On simulating episodic events against a background of noise-like non-episodic events

Simulation, as an art and a science, deals with the issue of allowing the practitioner to model events using their respective probability distributions. Thus, it is customary for simulations to model the behaviour of accidents, telephone calls, network failures etc. In this paper, we consider a relatively new field, namely that of modelling episodic events such as earthquakes, nuclear explosions etc. The difficulty with such a modelling process is that most of the observations appear as noise. However, when the episodic event does occur, its magnitude and features far overshadow the background, as one observes after a seismic event. In this paper, we demonstrate how the effect of a particular form of episodic event can be modelled as it propagates through the underlying background noise. Furthermore, we illustrate how the subsequent decay of the event can also be modelled and simulated. In demonstrating this concept, we utilize the exemplar scenario posed by the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), and model the propagation and decay of radionuclides, emitted from clandestine, subterranean nuclear detonations, through the background levels resulting from the global nuclear industry.

[1]  Paul L. Reeder,et al.  Field testing of collection and measurement of radioxenon for the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty , 1999 .

[2]  D. B. Turner Workbook of atmospheric dispersion estimates : an introduction to dispersion modeling , 1994 .

[3]  B Ainslie,et al.  The use of an atmospheric dispersion model to determine influence regions in the Prince George, B.C. airshed from the burning of open wood waste piles. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  F. A. Gifford,et al.  Atmospheric Dispersion Calculations Using the Generalized Gaussion Plume Model , 1960 .

[5]  David W. Aha,et al.  Generalizing from Case studies: A Case Study , 1992, ML.

[6]  N. Japkowicz,et al.  Summary of the Data Mining Contest for the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Pisa, Italy 2008. , 2008 .

[7]  Akula Venkatram,et al.  AERMOD: A dispersion model for industrial source applications. Part II: Model performance against 17 field study databases , 2005 .

[8]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Solving the Multiple Instance Problem with Axis-Parallel Rectangles , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[9]  Candis Claiborn,et al.  Development of the ClearSky smoke dispersion forecast system for agricultural field burning in the Pacific Northwest , 2007 .

[10]  David Hargreaves,et al.  Gaussian puff model of an urban street canyon , 1997 .

[11]  Nathalie Japkowicz,et al.  Concept learning in the absence of counterexamples: an autoassociation-based approach to classification , 1999 .

[12]  K. R. Peterson,et al.  Simulating the venting of radioactivity from a soviet nuclear test , 1989 .

[13]  C. N. Hewitt,et al.  Modelling and measurement of the dispersion of radioactive emissions from a nuclear fuel fabrication plant in the U.K. , 1992 .

[14]  A. Cimorelli,et al.  AERMOD: A Dispersion Model for Industrial Source Applications. Part I: General Model Formulation and Boundary Layer Characterization. , 2005 .

[15]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  One-Class Classification by Combining Density and Class Probability Estimation , 2008, ECML/PKDD.

[16]  D. Lubinsky Bivariate splits and consistent split criteria in dichotomous classification trees , 1994 .

[17]  Shigeo Abe DrEng Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.

[18]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[19]  Mukesh Khare,et al.  General plume dispersion model (GPDM) for point source emission , 2006 .

[20]  T. J. Lyons,et al.  Principles of Air Pollution Meteorology , 1990 .