Modeling of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Patient specific vs general approaches based on finite element analysis

BACKGROUND There are two main methods used for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) FEA modeling for medical devices development: patient specific and general approaches. Advantages and disadvantages of both approaches have never been compared in a single study. METHOD Here we propose a bioinformatic algorithm to evaluate the accuracy of patient specific and generalized FEA approaches with regards to proximity configuration of the implanted stent reconstructed by computed tomography. In addition, in this study we also assessed the impact of the level of detail on FEA accuracy in the patient specific approach. RESULTS Our results demonstrate that in certain cases, the generalized approach can ensure the same accuracy as the patient specific approach. Therefore, considering high cost effectiveness of the generalized approach, we identify it as more feasible in the context of TAVR. Furthermore, we suggest that high level of detail can improve the reproducibility of modeling results in the patient specific approach. CONCLUSIONS Our findings may help medical engineers to better understand the peculiarities of both approaches and therefore make the right decision when choosing a particular approach for computer modeling. Future studies are required to validate our observations.

[1]  C Scheffer,et al.  Application of finite element analysis to the design of tissue leaflets for a percutaneous aortic valve. , 2009, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[2]  Thomas Walther,et al.  Transcatheter heart-valve replacement: update , 2010, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[3]  Ellen Kuhl,et al.  The Living Heart Project: A robust and integrative simulator for human heart function. , 2014, European journal of mechanics. A, Solids.

[4]  F Auricchio,et al.  Simulation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation through patient-specific finite element analysis: two clinical cases. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. , 2009, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  R. Contro,et al.  Computational models for biological tissues and biomedical implants , 2003 .

[7]  T Christian Gasser,et al.  Analysis of aortic wall stress and rupture risk in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm with a gender perspective. , 2011, Journal of vascular surgery.

[8]  Gábor Székely,et al.  Image-Based Mechanical Analysis of Stent Deformation: Concept and Exemplary Implementation for Aortic Valve Stents , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Silvia Schievano,et al.  Patient-specific simulations of transcatheter aortic valve stent implantation , 2012, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[10]  David M Meads,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at high operative risk , 2013, Heart.

[11]  Michel Marchand,et al.  A 25-year experience with Carpentier-Edwards Perimount in the mitral position , 2011, Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals.

[12]  Ferdinando Auricchio,et al.  Shape-memory alloys: macromodelling and numerical simulations of the superelastic behavior , 1997 .

[13]  Karen S. Frese,et al.  Towards Personalized Cardiology: Multi-Scale Modeling of the Failing Heart , 2015, PloS one.

[14]  E. Tuzcu,et al.  Markov model for selection of aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation (without replacement) in high-risk patients. , 2012, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  Philippe Ravaud,et al.  A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. , 2003, European heart journal.

[16]  E. A. Ovcharenko,et al.  Computer-aided design of the human aortic root , 2014, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[17]  Alec Vahanian,et al.  Determinants of significant paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve: implantation impact of device and annulus discongruence. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[18]  Nico Mollet,et al.  Geometry and degree of apposition of the CoreValve ReValving system with multislice computed tomography after implantation in patients with aortic stenosis. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  Ashraf Hamdan,et al.  Deformation dynamics and mechanical properties of the aortic annulus by 4-dimensional computed tomography: insights into the functional anatomy of the aortic valve complex and implications for transcatheter aortic valve therapy. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  S Tzamtzis,et al.  Numerical analysis of the radial force produced by the Medtronic-CoreValve and Edwards-SAPIEN after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.