Butler lies from both sides: actions and perceptions of unavailability management in texting

In an always-connected world, managing one's unavailability for interaction with others can be as important and difficult as coordinating mutual availability. Prior studies have identified the butler lie, a linguistic strategy commonly used to manage unavailability, and examined message-level data to examine how message senders' use of butler lies varies across media and situations. This study is the first to examine how butler lies are perceived by those who receive them. Pairs of student participants provided messages sent to each other in real conversations and indicated whether these messages were deceptive or not. These messages were then passed to the partner, who indicated perceived deception and provided an explanation. Results suggest that participants expect butler lies regularly although not as often as they are actually produced, and participants are not very accurate in identifying butler lies. Moreover, detailed analysis of messages and explanations suggests that butler lies play a relational role that is expected by both parties in a dialog.

[1]  付伶俐 打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .

[2]  Kang Lee,et al.  Chinese children's evaluations of white lies: weighing the consequences for recipients. , 2011, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[3]  A. Vrij Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities , 2008 .

[4]  Rebecca E. Grinter,et al.  Wan2tlk?: everyday text messaging , 2003, CHI '03.

[5]  Michele H. Jackson,et al.  The Connectivity Paradox: Using Technology to Both Decrease and Increase Perceptions of Distance in Distributed Work Arrangements , 2010 .

[6]  Robert M. Fano Computer-Mediated Communication , 1985, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[7]  John C. Tang Approaching and leave-taking: Negotiating contact in computer-mediated communication , 2007, TCHI.

[8]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Deception Detection and Relationship Development: The Other Side of Trust , 1986 .

[9]  Timothy R. Levine,et al.  Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: Documenting the “veracity effect” , 1999 .

[10]  Timothy R. Levine,et al.  Deception Detection Accuracy is a Predictable Linear Function of Message Veracity Base-Rate: A Formal Test of Park and Levine's Probability Model , 2006 .

[11]  K. Fiedler,et al.  Training lie detectors to use nonverbal cues instead of global heuristics , 1993 .

[12]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Lying in everyday life. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Keith Roe,et al.  White Cyberlies: The Use of Deceptive Instant Messaging Statuses as a Social Norm , 2008 .

[14]  Alexandra Weilenmann,et al.  “I Can't Talk Now, I'm in a Fitting Room”: Formulating Availability and Location in Mobile-Phone Conversations , 2003 .

[15]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Accuracy of Deception Judgments , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[16]  Brian X. Chen,et al.  Always On: How the iPhone Unlocked the Anything-Anytime-Anywhere Future--and Locked Us In , 2011 .

[17]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  "on my way": deceptive texting and interpersonal awareness narratives , 2010, CSCW '10.

[18]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Dealing with mobility: understanding access anytime, anywhere , 2001, TCHI.

[19]  M. Orne,et al.  Cognitive, Social, and Personality Processes in the Physiological Detection of Deception , 1981 .

[20]  Jonna Häkkilä,et al.  The phone rings but the user doesn't answer: unavailability in mobile communication , 2011, Mobile HCI.

[21]  Timothy R. Levine,et al.  The Prevalence of Lying in America: Three Studies of Self-Reported Lies , 2010 .

[22]  Jonna Häkkilä,et al.  'It's like if you opened someone else's letter': user perceived privacy and social practices with SMS communication , 2005, Mobile HCI.

[23]  Gerald R. Miller,et al.  Invited Article Fudging with Friends and Lying to Lovers: Deceptive Communication in Personal Relationships , 1986 .

[24]  P. Ekman,et al.  The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high-stake lies. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Butler lies: awareness, deception and design , 2009, CHI.

[26]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Deception and design: the impact of communication technology on lying behavior , 2004, CHI.

[27]  Allison Woodruff,et al.  Making space for stories: ambiguity in the design of personal communication systems , 2005, CHI.

[28]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Contact stratification and deception: blackberry messenger versus SMS use among students , 2011, CSCW '11.

[29]  Robert E. Pinsker,et al.  Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. , 2012 .

[30]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Advancing ambiguity , 2006, CHI.

[31]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Distance, ambiguity and appropriation: Structures affording impression management in a collocated organization , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..