Phylogenetic supertrees: Assembling the trees of life.

Systematists and comparative biologists commonly want to make statements about relationships among taxa that have never been collectively included in any single phylogenetic analysis. Construction of phylogenetic 'supertrees' provides one solution. Supertrees are estimates of phylogeny assembled from sets of smaller estimates (source trees) sharing some but not necessarily all their taxa in common. If certain conditions are met, supertrees can retain all or most of the information from the source trees and also make novel statements about relationships of taxa that do not co-occur on any one source tree. Supertrees have commonly been constructed using subjective and informal approaches, but several explicit approaches have recently been proposed.

[1]  A. Kluge,et al.  CLADISTICS: WHAT'S IN A WORD? , 1993, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[2]  W. Maddison A METHOD FOR TESTING THE CORRELATED EVOLUTION OF TWO BINARY CHARACTERS: ARE GAINS OR LOSSES CONCENTRATED ON CERTAIN BRANCHES OF A PHYLOGENETIC TREE? , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  M. Wilkinson Common Cladistic Information and its Consensus Representation: Reduced Adams and Reduced Cladistic Consensus Trees and Profiles , 1994 .

[4]  Alfred V. Aho,et al.  Inferring a Tree from Lowest Common Ancestors with an Application to the Optimization of Relational Expressions , 1981, SIAM J. Comput..

[5]  M. Pagel A method for the analysis of comparative data , 1992 .

[6]  D. Sankoff,et al.  An efficient algorithm for supertrees , 1995 .

[7]  Michael J. Sanderson,et al.  MONOPHYLY OF ANEUPLOID ASTRAGALUS (FABACEAE): EVIDENCE FROM NUCLEAR RIBOSOMAL DNA INTERNAL TRANSCRIBED SPACER SEQUENCES , 1993 .

[8]  A. D. Gordon Consensus supertrees: The synthesis of rooted trees containing overlapping sets of labeled leaves , 1986 .

[9]  M. Wilkinson,et al.  Majority-rule reduced consensus trees and their use in bootstrapping. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.

[10]  M. Pagel,et al.  The comparative method in evolutionary biology , 1991 .

[11]  A. D. Gordon A Review of Hierarchical Classification , 1987 .

[12]  B. Mishler Cladistic analysis of molecular and morphological data. , 1994, American journal of physical anthropology.

[13]  A. Grafen The phylogenetic regression. , 1989, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[14]  Theodore Garland,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of Covariance by Computer Simulation , 1993 .

[15]  B. Baum Combining trees as a way of combining data sets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees , 1992 .

[16]  Mark Kot,et al.  Adaptation: Statistics and a Null Model for Estimating Phylogenetic Effects , 1990 .

[17]  M. Sanderson,et al.  Diversification rates in a temperate legume clade: Are there “so many species” of Astragalus (Fabaceae)? , 1996 .

[18]  S. Lanyon Phylogenetic frameworks: towards a firmer foundation for the comparative approach , 1993 .

[19]  R. Graham,et al.  Unlikelihood that minimal phylogenies for a realistic biological study can be constructed in reasonable computational time , 1982 .

[20]  François-Joseph Lapointe,et al.  THE AVERAGE CONSENSUS PROCEDURE: COMBINATION OF WEIGHTED TREES CONTAINING IDENTICAL OR OVERLAPPING SETS OF TAXA , 1997 .

[21]  J. Clobert,et al.  Nest Predation and Avian Life-History Evolution in Europe Versus North America: A Possible Role of Humans? , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[22]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[23]  A. Purvis,et al.  Comparative Primate Socioecology: Phylogenetically independent comparisons and primate phylogeny , 1999 .

[24]  O. Bininda-Emonds,et al.  Properties of matrix representation with parsimony analyses. , 1998, Systematic biology.

[25]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  M. Ragan Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. , 1992, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[27]  E. -,et al.  Properties of Matrix Representation with Parsimony Analyses , 2000 .

[28]  F. Lapointe,et al.  Estimating Phylogenies from Lacunose Distance Matrices: Additive is Superior to Ultrametric Estimation , 1996 .

[29]  Andy Purvis,et al.  A Modification to Baum and Ragan's Method for Combining Phylogenetic Trees , 1995 .

[30]  M. Steel The complexity of reconstructing trees from qualitative characters and subtrees , 1992 .

[31]  R. Page Maps between trees and cladistic analysis of historical associations among genes , 1994 .

[32]  J. Wiens,et al.  Combining data sets with different numbers of taxa for phylogenetic analysis , 1995 .

[33]  F. Ronquist Matrix representation of trees, redundancy, and weighting , 1996 .

[34]  M. Donoghue,et al.  PHYLOGENIES AND THE ANALYSIS OF EVOLUTIONARY SEQUENCES, WITH EXAMPLES FROM SEED PLANTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.