Impaired Communication Between the Dorsal and Ventral Stream: Indications from Apraxia

Patients with apraxia perform poorly when demonstrating how an object is used, particularly when pantomiming the action. However, these patients are able to accurately identify, and to pick up and move objects, demonstrating intact ventral and dorsal stream visuomotor processing. Appropriate object manipulation for skilled use is thought to rely on integration of known and visible object properties associated with “ventro-dorsal” stream neural processes. In apraxia, it has been suggested that stored object knowledge from the ventral stream may be less readily available to incorporate into the action plan, leading to an over-reliance on the objects’ visual affordances in object-directed motor behavior. The current study examined grasping performance in left hemisphere stroke patients with (N = 3) and without (N = 9) apraxia, and in age-matched healthy control participants (N = 14), where participants repeatedly grasped novel cylindrical objects of varying weight distribution. Across two conditions, object weight distribution was indicated by either a memory-associated cue (object color) or visual-spatial cue (visible dot over the weighted end). Participants were required to incorporate object-weight associations to effectively grasp and balance each object. Control groups appropriately adjusted their grasp according to each object’s weight distribution across each condition, whereas throughout the task two of the three apraxic patients performed poorly on both the memory-associated and visual-spatial cue conditions. A third apraxic patient seemed to compensate for these difficulties but still performed differently to control groups. Patients with apraxia performed normally on the neutral control condition when grasping the evenly weighted version. The pattern of behavior in apraxic patients suggests impaired integration of visible and known object properties attributed to the ventro-dorsal stream: in learning to grasp the weighted object accurately, apraxic patients applied neither pure knowledge-based information (the memory-associated condition) nor higher-level information given in the visual-spatial cue condition. Disruption to ventro-dorsal stream predicts that apraxic patients will have difficulty learning to manipulate new objects on the basis of information other than low-level visual cues such as shape and size.

[1]  J. Hermsdörfer,et al.  The impact of unilateral brain damage on anticipatory grip force scaling when lifting everyday objects , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  D. Mirman,et al.  Abnormal dynamics of activation of object use information in apraxia: Evidence from eyetracking , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  Frank E. Garcea,et al.  Parcellation of left parietal tool representations by functional connectivity , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  G. Vingerhoets Contribution of the posterior parietal cortex in reaching, grasping, and using objects and tools , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[5]  G. Goldenberg Apraxia – The cognitive side of motor control , 2013, Cortex.

[6]  F. Binkofski,et al.  Two action systems in the human brain , 2013, Brain and Language.

[7]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Tool manipulation knowledge is retrieved by way of the ventral visual object processing pathway , 2013, Cortex.

[8]  Alan Sunderland,et al.  Tool-use and the left hemisphere: What is lost in ideomotor apraxia? , 2013, Brain and Cognition.

[9]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Age-specific CT and MRI templates for spatial normalization , 2012, NeuroImage.

[10]  Satoshi Endo,et al.  Haptic and Visual Influences on Grasp Point Selection , 2011, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  Dana Samson,et al.  Separating forms of neglect using the Apples Test: validation and functional prediction in chronic and acute stroke. , 2011, Neuropsychology.

[12]  Will Spijkers,et al.  From pantomime to actual use: How affordances can facilitate actual tool-use , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Rizzolatti Giacomo,et al.  The Two Dorsal Visual Streams and Their Role in Perception , 2011 .

[14]  Joachim Hermsdörfer,et al.  Anticipatory scaling of grip forces when lifting objects of everyday life , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  J. Hermsdörfer,et al.  Size–weight illusion and anticipatory grip force scaling following unilateral cortical brain lesion , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  Alan Sunderland,et al.  Tool use and action planning in apraxia , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  Yong Li,et al.  Different left brain regions are essential for grasping a tool compared with its subsequent use , 2010, NeuroImage.

[18]  P. Garthwaite,et al.  Point and interval estimates of effect sizes for the case-controls design in neuropsychology: Rationale, methods, implementations, and proposed reporting standards , 2010, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[19]  Susan V. Duff,et al.  The impact of left hemisphere stroke on force control with familiar and novel objects: Neuroanatomic substrates and relationship to apraxia , 2010, Brain Research.

[20]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Action knowledge, visuomotor activation, and embodiment in the two action systems , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Impaired access to manipulation features in Apraxia: Evidence from eyetracking and semantic judgment tasks , 2010, Brain and Language.

[22]  G. Goldenberg Apraxia and the parietal lobes , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  J. Hermsdörfer,et al.  Grasping tools: Effects of task and apraxia , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  G. Schwarzer,et al.  Development of Visual Center of Mass Localization for Grasp Point Selection. , 2008 .

[25]  S. Frey What Puts the How in Where? Tool Use and the Divided Visual Streams Hypothesis , 2007, Cortex.

[26]  Alan Sunderland,et al.  Ideomotor Apraxia And Functional Ability , 2007, Cortex.

[27]  Murray Grossman,et al.  Left Inferior Parietal Representations for Skilled Hand-Object Interactions: Evidence from Stroke and Corticobasal Degeneration , 2007, Cortex.

[28]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Pantomime of tool use depends on integrity of left inferior frontal cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Sensorimotor memory of weight asymmetry in object manipulation , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  Adrienne D. Moll,et al.  Abnormal reliance on object structure in apraxics' learning of novel object-related actions , 2007, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[31]  Paul Cisek,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Improving Lesion-Symptom Mapping , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  David P. Carey,et al.  Tapping, grasping and aiming in ideomotor apraxia , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Neural substrates of knowledge of hand postures for object grasping and functional object use: Evidence from fMRI , 2006, Brain Research.

[35]  A. Sirigu,et al.  How we interact with objects: learning from brain lesions , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  K. Poeck Ideational apraxia , 2004, Journal of Neurology.

[37]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  A. Wing,et al.  Perceptual judgement, grasp point selection and object symmetry , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  A. Gordon,et al.  Selective use of visual information signaling objects' center of mass for anticipatory control of manipulative fingertip forces , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  P. Garthwaite,et al.  Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects , 2002, Brain and Language.

[43]  Magdalena Ietswaart,et al.  Memory-driven movements in limb apraxia: is there evidence for impaired communication between the dorsal and the ventral streams? , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Visual localization of the center of mass of compact, asymmetric, two-dimensional shapes. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  L. Buxbaum Ideomotor Apraxia: a Call to Action , 2001, Neurocase.

[46]  R T Knight,et al.  Neural representations of skilled movement. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[47]  G. Goldenberg,et al.  Tool use and mechanical problem solving in apraxia , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Picture naming by young children: norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1997, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[49]  G. Goldenberg Defective imitation of gestures in patients with damage in the left or right hemispheres. , 1996, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[50]  Angela Sirigu,et al.  A Selective Impairment of Hand Posture for Object Utilization in Apraxia , 1995, Cortex.

[51]  Georg Goldenberg,et al.  Imitating gestures and manipulating a mannikin—The representation of the human body in ideomotor apraxia , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[52]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[53]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[54]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[55]  J. Carr Movement Science: Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation , 1987 .

[56]  A. Gentile,et al.  Skill acquisition : Action, movement, and neuromotor processes , 1987 .

[57]  E. Renzi,et al.  Normative Data and Screening Power of a Shortened Version of the Token Test , 1978, Cortex.

[58]  B. Berle,et al.  neural substrates of , 2022 .