Fragility-based sensitivity analysis on the seismic performance of pile-group-supported bridges in liquefiable ground undergoing scour potentials

Abstract Characterizing the effect of varying model parameters on the seismic performance of bridges is a desirable assistance to retrofits of existing bridges and designs of new bridges, especially for those in complex geotechnical conditions where scour and liquefaction potentials are involved. This paper aims to rank the sensitivity of fourteen structural and soil parameters for seismic performance assessment of pile-group-supported bridges in liquefiable ground undergoing scour potentials. To this end, a fragility-based Tornado diagram method for sensitivity analyses is proposed first in this study. An experimentally validated soil-foundation-bridge coupled finite element model considering scour and liquefaction effects is adopted and excited by a set of real ground motions for fragility analyses. Results indicate that the effect of scour depth slightly influence the most sensitive parameters, mainly including column height and diameter and pile diameter, for the performance of bridge components (i.e., bearing, column and pile). However, the increase of scour depth does downgrade the relative sensitivity of column-associated ones (e.g., column height and axial compressive ratio) and soil-related ones (i.e., loose and dense sand relative densities), while upgrade that of the pile-associated ones (e.g., pile diameter, center-to-center distance and longitudinal reinforcement ratio). In addition, to abide the capacity design principle that columns should fail before pile foundations, designs or retrofits of bridges using relatively larger pile diameter, column height, material strengths and longitudinal/transverse reinforcement ratios, together with smaller column diameter and pile center-to-center distance are recommended for mitigating scour and liquefaction effects on the seismic performance of pile foundations.

[1]  Aijun Ye,et al.  Selection of Input Motion for Seismic Analysis of Scoured Pile-Supported Bridge with Simplified Models , 2018, Journal of Structural Engineering.

[2]  Robert L. Mokwa,et al.  Investigation of the Resistance of Pile Caps to Lateral Loading , 1999 .

[3]  Abdollah Shafieezadeh,et al.  Optimal EDPs for Post-Earthquake Damage Assessment of Extended Pile-Shaft–Supported Bridges Subjected to Transverse Spreading , 2019, Earthquake Spectra.

[4]  Leonardo Dueñas-Osorio,et al.  Seismic response of a bridge–soil–foundation system under the combined effect of vertical and horizontal ground motions , 2013 .

[5]  Robert E. Kayen,et al.  Assessment of Liquefaction Potential during Earthquakes by Arias Intensity , 1997 .

[6]  A. Steinacker,et al.  A Spice Study of Silicon Sensor Strip Noise on Long Ladders , 2011 .

[7]  Víctor M. Taboada-Urtuzuástegui,et al.  Centrifuge modeling of seismic behavior of a slope in liquefiable soil , 2002 .

[8]  Rajesh P. Dhakal,et al.  Design of transverse reinforcement to avoid premature buckling of main bars , 2018 .

[9]  Paolo Gardoni,et al.  Closed-Form Fragility Estimates, Parameter Sensitivity, and Bayesian Updating for RC Columns , 2007 .

[10]  Leonardo Dueñas-Osorio,et al.  Optimal Intensity Measures for Probabilistic Seismic Response Analysis of Bridges on Liquefiable and Non-Liquefiable Soils , 2012 .

[11]  Ross W. Boulanger,et al.  p-y Plasticity Model for Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Piles in Liquefiable Soil , 2013 .

[12]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .

[13]  F. C. Hadipriono,et al.  ANALYSIS OF RECENT BRIDGE FAILURES IN THE UNITED STATES , 2003 .

[14]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[15]  J. M. Goicolea,et al.  Parametric Pushover Analysis on Elevated RC Pile-Cap Foundations for Bridges in Cohesionless Soils , 2019, Journal of Bridge Engineering.

[16]  Xiaowei Wang,et al.  Shake‐table investigation of scoured RC pile‐group‐supported bridges in liquefiable and nonliquefiable soils , 2019, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

[17]  Milad Bybordiani,et al.  Optimum design of steel braced frames considering dynamic soil-structure interaction , 2019, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[18]  Leonardo Dueñas-Osorio,et al.  Effects of liquefiable soil and bridge modelling parameters on the seismic reliability of critical structural components , 2010 .

[19]  Wang Xiao-wei SESIMIC RESPONSE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF PILE SUPPORTED BRIDGE STRUCTURES IN LIQUEFIABLE GROUND , 2016 .

[20]  Lu Deng,et al.  State-of-the-Art Review on the Causes and Mechanisms of Bridge Collapse , 2016 .

[21]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure , 2006 .

[22]  S. Brandenberg,et al.  Pile Foundations in Liquefied and Laterally Spreading Ground During Earthquakes: Centrifuge Experiments & Analyses , 2003 .

[23]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Spreading-Induced Damage to Short-Span Bridges in Christchurch, New Zealand , 2014 .

[24]  Leonardo Dueñas-Osorio,et al.  Influence of scour effects on the seismic response of reinforced concrete bridges , 2014 .

[25]  Ross W. Boulanger,et al.  Behavior of pile foundations in laterally spreading ground during centrifuge tests , 2005 .

[26]  A. Arias A measure of earthquake intensity , 1970 .

[27]  Ross W. Boulanger,et al.  Effects of Liquefaction on Inelastic Demands on Extended Pile Shafts , 2014 .

[28]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach , 2006 .

[29]  D. J. Wilson,et al.  SOIL-PILE-SUPERSTRUCTURE INTERACTION IN LIQUEFYING SAND AND SOFT CLAY , 1998 .

[30]  Frank McKenna,et al.  OpenSees: A Framework for Earthquake Engineering Simulation , 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[31]  Braja M. Das,et al.  Principles of Foundation Engineering , 1984 .

[32]  Leonardo Dueñas-Osorio,et al.  Influence of Soil-Structure Interaction and Liquefaction on the Isolation Efficiency of a Typical Multispan Continuous Steel Girder Bridge , 2014 .

[33]  Ross W. Boulanger,et al.  Inelastic Seismic Response of Extended Pile-Shaft-Supported Bridge Structures , 2004 .

[34]  Genda Chen,et al.  Structural Performance of Bridges in the Offshore Maule Earthquake of 27 February 2010 , 2012 .

[35]  Kuang-Yen Liu,et al.  Experimental investigation on seismic behavior of scoured bridge pier with pile foundation , 2015 .

[36]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Efficient Longitudinal Seismic Fragility Assessment of a Multispan Continuous Steel Bridge on Liquefiable Soils , 2011 .

[37]  Jian-Hua Tong,et al.  Real-time Bridge Scouring Safety Monitoring System by Using Mobile Wireless Technology , 2010, 2010 Fourth International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computing.

[38]  Xiaowei Wang,et al.  Optimal intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand modeling of extended pile-shaft-supported bridges in liquefied and laterally spreading ground , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[39]  Shideh Dashti,et al.  Ground Motion Intensity Measures to Evaluate I: The Liquefaction Hazard in the Vicinity of Shallow-Founded Structures , 2017 .

[40]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Sensitivity of Seismic Response and Fragility to Parameter Uncertainty , 2007 .

[41]  Wancheng Yuan,et al.  Seismic Fragility Analysis of Cable-Stayed Bridges Considering Different Sources of Uncertainties , 2014 .

[42]  K. Stokoe,et al.  Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity , 2000 .

[43]  Scott J. Brandenberg,et al.  Fragility Functions for Bridges in Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spreads , 2011 .

[44]  Steven L. Kramer,et al.  Performance-Based Evaluation of Bridges on Liquefiable Soils , 2007 .

[45]  Aijun Ye,et al.  Efficient Finite-Element Model for Seismic Response Estimation of Piles and Soils in Liquefied and Laterally Spreading Ground Considering Shear Localization , 2017 .

[46]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Sensitivity Study of an Older-Vintage Bridge Subjected to Lateral Spreading , 2008 .

[47]  Xiaowei Wang,et al.  Fractional order optimal intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand modeling of extended pile-shaft-supported bridges in liquefiable and laterally spreading ground , 2019 .

[48]  Knut Schjetne,et al.  Database of Friction Angles of Sand and Consolidation Characteristics of Sand, Silt, and Clay , 2013 .

[49]  V. Drnevich,et al.  Shear Modulus and Damping in Soils: Measurement and Parameter Effects (Terzaghi Leture) , 1972 .

[50]  John Douglas,et al.  Influence of the Number of Dynamic Analyses on the Accuracy of Structural Response Estimates , 2015 .

[51]  Jian-Min Zhang,et al.  Centrifuge shaking table tests on 4 × 4 pile groups in liquefiable ground , 2018, Acta Geotechnica.

[52]  Behrouz Shafei,et al.  Reliability-Based Calibration of Load and Resistance Factors for Design of RC Bridges under Multiple Extreme Events: Scour and Earthquake , 2013 .

[53]  Matjaž Dolšek,et al.  The impact of modelling uncertainties on the seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete frame buildings , 2013 .

[54]  Boris Jeremić,et al.  Numerical modeling and simulation of pile in liquefiable soil , 2009 .

[55]  Shang Yu,et al.  Quasi-Static Cyclic Testing of Elevated RC Pile-Cap Foundation for Bridge Structures , 2016 .

[56]  Alice Alipour,et al.  Assessment of structural integrity of bridges under extreme scour conditions , 2015 .

[57]  Pedro Arduino,et al.  Estimation of Uncertainty in Geotechnical Properties for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering , 2002 .

[58]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Probabilistic Push-Over Analysis of Structural and Soil-Structure Systems , 2010 .

[59]  Song-yu Liu,et al.  Investigating the resonance compaction effect on laterally loaded piles in layered soil , 2018, Engineering Geology.

[60]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Evaluating effectiveness and optimum design of isolation devices for highway bridges using the fragility function method , 2009 .