Multibody Modeling of Pantographs for Pantograph-Catenary Interaction

In the great majority of railway networks the electrical power is provided to the locomotives by the pantograph-catenary system. From the mechanical point of view, the single most important feature of this system consists in the quality of the contact between the contact wire(s) of the catenary and the contact strips of the pantograph. Therefore not only the correct modeling of the catenary and of the pantograph must be achieved but also a suitable contact model to describe the interaction between the two systems must be devised. The work proposed here aims at enhancing the understanding of the dynamic behavior of the pantograph and of the interaction phenomena in the pantograph-catenary system. The catenary system is described by a detailed finite element model of the complete subsystem while the pantograph system is described by a detailed multibody model. The dynamics of each one of these models requires the use of different time integration algorithms. In particular the dynamics of the finite element model of the catenary uses a Newmark type of integration algorithm while the multibody model uses a Gear integration algorithm, which is variable order and variable time step. Therefore, an extra difficulty that arises in study of the complete catenary-pantograph interaction concerns the need for the cos-imulation of finite element and multibody models. As the gluing element between the two models is the contact model, it is through the representation of the contact and of the integration schemes applied for the finite and multibody models that the co-simulation is carried on. The work presented here proposes an integrated methodology to represent the contact between the finite element and multibody models based on a continuous contact force model that takes into account the co-simulation requirements of the integration algorithms used for each subsystem model.

[1]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  General Spatial Curve Joint for Rail Guided Vehicles: Kinematics and Dynamics , 2003 .

[2]  Werner Schiehlen,et al.  Modular Simulation in Multibody System Dynamics , 2000 .

[3]  Nathan M. Newmark,et al.  A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics , 1959 .

[4]  K. H. Hunt,et al.  Coefficient of Restitution Interpreted as Damping in Vibroimpact , 1975 .

[5]  Javier García de Jalón,et al.  Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems: The Real Time Challenge , 1994 .

[6]  Linda R. Petzold,et al.  Computational Challenges in Mechanical Systems Simulation , 1994 .

[7]  J. Ambrósio,et al.  Stabilization Methods for the Integration of DAE in the Presence of Redundant Constraints , 2003 .

[8]  C. W. Gear,et al.  Simultaneous Numerical Solution of Differential-Algebraic Equations , 1971 .

[9]  Parviz E. Nikravesh,et al.  Computer-aided analysis of mechanical systems , 1988 .

[10]  Hamid M. Lankarani,et al.  A Contact Force Model With Hysteresis Damping for Impact Analysis of Multibody Systems , 1989 .

[11]  Fabien Labergri Modélisation du comportement dynamique du système pantographe-caténaire , 2000 .

[12]  Manuel S. Pereira,et al.  Computer-Aided Analysis of Rigid and Flexible Mechanical Systems , 1994 .

[13]  Stefano Bruni,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Pantograph-Overhead Equipment Interaction , 2002 .

[14]  Ferruccio Resta,et al.  Actively controlled pantograph: an application , 2001, 2001 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8556).

[15]  J. Baumgarte Stabilization of constraints and integrals of motion in dynamical systems , 1972 .

[16]  Zheng-Dong Ma,et al.  Gluing for Dynamic Simulation of Distributed Mechanical Systems , 2005 .

[17]  Andrea Collina,et al.  On the prediction of wear of contact wire in OHE lines: a proposed model , 2002 .

[18]  Javier García de Jalón,et al.  Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems , 1994 .

[19]  L. Shampine,et al.  Computer solution of ordinary differential equations : the initial value problem , 1975 .