutch Corpus. Outline and first evaluation , 2000 .

[33]  V. Marchman,et al.  Morphological productivity in children with normal language and SLI: a study of the English past tense. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[34]  J. Oetting,et al.  Past-tense marking by children with and without specific language impairment. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[35]  Virginia A. Marchman,et al.  Children's Productivity in the English Past Tense: The Role of Frequency, Phonology, and Neighborhood Structure , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  G. Booij.  The Phonology of Dutch , 1995 .

[37]  E. Bates,et al.  Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis , 1994, Journal of Child Language.

[38]  D. Geeraerts,et al.  De semantische structuur van het diminutief , 1993 .

[39]  M. Boers,et al.  Woorden¬lijst voor 4- tot 6-jarigen: een streeflijst voor kleuters. , 1992 .

[40]  Joan L. Bybee.  Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form , 1985 .

[41]  Mieke Trommelen,et al.  The Syllable in Dutch , 1984 .

[42]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense , 1982 .

[43]  Norval Smith,et al.  The acquisition of some Dutch morphological rules , 1980, Journal of Child Language.

[44]  J. Raven,et al.  Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales , 1962 .

[45]  J. Berko.  The Child's Learning of English Morphology , 1958 .