The influence of wing morphology on the three-dimensional flow patterns of a flapping wing at bird scale

The effect of airfoil design parameters, such as airfoil thickness and camber, are well understood in steady-state aerodynamics. But this knowledge cannot be readily applied to the flapping flight in insects and birds: flow visualizations and computational analyses of flapping flight have identified that in many cases, a leading-edge vortex (LEV) contributes substantially to the generation of aerodynamic force. In flapping flight, very high angles of attack and partly separated flow are common features. Therefore, it is expected that airfoil design parameters affect flapping wing aerodynamics differently. Existing studies have focused on force measurements, which do not provide sufficient insight into the dominant flow features. To analyse the influence of wing morphology in slow-speed bird flight, the time-resolved three-dimensional flow field around different flapping wing models in translational motion at a Reynolds number of $22\,000<\mathit{Re}<26\,000$ was studied. The effect of several Strouhal numbers ( $0.2<\mathit{St}<0.4$ ), camber and thickness on the flow morphology and on the circulation was analysed. A strong LEV was found on all wing types at high $\mathit{St}$ . The vortex is stronger on thin wings and enhances the total circulation. Airfoil camber decreases the strength of the LEV, but increases the total bound circulation at the same time, due to an increase of the ‘conventional’ bound circulation at the inner half of the wing. The results provide new insights into the influence of airfoil shape on the LEV and force generation at low $\mathit{Re}$ . They contribute to a better understanding of the geometry of vertebrate wings, which seem to be optimized to benefit from LEVs in slow-speed flight.

[1]  Brian Cabral,et al.  Imaging vector fields using line integral convolution , 1993, SIGGRAPH.

[2]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Leading-edge vortices in insect flight , 1996, Nature.

[3]  G D E Povel,et al.  Leading-Edge Vortex Lifts Swifts , 2004, Science.

[4]  Ashok Gopalarathnam,et al.  Effect of airfoil shape and Reynolds number on leading edge vortex shedding in unsteady flows , 2012 .

[5]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Rotational accelerations stabilize leading edge vortices on revolving fly wings , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[6]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Time-resolved reconstruction of the full velocity field around a dynamically-scaled flapping wing , 2006 .

[7]  K. Breuer,et al.  Direct measurements of the kinematics and dynamics of bat flight , 2006, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[8]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Symmetry breaking leads to forward flapping flight , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  Damien Garcia,et al.  Robust smoothing of gridded data in one and higher dimensions with missing values , 2010, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[10]  Cameron Tropea,et al.  Experimental investigation of a flapping wing model , 2009 .

[11]  James R Usherwood,et al.  Inertia may limit efficiency of slow flapping flight, but mayflies show a strategy for reducing the power requirements of loiter , 2009, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[12]  Alexander Friedl,et al.  Measuring and Analyzing the Birds Flight , 2012 .

[13]  J. Anderson,et al.  Fundamentals of Aerodynamics , 1984 .

[14]  Yuan Lu,et al.  Three-dimensional flow structures and evolution of the leading-edge vortices on a flapping wing , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[15]  Y. Dubief,et al.  On coherent-vortex identification in turbulence , 2000 .

[16]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Flying and swimming animals cruise at a Strouhal number tuned for high power efficiency , 2003, Nature.

[17]  R. B. Srygley,et al.  Unconventional lift-generating mechanisms in free-flying butterflies , 2002, Nature.

[18]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Anatomical, morphometrical and biomechanical studies of barn owls' and pigeons' wings , 2010 .

[19]  J. Usherwood,et al.  The aerodynamics of revolving wings I. Model hawkmoth wings. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[20]  Bret W Tobalske,et al.  Biomechanics of bird flight , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[21]  W. Shyy,et al.  Aerodynamics of Low Reynolds Number Flyers , 2007 .

[22]  Z. Jane Wang,et al.  DISSECTING INSECT FLIGHT , 2005 .

[23]  Dr. Ulla M. Norberg Vertebrate Flight , 1990, Zoophysiology.

[24]  William R. Walsh,et al.  Mechanical properties of bat wing membrane skin , 1996 .

[25]  K. Dial Avian Flight , 2006 .

[26]  Ellington,et al.  A computational fluid dynamic study of hawkmoth hovering , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[27]  C. Tropea,et al.  The importance of leading edge vortices under simplified flapping flight conditions at the size scale of birds , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[28]  M. Dickinson,et al.  UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE OF MODEL WINGS AT LOW REYNOLDS NUMBERS , 1993 .

[29]  S. J. Kline,et al.  A review of quasi-coherent structures in a numerically simulated turbulent boundary layer , 1989 .

[30]  A Hedenström,et al.  The relationship between wingbeat kinematics and vortex wake of a thrush nightingale , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[31]  B. Tobalske,et al.  Aerodynamics of the hovering hummingbird , 2005, Nature.

[32]  Cameron Tropea,et al.  Characteristic length scales for vortex detachment on plunging profiles with varying leading-edge geometry , 2014, Experiments in Fluids.

[33]  Flugbiophysik von Kleinvögeln , 2004, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[34]  Herbert Oertel,et al.  Fluid–structure interaction simulation of an avian flight model , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[35]  A. Hedenström,et al.  Leading-Edge Vortex Improves Lift in Slow-Flying Bats , 2008, Science.

[36]  Dietrich Bilo,et al.  Flugbiophysik von Kleinvögeln , 1971, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[37]  D. Rockwell,et al.  FORCE PREDICTION BY PIV IMAGING: A MOMENTUM-BASED APPROACH , 1997 .

[38]  G. Haller An objective definition of a vortex , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[39]  C. Ellington,et al.  The three–dimensional leading–edge vortex of a ‘hovering’ model hawkmoth , 1997 .

[40]  Douglas L. Altshuler,et al.  Aerodynamic forces of revolving hummingbird wings and wing models , 2004 .

[41]  Jmv Rayner,et al.  Momentum and energy in the wake of a pigeon (Columba livia) in slow flight , 1984 .

[42]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  The aerodynamics of Manduca sexta: digital particle image velocimetry analysis of the leading-edge vortex , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[43]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Force production and flow structure of the leading edge vortex on flapping wings at high and low Reynolds numbers , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[44]  Azuma,et al.  Aerodynamic characteristics of the wings and body of a dragonfly , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[45]  William Thielicke,et al.  PIVlab – Towards User-friendly, Affordable and Accurate Digital Particle Image Velocimetry in MATLAB , 2014 .

[46]  C. Ellington The Aerodynamics of Hovering Insect Flight. III. Kinematics , 1984 .

[47]  Anders Hedenström,et al.  Leading edge vortex in a slow-flying passerine , 2012, Biology Letters.

[48]  Peter J. Kunz,et al.  Aerodynamics and design for ultra-low Reynolds number flight , 2003 .

[49]  Otto Lilienthal Der Vogelflug als Grundlage der Fliegekunst , 1943 .

[50]  Z. J. Wang,et al.  Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: two-dimensional computations vs robotic wing experiments , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[51]  P. Moin,et al.  Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows , 1988 .