Evolutionary energy performance feedback for design: Multidisciplinary design optimization and performance boundaries for design decision support

Abstract In pursuit of including energy performance as feedback for architects’ early stage design decision making, this research presents the theoretical foundation of a designer oriented multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) framework titled evolutionary energy performance feedback for design (EEPFD). Through a comprehensive literature review and gap analysis EEPFD is developed into an MDO methodology that provides energy performance as feedback for influencing architects’ decision making more fluidly and earlier than other approaches to date. Secondly, in response to the lack of an MDO best practice EEPFD is investigated and evaluated through two experiments. The first experiment demonstrates the ability to utilize EEPFD provided energy performance as feedback to pursue multiple architectural designs with competing objectives and tradeoffs. The second experiment identifies performance boundaries as a best practice for MDO applications to the early stage architectural design processes. The research synthesizes the results into the basis for measuring these performance boundaries as a best practice in the context where architects must gauge multiple design concepts with varying complexity coupled with performance objectives through EEPFD, thereby enhancing the influence of energy performance feedback on the early stage design process. Finally, future research into the use of performance boundaries for conceptual energy performance design exploration is discussed.

[1]  Arno Schlueter,et al.  Building information model based energy/exergy performance assessment in early design stages , 2009 .

[2]  Denis Kelliher,et al.  ArDOT: a tool to optimise environmental design of buildings , 2003 .

[3]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  A model of the mechanical design process based on empirical data , 1988, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[4]  Leslie K. Norford,et al.  A design optimization tool based on a genetic algorithm , 2002 .

[5]  André De Herde,et al.  A simple design tool for the thermal study of an office building , 2002 .

[6]  A. Malkawi,et al.  Optimizing building form for energy performance based on hierarchical geometry relation , 2009 .

[7]  Jon Hand,et al.  CONTRASTING THE CAPABILITIES OF BUILDING ENERGY PERFORMANCE SIMULATION PROGRAMS , 2008 .

[8]  Vytautas Martinaitis,et al.  Evaluation of energy efficiency measures sustainability by decision tree method , 2014 .

[9]  Marcus M. Keane,et al.  Improving building operation by tracking performance metrics throughout the building lifecycle (BLC) , 2004 .

[10]  Koray Korkmaz,et al.  An approach for developing sensitive design parameter guidelines to reduce the energy requirements of low-rise apartment buildings , 2012 .

[11]  Ardeshir Mahdavi.  A comprehensive computational environment for performance based reasoning in building design and evaluation , 1999 .

[12]  Aldomar PEDRINI,et al.  The architects approach to the project of energy efficient office buildings in warm climate and the importance of design methods , 2005 .

[13]  Jan L M Hensen.  Energy Related Design Decisions Deserve Simulation Approach , 1994 .

[14]  Lieve Weytjens,et al.  Towards 'architect-friendly' energy evaluation tools , 2010, SpringSim.

[15]  Godfried Augenbroe,et al.  Simulation for better building design , 2004 .

[16]  Shady Attia,et al.  Selection criteria for building performance simulation tools: contrasting architects' and engineers' needs , 2012 .

[17]  Luisa Gama Caldas,et al.  An evolution-based generative design system : using adaptation to shape architectural form , 2001 .

[18]  David Jason Gerber,et al.  Designing in complexity: Simulation, integration, and multidisciplinary design optimization for architecture , 2014, Simul..

[19]  Jim Webster,et al.  Integration of building simulation into the design process of an architectural practice , 2001 .

[20]  Patrick H. T. Janssen.  An evolutionary system for design exploration , 2009 .

[21]  Shady Attia,et al.  Simulation-based decision support tool for early stages of zero-energy building design , 2012 .

[22]  Godfried Augenbroe,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making under uncertainty in building performance assessment , 2013 .

[23]  Dominik Holzer.  Optioneering in Collaborative Design Practice , 2010 .

[24]  Ralph Evins,et al.  A review of computational optimisation methods applied to sustainable building design , 2013 .

[25]  Evangelos Grigoroudis,et al.  A multi-objective decision model for the improvement of energy efficiency in buildings , 2010 .

[26]  Christina J. Hopfe,et al.  An investigation of the option space in conceptual building design for advanced building simulation , 2009, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[27]  Godfried Augenbroe,et al.  Integrated building performance evaluation in the early design stages , 1992 .

[28]  D. Robinson.  Energy model usage in building design: A qualitative assessment , 1996 .

[29]  Caroline M. Clevenger,et al.  Metrics to assess design guidance , 2011 .

[30]  John S. Gero,et al.  An Evolutionary Approach to Generating Constraint-Based Space Layout Topologies , 1997 .

[31]  Christina J. Hopfe,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in building performance simulation for decision support and design optimization , 2009 .

[32]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  Automatic rule-based checking of building designs , 2009 .

[33]  John S. Gero,et al.  Tradeoff diagrams for the integrated design of the physical environment in buildings , 1980 .

[34]  Bryan J. Urban,et al.  The MIT Design Advisor : simple and rapid energy simulation of early-stage building designs , 2007 .

[35]  Pieter de Wilde,et al.  An interoperability workbench for design analysis integration , 2004 .

[36]  Shinsuke Kato,et al.  Structural analysis of Pareto-optimal solution sets for multi-objective optimization: An application to outer window design problems using Multiple Objective Genetic Algorithms , 2010 .

[37]  Jeffrey Huang,et al.  Parametric practices: models for design exploration in architecture , 2007 .

[38]  Dennis L. Loveday,et al.  Towards the efficient use of simulation in building performance analysis: a user survey , 2003 .

[39]  Yun Kyu Yi,et al.  Site-specific optimal energy form generation based on hierarchical geometry relation , 2012 .

[40]  Godfried Augenbroe,et al.  Trends in building simulation , 2002 .

[41]  Christian Struck,et al.  On the Application of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis with Abstract Building Performance Simulation Tools , 2009 .

[42]  Fariborz Haghighat,et al.  Multiobjective optimization of building design using TRNSYS simulations, genetic algorithm, and Artificial Neural Network , 2010 .

[43]  Robert Aish,et al.  An integrated approach to algorithmic design and environmental analysis , 2011, SpringSim.

[44]  Fernanda Leite,et al.  An applied artificial intelligence approach towards assessing building performance simulation tools , 2008 .

[45]  Teemu Tiainen,et al.  Comparative study of multiple criteria decision making methods for building design , 2012, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[46]  Shih-Hsin Eve Lin.  Designing-in performance: Energy simulation feedback for early stage design decision making , 2014 .

[47]  Yehuda E. Kalay.  P3: Computational environment to support design collaboration , 1998 .

[48]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  Explorations of the cognitive processes in design , 1968 .

[49]  Shady Attia,et al.  The ‘Architect-friendliness’ Of Six Building Performance Simulation Tools: A Comparative Study , 2011 .

[50]  Ashwin Sabapathy,et al.  A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis based assessment of walling materials in India , 2013 .

[51]  Konstantinos Papamichael,et al.  Building design advisor: automated integration of multiple simulation tools , 1997 .

[52]  Ardeshir Mahdavi,et al.  SEMPER-II: an internet-based multi-domain building performance simulation environment for early design support , 2004 .

[53]  A. Chapman,et al.  ICADS; An intelligent computer-aided design environment , 1990 .

[54]  P.J.C.J. De Wilde,et al.  Computational Support for the Selection of Energy Saving Building Components , 2004 .

[55]  John Haymaker,et al.  Multidisciplinary process integration and design optimization of a classroom building , 2009, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[56]  Mark Burry,et al.  Energy-Oriented Design Tools for Collaboration in the Cloud , 2011 .

[57]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  Multi-objective optimization for building retrofit strategies: A model and an application , 2012 .

[58]  John Haymaker,et al.  ThermalOpt: A methodology for automated BIM-based multidisciplinary thermal simulation for use in optimization environments , 2011 .

[59]  Charles W. Butler,et al.  Design complexity measurement and testing , 1989, CACM.

[60]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making , 2009 .

[61]  Jonathan A. Wright,et al.  Optimization of building thermal design and control by multi-criterion genetic algorithm , 2002 .

[62]  Gregor P. Henze,et al.  Uncertainty quantification for combined building performance and cost-benefit analyses , 2013 .

[63]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes , 1999 .

[64]  John Mitchell,et al.  Collaborative design using a shared IFC building model—Learning from experience , 2007 .

[65]  Wojciech Marks,et al.  MULTICRITERIA OPTIMISATION OF SHAPE OF ENERGY-SAVING BUILDINGS , 1997 .

[66]  David Jason Gerber,et al.  Designing-in performance: A framework for evolutionary energy performance feedback in early stage design , 2014 .

[67]  Philipp Geyer,et al.  Component-oriented decomposition for multidisciplinary design optimization in building design , 2009, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[68]  Luisa Caldas.  Generation of energy-efficient architecture solutions applying GENE_ARCH: An evolution-based generative design system , 2008, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[69]  David Benjamin,et al.  Multi-objective optimization in architectural design , 2010, SpringSim.

[70]  John Haymaker,et al.  A comparison of multidisciplinary design, analysis and optimization processes in the building construction and aerospace industries , 2007 .

[71]  Jan Hensen,et al.  Introduction to building performance simulation , 2011 .

[72]  Donald E. Grierson,et al.  Pareto multi-criteria decision making , 2008, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[73]  Evangelos Grigoroudis,et al.  Decision support methodologies on the energy efficiency and energy management in buildings , 2009 .

[74]  David Jason Gerber,et al.  Designing-In Performance: A case study of a net zero energy school design , 2013 .

[75]  Salvatore Carlucci,et al.  Assessing gaps and needs for integrating building performance optimization tools in net zero energy buildings design , 2013 .

[76]  Moncef Krarti,et al.  Genetic-algorithm based approach to optimize building envelope design for residential buildings , 2010 .

[77]  Shady Attia,et al.  "ARCHITECT FRIENDLY": A COMPARISON OF TEN DIFFERENT BUILDING PERFORMANCE SIMULATION TOOLS , 2009 .

[78]  Ömer Akin,et al.  Design protocol data and novel design decisions , 1995 .

[79]  Peter Lund,et al.  Multivariate optimization of design trade-offs for solar low energy buildings , 1999 .

[80]  Shady Attia.  A Tool for Design Decision Making Zero Energy Residential Buildings in Hot Humid Climates , 2013 .

[81]  Tianzhen Hong,et al.  Building simulation: an overview of developments and information sources , 2000 .

[82]  Ulrich Bogenstätter,et al.  Prediction and optimization of life-cycle costs in early design , 2000 .

[83]  Kostas Kalaitzakis,et al.  Genetic algorithms optimized fuzzy controller for the indoor environmental management in buildings implemented using PLC and local operating networks , 2002 .

[84]  Mohammad S. Al-Homoud,et al.  Computer-aided building energy analysis techniques , 2001 .