Investigation of Steel-Stringer Bridges: Superstructures and Substructures, Volume I

There are hundreds of structurally deficient or functionally obsolete bridges in the state of Iowa. With the majority of these bridges located on rural county roads where there is limited funding available to replace the bridges, diagnostic load testing can be utilized to determine the actual load carrying capacity of the bridge. One particular family or fleet of bridges that has been determined to be desirable for load testing consists of single-span bridges with non-composite, cast-in-place concrete decks, steel stringers, and timber substructures. Six bridges with poor performing superstructure and substructure from the aforementioned family of bridges were selected to be load tested. The six bridges were located on rural roads in five different counties in Iowa: Boone, Carroll, Humboldt, Mahaska, and Marshall. Volume I of this report focuses on evaluating the superstructure for this family of bridges. This volume discusses the behavior characteristics that influence the load carrying capacity of this fleet of bridges. In particular, the live load distribution, partial composite action, and bearing restraint were investigated as potential factors that could influence the bridge ratings. Implementing fleet management practices, the bridges were analyzed to determine if the load test results could be predicted to better analyze previously untested bridges. For this family of bridges it was found that the ratings increased as a result of the load testing demonstrating a greater capacity than determined analytically. Volume II of this report focuses on evaluating the timber substructure for this family of bridges. In this volume, procedures for detecting pile internal decay using nondestructive ultrasonic stress wave techniques, correlating nondestructive ultrasonic stress wave techniques to axial compression tests to estimate deteriorated pile residual strength, and evaluating load distribution through poor performing timber substructure elements by instrumenting and load testing the abutments of the six selected bridges are discussed. Also, in this volume pile repair methods for restoring axial and bending capacities of pile are developed and evaluated.

[1]  Nasser Massoudi,et al.  Non-Destructive Testing of Piles Using the Low Strain Integrity Method , 2004 .

[2]  Baidar Bakht,et al.  Ultimate Load Test of Slab‐on‐Girder Bridge , 1992 .

[3]  Sharon L. Wood,et al.  FIELD EVALUATION OF DECOMMISSIONED NONCOMPOSITE STEEL GIRDER BRIDGE , 2002 .

[4]  R. N. Emerson.  In Situ Repair Technique for Decayed Timber Piles , 2004 .

[5]  Arun Kumar Pandey,et al.  DETERMINING THE LENGTH OF TIMBER PILES IN TRANSPORTATION STRUCTURES , 1996 .

[6]  Robert T. Brooks,et al.  Timber Pile Length Determination Using a Nondestructive Technique , 1994 .

[7]  Robert J. Ross,et al.  Nondestructive methods of evaluating quality of wood in preservative-treated piles. , 2000 .

[8]  Robert J. Ross,et al.  NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION TECHNIQUES FOR TIMBER BRIDGES , 1999 .

[9]  Michael G. Barker,et al.  Quantifying Field-Test Behavior for Rating Steel Girder Bridges , 2001 .

[10]  John Yao,et al.  Effectiveness of Pile Wraps for Timber Bearing Piles , 2001 .

[11]  Robert A. Douglas,et al.  DETERMINING LENGTHS OF INSTALLED TIMBER PILES BY DISPERSIVE WAVE PROPAGATION , 1994 .

[12]  T J Wipf,et al.  EVALUATION OF APPROPRIATE MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND REHABILITATION METHODS FOR IOWA BRIDGES , 2003 .

[13]  Shuangwu Chen,et al.  Condition Assessment of Installed Timber Piles by Dispersive Wave Propagation , 1996 .

[14]  Michael G. Barker.  Steel girder bridge field test procedures , 1999 .

[15]  M Sherif Aggour.  NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING OF TIMBER PILES FOR STRUCTURES , 1991 .

[16]  R. Richard Avent.  Durability of Posted and Epoxy-Grouted Timber Piles , 1989 .

[17]  Daryl R. Tweeton,et al.  3DTOM, Three-Dimensional Geophysical Tomography , 1996 .

[18]  S D Schiff,et al.  LOAD TESTING FOR ASSESSMENT AND RATING OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES. PHASE II: DEVELOPMENT OF A HIGHWAY BRIDGE LOAD RATING AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM , 2004 .

[19]  Houssam Toutanji.  Ultrasonic wave velocity signal interpretation of simulated concrete bridge decks , 2000 .

[20]  Fred Moses,et al.  Applications of field testing to bridge evaluation , 1994 .

[21]  G G Goble,et al.  DETERMINING BRIDGE RESPONSES TO OVERWEIGHT LOADS , 1998 .

[22]  S D Schiff,et al.  LOAD TESTING FOR ASSESSMENT AND RATING OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES. PHASE I: REVIEW OF CURRENT AND EXPERIMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES AND PRACTICES , 1999 .

[23]  Ronald W. Anthony.  Condition Assessment of Timber Piles , 2000 .

[24]  K Close,et al.  AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS COMPUTER SYSTEMS INDEX , 1976 .

[25]  F W Klaiber,et al.  TESTING OF OLD REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGES , 1997 .

[26]  R. Lopez-Anido,et al.  Experimental characterization of FRP composite-wood pile structural response by bending tests , 2003 .

[27]  Frank Rausche.  Non-Destructive Evaluation of Deep Foundations , 2004 .

[28]  Baidar Bakht,et al.  BRIDGE TESTING - A SURPRISE EVERY TIME , 1990 .

[29]  Michael A. Ritter,et al.  Timber Bridges: Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance , 1990 .

[30]  Michael J. Chajes,et al.  CAN ECONOMICAL BRIDGE TESTING REDUCE POSTING , 1996 .

[31]  Allen G. Davis,et al.  Nondestructive Evaluation of Existing Deep Foundations , 1995 .

[32]  T J Wipf,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF BRIDGE LOAD TESTING PROCESS FOR LOAD EVALUATION , 2003 .

[33]  H A Toutanji.  MULTIMEDIA TECHNOLOGY FOR TIMBER BRIDGE REPAIR , 2004 .

[34]  B G Stegman,et al.  DETERMINING THE CAPACITY OF UNKNOWN FOUNDATIONS , 2000 .