Western Name Authority File: A Pilot Regional Name Authority Project

Abstract The prospect of authority control in digital libraries creates unique challenges. Digital library systems and software often do not support integrated authority control, which can create issues in consistency for personal and corporate names representation in descriptive metadata. Standard practice for library metadata is to use existing controlled vocabularies such as the Library of Congress Name Authority File, but what can be done if the personal names and corporate bodies in local or regional digital collections are not represented in the Library of Congress? As digital collection managers look towards providing metadata for regional and statewide shared repository systems and national digital collection aggregators like the Digital Public Library of America (DPLA), issues in digital collection authority control are magnified. This article explores the process in creating a shared regional authority file of personal names and corporate bodies existing in digital collection metadata records in several institutions throughout the Western United States. Steps in the process included reviewing data models, metadata collection, metadata deduplication and wrangling, vocabulary reconciliation, and data enhancement. Details on the process in making the Western Name Authority File accessible to the public and assessing project outcomes are included.

[1]  Amy Jo Hunsaker,et al.  Extending Name Authority Work beyond the Cataloging Department: A Case Study at the University of Nevada, Reno Libraries , 2018 .

[2]  Jeremy Myntti,et al.  Authority Control in a Digital Repository: Preparing for Linked Data , 2013 .

[3]  Julia Simic,et al.  From Silos to Opaquenamespace: Oregon Digital’s Migration to Linked Open Data in Hydra , 2016, Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America.

[4]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  Web Ontology Language: OWL , 2004, Handbook on Ontologies.

[5]  Kevin Clair,et al.  Developing a Tool for Publishing Linked Local Authority Data , 2015 .

[6]  Cory K. Lampert.  Looking at Linked Data from a Digital Asset Management Perspective , 2017 .

[7]  Antoine Isaac.  SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System) , 2011 .

[8]  Patricia M. Dragon.  Name Authority Control in Local Digitization Projects and the Eastern North Carolina Postcard Collection , 2009 .

[9]  Ray R. Larson.  SNAC: the social networks and archival context project , 2011, JCDL '11.

[10]  Ray R. Larson,et al.  SNAC: The Social Networks and Archival Context project - Towards an archival authority cooperative , 2014, IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries.

[11]  Jeremy Myntti,et al.  Use Existing Data First: Reconcile Metadata before Creating New Controlled Vocabularies , 2015 .

[12]  Marielle Veve.  Supporting Name Authority Control in XML Metadata: A Practical Approach at the University of Tennessee , 2009 .

[13]  Matt Carruthers,et al.  Breaking the Bottleneck: Automating the Reconciliation of Named Entities to the Library of Congress Name Authority File , 2015 .