GPS use negatively affects environmental learning through spatial transformation abilities

Abstract Research has established that GPS use negatively affects environmental learning and navigation in laboratory studies. Furthermore, the ability to mentally rotate objects and imagine locations from other perspectives (both known as spatial transformations) is positively related to environmental learning. Using previously validated spatial transformation and environmental learning tasks, the current study assessed a theoretical model where long-term GPS use is associated with worse mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial transformation abilities, which then predicts decreased ability to learn novel environments. We expected this prediction to hold even after controlling for self-reported navigation ability, which is also associated with better spatial transformation and environmental learning capabilities. We found that mental rotation and perspective-taking ability fully account for the effect of GPS use on learning of a virtual environment. This relationship remained after controlling for existing navigation ability. Specifically, GPS use is negatively associated with perspective-taking indirectly through mental rotation; we propose that GPS use affects the transformation ability common to mental rotation and perspective-taking.

[1]  Lukás Hejtmánek,et al.  Spatial knowledge impairment after GPS guided navigation: Eye-tracking study in a virtual town , 2018, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[2]  Chiara Meneghetti,et al.  Individual visuo-spatial factors and familiar environment knowledge: A structural equation modeling analysis , 2017 .

[3]  Maximilian Schwalm,et al.  Computer-assisted navigation and the acquisition of route and survey knowledge , 2006 .

[4]  M. Kozhevnikov,et al.  Perspective-Taking vs. Mental Rotation Transformations and How They Predict Spatial Navigation Performance. , 2006 .

[5]  David P Mackinnon,et al.  Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods , 2004, Multivariate behavioral research.

[6]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[7]  Anthony E. Richardson,et al.  Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning , 2006 .

[8]  M. Hegarty,et al.  A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities , 2004 .

[9]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[10]  R. Long,et al.  Predicting environmental learning from spatial abilities: An indirect route , 1996 .

[11]  Elizabeth R. Chrastil,et al.  Active and passive contributions to spatial learning , 2011, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[12]  Heather Burte,et al.  How sense-of-direction and learning intentionality relate to spatial knowledge acquisition in the environment , 2017, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.

[13]  R. Bjork Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. , 1994 .

[14]  Atsuyuki Okabe,et al.  Wayfinding with a GPS-based mobile navigation system: A comparison with maps and direct experience , 2008 .

[15]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  Navigational Aids and Spatial Memory Impairment: The Role of Divided Attention , 2015, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[16]  Anthony E. Richardson,et al.  Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. , 2002 .

[17]  Angela Schwering,et al.  Wayfinding Through Orientation , 2017, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[18]  Toru Ishikawa,et al.  Satellite Navigation and Geospatial Awareness: Long-Term Effects of Using Navigation Tools on Wayfinding and Spatial Orientation , 2018, The Professional Geographer.

[19]  J. C. Malinowski,et al.  Mental Rotation and Real-World Wayfinding , 2001, Perceptual and motor skills.

[20]  A. Friedman,et al.  Bidimensional regression: assessing the configural similarity and accuracy of cognitive maps and other two-dimensional data sets. , 2003, Psychological methods.

[21]  M. Fisher,et al.  Evolved mechanisms underlying wayfinding. further studies on the hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences. , 2000, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[22]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Mental spatial transformations of objects and perspective , 2001, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[23]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  What determines our navigational abilities? , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Avi Parush,et al.  Degradation in Spatial Knowledge Acquisition When Using Automatic Navigation Systems , 2007, COSIT.

[25]  Kai-Florian Richter,et al.  How does navigation system behavior influence human behavior? , 2019, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.

[26]  Thomas Wolbers,et al.  Challenges for identifying the neural mechanisms that support spatial navigation: the impact of spatial scale , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[27]  Francesca Pazzaglia,et al.  Perspective, Instruction, and Cognitive Style in Spatial Representation of a Virtual Environment , 2007, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[28]  Susan D. Voyer,et al.  Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  Spatial decision dynamics during wayfinding: intersections prompt the decision-making process , 2018, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.

[30]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[31]  Chao Li,et al.  A comparison of spatial knowledge acquisition with maps and mobile maps , 2009, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[32]  S. Vandenberg,et al.  Mental Rotations, a Group Test of Three-Dimensional Spatial Visualization , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[33]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Individual Differences in Spatial Abilities , 2005 .

[34]  Daniel L. Oberski,et al.  lavaan.survey: An R Package for Complex Survey Analysis of Structural Equation Models , 2014 .

[35]  T. VanderWeele Mediation Analysis: A Practitioner's Guide. , 2016, Annual review of public health.

[36]  Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al.  Sex differences in virtual navigation influenced by scale and navigation experience , 2016, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[37]  V. Savalei,et al.  When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. , 2012, Psychological methods.

[38]  Steven M. Weisberg,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning , Memory , and Cognition Variations in Cognitive Maps : Understanding Individual Differences in Navigation , 2013 .

[39]  J. M. Dabbs,et al.  Spatial Ability, Navigation Strategy, and Geographic Knowledge Among Men and Women , 1998 .

[40]  Matthew S. Fritz,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Required Sample Size to Detect the Mediated Effect , 2022 .

[41]  Benedict C. O. F. Fehringer,et al.  Validation of a 3-factor structure of spatial strategies and relations to possession and usage of navigational aids , 2016 .

[42]  Jason T. Newsom,et al.  Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling , 2015 .

[43]  M. Hegarty,et al.  A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[44]  A. Satorra,et al.  A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis , 1999 .

[45]  D. Önder,et al.  The influence of GPS-based navigation systems on perception and image formation: A case study in urban environments , 2019, Cities.

[46]  Thomas F. Shipley,et al.  Thinking About Spatial Thinking: New Typology, New Assessments , 2015 .

[47]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[48]  Amy L Shelton,et al.  Individual skill differences and large-scale environmental learning. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.