Characteristics of electrically evoked 'auditory' brainstem responses elicited with the nucleus 22-electrode intracochlear implant.

Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) were measured in cochlear implant patients fitted with the Nucleus 22 electrode system. The typical response waveform consisted of a series of two to three peaks. The largest peak was similar in form to the wave V of acoustically evoked ABRs and was most prominent for stimulus intensities nearly equal to the patients' maximum comfortable (MC) behavioural stimulus level for the test electrode. The first identifiable wave V amplitude was observed at stimulus levels greater than the patients' psychophysical threshold. With increasing stimulus intensity, wave V amplitude increased rapidly to plateau at a level highly correlated with the patients' MC level at the EABR stimulus rate of 17/s. Wave V peak latency was generally shorter than normal ABRs (4.0 cf. 5.5 ms) and varied with electrode position: apical electrodes had shorter latencies than basal electrodes by approximately 0.4 ms. These results suggest that EABRs can be used as an objective estimate of a patient's electrode-specific MC level, once the correlation of EABR growth functions at 17/s to those at clinically employed rates of 250/s has been determined. EABRs may indicate differences in nerve action potential generation for apical and basal electrodes.

[1]  C. Elberling Simulation of cochlear action potentials recorded from the ear canal in man , 1976 .

[2]  A. Beiter,et al.  Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (EABR) and middle latency responses (EMLR) obtained from patients with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[3]  F. B. Simmons,et al.  Estimating Eighth Nerve Survival by Electrical Stimulation , 1983, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[4]  A. Starr,et al.  Brain Stem Potentials Evoked by Electrical Stimulation of the Cochlea in Human Subjects , 1979, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[5]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve , 1987, Hearing Research.

[6]  F O Black,et al.  Surgical Evaluation of Candidates for Cochlear Implants , 1987, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[7]  P. Kileny,et al.  Electrically evoked middle-latency auditory potentials in cochlear implant candidates. , 1987, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[8]  W. Gibson,et al.  Electrically Evoked Brain Stem Auditory Potentials , 1987 .

[9]  Carolyn J Brown,et al.  Electrically evoked brainstem potentials in cochlear implant patients with multi-electrode stimulation , 1988, Hearing Research.

[10]  F. Sharbrough,et al.  Nonpathologic Factors Influencing Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials , 1978 .

[11]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Characterization of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) in cats and humans , 1986, Hearing Research.

[12]  C Elberling,et al.  Threshold characteristics of the human auditory brain stem response. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.