Impact of referral reward program on innovative customers' follow-up e-referral

With the rise of customer engagement in online products and services innovation, enterprises are seeking effective referral reward program (RRP) to encourage customers’ follow-up electronic-referral (e-referral) behaviors. Therefore, how to stimulate more customers to participate in the RRP is very important to enterprises. However, little empirical work has systemically investigated the impact of RRP on customers’ follow-up e-referral, as well as the moderating effects of customers’ characteristics. To fill those research gaps, the purpose of this paper is to explore the effects of RRP (particularly, reward amount and reward type) on customers’ follow-up e-referral, and the role of creative self-efficacy.,Based on the self-perception theory and the context of online customer innovation, this paper establishes a theoretical model and uses an experiment with 160 participants to test the hypotheses on the role of reward (amount and type) and the moderating effect of creative self-efficacy.,The results of the experiment suggest that both reward amount and reward type in RRP positively impact customers’ follow-up e-referral. Furthermore, customers’ creative self-efficacy moderates the relationship between rewards and customers’ follow-up e-referral. Customers with low creative self-efficacy, reward amount significantly stimulate their follow-up e-referral, but such effect is insignificant when customers’ creative self-efficacy is high. In terms of reward type, gift reward has more positive effect on customers’ follow-up e-referral when they have high (rather than low) creative self-efficacy, but cash reward has more positive effect on those with low (rather than high) creative self-efficacy.,First, based on the self-perception theory, the study clarifies the inconsistent relationship between reward and customers’ e-referral and contributes to related research. Second, the study broadens the existing research perspective by introducing creative self-efficacy, which shows interesting and powerful moderating effect but has been ignored in previous studies. Third, the study provides valuable advice on how enterprises design an effective RRP to enhance customers’ follow-up e-referral.

[1]  L. Feick,et al.  A Penny for Your Thoughts: Referral Reward Programs and Referral Likelihood , 2007 .

[2]  Qiuju Luo,et al.  Using social network analysis to explain communication characteristics of travel-related electronic word-of-mouth on social networking sites. , 2015 .

[3]  Helen S. Du,et al.  Knowledge sharing among innovative customers in a virtual innovation community: The roles of psychological capital, material reward and reciprocal relationship , 2017, Online Inf. Rev..

[4]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  What Makes Online Content Viral? , 2012 .

[5]  Kai H. Lim,et al.  Are all signals equal? Investigating the differential effects of online signals on the sales performance of e-marketplace sellers , 2015, Inf. Technol. People.

[6]  Mengze Shi,et al.  Money Talks: Field Experiment Evidence Regarding Online Referral Propensities , 2007 .

[7]  J. G. Caillier,et al.  Linking Transformational Leadership to Self-Efficacy, Extra-Role Behaviors, and Turnover Intentions in Public Agencies: The Mediating Role of Goal Clarity , 2016 .

[8]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[9]  M. Hsu,et al.  Modeling service encounters and customer experiential value in retailing , 2007 .

[10]  Tung-lung Steven Chang,et al.  The Product and Timing Effects of eWOM in Viral Marketing , 2016 .

[11]  Nikolaus Franke,et al.  The "I Designed It Myself" Effect in Mass Customization , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Maureen F. Dollard,et al.  On the positive aspects of customers: Customer‐initiated support and affective crossover in employee–customer dyads , 2011 .

[13]  Martin Benkenstein,et al.  Turning dissatisfied into satisfied customers: How referral reward programs affect the referrer׳s attitude and loyalty toward the recommended service provider , 2014 .

[14]  P. Tierney,et al.  Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance , 2002 .

[15]  J. K. Esser,et al.  Effects of delayed rewards and task interest on intrinsic motivation , 1992 .

[16]  Lawrence Feick,et al.  A Penny for Your Thoughts: Referral Reward Programs and Referral Likelihood: , 2007 .

[17]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Referral Incentives in Crowdfunding , 2014, HCOMP.

[18]  Jonah A. Berger.  Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research , 2014 .

[19]  J. Andrew Petersen,et al.  Driving Profitability by Encouraging Customer Referrals: Who, When, and How , 2010 .

[20]  Abdallah Q. Bataineh.  The Impact of Perceived e-WOM on Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Corporate Image , 2015 .

[21]  Moutusy Maity,et al.  Adolescent's eWOM intentions: An investigation into the roles of peers, the Internet and gender , 2017 .

[22]  Robert P. Leone,et al.  Driving Profitability by Encouraging Customer Referrals: Who, When, and How , 2010 .

[23]  R. Mannell,et al.  Sensitivity of Intrinsic Motivation to Reward Procedure Instructions , 1984 .

[24]  A. Alexandrov,et al.  The effects of social- and self-motives on the intentions to share positive and negative word of mouth , 2013 .

[25]  Sarah J. S. Wilner,et al.  Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities , 2009 .

[26]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychology Review.

[27]  Samuel Bowles,et al.  Economic incentives and social preferences: substitutes or complements? , 2012 .

[28]  Liyin Jin,et al.  When Giving Money Does Not Work: The Differential Effects of Monetary Versus In-Kind Rewards in Referral Reward Programs , 2013 .

[29]  R. Dhar,et al.  Fostering Employee Creativity through Transformational Leadership: Moderating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy , 2016 .

[30]  Liyin Jin,et al.  When Giving Money Does Not Work: The Differential Effects of Monetary Versus In-Kind Rewards in Referral Reward Programs , 2013 .

[31]  Cao Huarui,et al.  The Influencing Mechanism of Referral Reward Program on Referral Behavior: From the Perspective of Conflicts between Social Norm and Market Norm , 2015 .

[32]  D. Bem.  Self-Perception Theory , 1972 .

[33]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  The Role of Metaperception on the Effectiveness of Referral Reward Programs , 2013 .

[34]  S. Parker,et al.  Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: the roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  Reinhard Prügl,et al.  Lead users and the adoption and diffusion of new products: Insights from two extreme sports communities , 2006 .

[36]  Sarah J. S. Wilner,et al.  Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities , 2009 .

[37]  Jin Nam Choi,et al.  Rewards and employee creative performance: Moderating effects of creative self‐efficacy, reward importance, and locus of control , 2015 .

[38]  S. Hobfoll.  The Influence of Culture, Community, and the Nested-Self in the Stress Process: Advancing Conservation of Resources Theory , 2001 .

[39]  Ale Smidts,et al.  Sales and Sincerity: The Role of Relational Framing in Word-of-Mouth Marketing , 2008 .