Utility of a novel high pressure non-compliant balloon for tibial atherosclerotic lesions in Asian patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia.

Background: The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a high pressure, non-compliant balloon in the treatment of infrapopliteal occlusive disease in Asian patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) from Singapore. Patients and methods: Prospective, multi-centre, single arm, non-randomized study. Immediate technical success, 6-month primary vessel patency (determined by Duplex ultrasonography), limb salvage, one-year clinically driven target lesion re-intervention (TLR) and amputation free survival (AFS) were the efficacy endpoints of interest. Results: 86 patients (63% males, mean age 68.9 ± 9.9 years) were enrolled over a 15-month period. Diabetes mellitus (DM) and end-stage renal failure (ESRF) were present in 94% and 38% of patients respectively. All had some degree of tissue loss at baseline (Rutherford scale 5 and 6 = 91% and 9% respectively). Of the 86 legs, 72% had 3 crural vessel disease and 84% had moderate/severe vessel wall calcification. 90% had > = 1 TASC D tibial lesion. Acute technical success was 89%. One month mortality was 3.5% and one-year freedom from TLR was 91%. 6-month tibial patency was 73%. 54/66 (82%) patients had at least one target treated tibial artery open at 6 months. A lower baseline toe pressure (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.00-1.05) and elastic recoil post angioplasty (OR 0.20, 95%CI 0.05-0.79) were associated with a worse 6 month tibial patency. One-year AFS was 67%. 47/66 (71%) patients had a clinical improvement of at least one Rutherford class at 6 months and 52/59 (88%) experienced complete wound healing at 12 months. Conclusions: Use of a high pressure non-compliant balloon is safe and efficacious in treating highly complex infra-popliteal atherosclerotic lesions in an otherwise challenging population of CLTI patients with a high incidence of DM and ESRF. It is associated with highly satisfactory acute technical success, 6-month target lesion patency and one-year limb salvage.

[1]  S. Spiliopoulos,et al.  Risk of Death and Amputation with Use of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in the Infrapopliteal Arteries for Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. , 2020, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[2]  Ç. Ünlü,et al.  Drug Coated Balloon Angioplasty vs. Standard Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty in Below the Knee Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2019, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[3]  F. Vermassen,et al.  Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. , 2019, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[4]  Kazuhiko Tanaka,et al.  A novel lesion crossing technique: Balloon deployment using FORcible Manner (BADFORM) technique , 2017, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[5]  I. Felekos,et al.  When everything else fails: High-pressure balloon for undilatable lesions. , 2017, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.

[6]  Ashok Seth,et al.  Expert Opinion: Optimising Stent Deployment in Contemporary Practice: The Role of Intracoronary Imaging and Non-compliant Balloons. , 2017, Interventional cardiology.

[7]  F. Ye,et al.  Incidence and Clinical Outcomes of Stent Fractures on the Basis of 6,555 Patients and 16,482 Drug-Eluting Stents From 4 Centers. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[8]  L. Miller,et al.  Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty in Patients With Infrapopliteal Arterial Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[9]  S. Himmelstein,et al.  The COMPLIANCE 360° Trial: a randomized, prospective, multicenter, pilot study comparing acute and long-term results of orbital atherectomy to balloon angioplasty for calcified femoropopliteal disease. , 2014, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[10]  I. Baumgartner,et al.  Early Recoil After Balloon Angioplasty of Tibial Artery Obstructions in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia , 2014, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[11]  R. Engelberger,et al.  Clinically-Driven Need for Secondary Interventions After Endovascular Revascularization of Tibial Arteries in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia , 2013, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[12]  M. Uematsu,et al.  Angiographic restenosis and its clinical impact after infrapopliteal angioplasty. , 2012, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[13]  F. Neumann,et al.  Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of infrapopliteal arteries reduce clinical event rate compared to bare-metal stents: long-term results from a randomized trial. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  H. Deutschmann,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus primary stenting in infrapopliteal arteries in critical limb ischemia. , 2011, VASA. Zeitschrift fur Gefasskrankheiten.

[15]  D. Scheinert,et al.  PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Original Studies Angiographic Patency and Clinical Outcome After Balloon-Angioplasty for Extensive Infrapopliteal Arterial Disease , 2010 .

[16]  H. Routledge,et al.  A noncompliant, high pressure balloon to manage undilatable coronary lesions , 2010, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[17]  B. Hamm,et al.  Inhibition of Restenosis in Femoropopliteal Arteries: Paclitaxel-Coated Versus Uncoated Balloon: Femoral Paclitaxel Randomized Pilot Trial , 2008, Circulation.

[18]  I. Baumgartner,et al.  Distribution pattern of infrageniculate arterial obstructions in patients with diabetes mellitus and renal insufficiency - implications for revascularization. , 2008, VASA. Zeitschrift fur Gefasskrankheiten.

[19]  M. Romiti,et al.  Meta-analysis of infrapopliteal angioplasty for chronic critical limb ischemia. , 2008, Journal of vascular surgery.

[20]  E. Romagnoli,et al.  Drug-eluting stenting: the case for post-dilation. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[21]  G. Moneta,et al.  Technical factors affecting autogenous vein graft failure: observations from a large multicenter trial. , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.

[22]  W. Weintraub The pathophysiology and burden of restenosis. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  J. Hart,et al.  Endovascular Therapy as the Primary Approach for Limb Salvage in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia: Experience with 443 Infrapopliteal Procedures , 2006, Vascular.

[24]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Is adjunctive balloon postdilatation necessary after coronary stent deployment? Final results from the POSTIT trial , 2003, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[25]  R. Rutherford,et al.  Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. , 1997, Journal of vascular surgery.

[26]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Intracoronary ultrasound observations during stent implantation. , 1994, Circulation.

[27]  J. Abele Balloon catheters and transluminal dilatation: technical considerations. , 1980, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.