Osteoporotic bone fragility. Detection by ultrasound transmission velocity.

We evaluated ultrasound transmission velocity at the patella as an indicator of osteoporotic fragility in 293 nonobese women. Osteoporosis was defined by atraumatic vertebral compression deformity. Ultrasound velocity averaged 1954 +/- 71 (+/- SD) m/s in premenopausal normal women and declined significantly with age after menopause, largely independently of age-related loss of spine bone mass. Postmenopausal osteoporotic women had lower velocities than normal women (-76 m/s). After allowing for slight differences in age between the groups, the difference (-54 m/s) was still significant. Women with velocities below 1825 m/s were about six times more likely to have one or more fractures than women with velocities about that level. By sensitivity-specificity analysis, ultrasound velocity discriminated between normal and osteoporotic women as well as direct measurement of spine bone mass. Ultrasound velocity measures both bone mass and a component of bone fragility distinct from decreased mass; it is a potentially valuable new tool for evaluating women for osteoporotic fragility.

[1]  C. Christiansen,et al.  Usefulness of bone mass measurements by photon absorptiometry. , 1989, Public health reports.

[2]  L. Jeffcott,et al.  Ultrasound as a tool for assessment of bone quality in the horse , 1985, Veterinary Record.

[3]  H. Wahner,et al.  Bone Density Measurement , 1988, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  L. Wright,et al.  The Use of Transmission Ultrasonics to Assess Bone Status in the Human Newborn , 1987, Pediatric Research.

[5]  R. Heaney.  Osteoporotic fracture space: an hypothesis. , 1989, Bone and mineral.

[6]  E. Keeler,et al.  Primer on certain elements of medical decision making. , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  W. Abendschein,et al.  Ultrasonics and selected physical properties of bone. , 1970, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[9]  C. Slemenda,et al.  Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study. , 1988, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[10]  R Stern,et al.  Measurement of the velocity of ultrasound in human cortical bone in vivo. Estimation of its potential value in the diagnosis of osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease. , 1981, Radiology.

[11]  R M Rose,et al.  Trabecular architecture of the human patella. , 1975, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  R. Heaney,et al.  Relation between measured and recalled body height. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  R F Kilcoyne,et al.  Ability of four different techniques of measuring bone mass to diagnose vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women , 1987, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[14]  J. Gallagher,et al.  Vertebral morphometry: normative data. , 1988, Bone and mineral.

[15]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[16]  P. Ross,et al.  Definition of a spine fracture threshold based upon prospective fracture risk. , 1987, Bone.

[17]  R Poss,et al.  The use of ultrasound in vivo to determine acute change in the mechanical properties of bone following intense physical activity. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.