Towards Understanding Collaborative Learning in the Social Media Environment

‘Social media’, ‘Web 2.0’, ‘collaborative learning’ and user co-creation are just some of the terms that describe changes in the role of information and communication technology (ICT) in business, private life and society. The changing face of ICT has finally brought about the fulfilment of the term ‘Information Society’ and made an important impact on many fields of research, including collaborative learning. The effective use of ICT in support of group collaboration has been researched and discussed. The effectiveness was attributed to systematically organized and facilitated processes. Nevertheless, the results are not always better when group support systems (GSS) are used in comparison to face-to-face work. In contrast to the well-organized GSS-supported learning process, the social media environment is non-structured, rule-free and even chaotic. In this paper, we research the possibilities of eliciting group knowledge in the group-learning process in a social media environment. A total of 24 students assigned into three groups participated in the three-week long study. Their task was to solve a given research topic by solely using an unfamiliar social media environment and to present their findings after three weeks. Students were observed in their natural learning environment (school, home, the Flowr virtual environment), and their attitudes on collaborative work using social media tools were measured with a questionnaire at the end of the study. The results suggest that non-structured social media environment stimulates self-management of the group. Some insights into trust, motivation and conflicts in the collaborative problem solving are discussed.

[1]  K. G. Collier Peer-Group Learning in Higher Education: The Development of Higher Order Skills. , 1980 .

[2]  Susan Brown Feichtner,et al.  Why Some Groups Fail: a Survey of Students' Experiences with Learning Groups , 1984 .

[3]  Maria Beckman Collaborative Learning: Preparation for the Workplace and Democracy?. , 1990 .

[4]  H. Simon Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning , 1991 .

[5]  Graham Wilson Problem Solving and Decision Making , 1992 .

[6]  Huaiqing Wang,et al.  Knowledge level analysis of group decision support systems , 1997 .

[7]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[8]  Tia G. B. Hansen,et al.  Collaborative Learning : Cognitive and Computational Approaches , 1999 .

[9]  Moez Limayem,et al.  Human versus automated facilitation in the GDSS context , 2002, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[10]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  The Effects of Process and Content Facilitation Restrictiveness on GSS-Mediated Collaborative Learning , 2002 .

[11]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Miroljub Kljajić,et al.  Group exploration of system dynamics models—is there a place for a feedback loop in the decision process? , 2003 .

[13]  Jerry Fjermestad,et al.  An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[14]  Jac A. M. Vennix,et al.  Exploring influencing factors on rationality: A literature review of dynamic decision making studies in system dynamics , 2004 .

[15]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything , 2006 .

[16]  Youngjin Kim Supporting Distributed Groups with Group Support Systems: A Study of the Effect of Group Leaders and Communication Modes on Group Performance , 2006, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[17]  Miroljub Kljajić,et al.  The Role of Information Feedback in the Management Group Decision-Making Process Applying System Dynamics Models , 2007 .

[18]  Shailey Minocha,et al.  An empirically‐grounded study on the effective use of social software in education , 2009 .

[19]  J. Evers Innovation 3 . 0 : Embedding into community knowledge-The relevance of trust as enabling factor for collaborative organizational learning , 2010 .

[20]  D. Dubois Breakthrough in the Human Decision Making Based on an Unconscious Origin of Free Will , 2010 .

[21]  Andrew Potter,et al.  Mass collaboration problem solving: A new approach to wicked problems , 2010, 2010 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems.

[22]  Miroljub Kljajić,et al.  The relevance of facilitation in group decision making supported by a simulation model , 2011 .