Inter‐instrument comparison of particle‐size analysers

This paper presents a methodological framework for inter-instrument comparison of different particle-size analysers. The framework consists of: (i) quantifying the difference between complete particle-size distributions; (ii) identifying the best regression model for homogenizing data sets of particle-size distributions measured by different instruments; (iii) quantifying the precision of a range of particle-size analysers; and (iv) identifying the most appropriate instrument for analysing a given set of samples. The log-ratio transform is applied to particle-size distributions throughout this study to avoid the pitfalls of analysing percentage-frequency data in ‘closed-space’. A Normalized Distance statistic is used to quantify the difference between particle-size distributions and assess the performance of log-ratio regression models. Forty-six different regression models are applied to sediment samples measured by both sieve-pipette and laser analysis. Interactive quadratic regression models offer the best means of homogenizing data sets of particle-size distributions measured by different instruments into a comparable format. However, quadratic interactive log-ratio regression models require a large number of training samples (n > 80) to achieve optimal performance compared to linear regression models (n = 50). The precision of ten particle-size analysis instruments was assessed using a data set of ten replicate measurements made of four previously published silty sediment samples. Instrument precision is quantified as the median Normalized Difference measured between the ten replicate measurements made for each sediment sample. The Differentiation Power statistic is introduced to assess the ability of each instrument to detect differences between the four sediment samples. Differentiation Power scores show that instruments based on laser diffraction principles are able to differentiate most effectively between the samples of silty sediment at a 95% confidence level. Instruments applying the principles of sedimentation offer the next most precise approach.

[1]  E. E. Bray,et al.  Hydrocarbons in Sediments of Gulf of Mexico , 1956 .

[2]  R. Folk,et al.  Brazos River bar [Texas]; a study in the significance of grain size parameters , 1957 .

[3]  Hilmar von Eynatten,et al.  Statistical modelling of compositional trends in sediments , 2004 .

[4]  John Aitchison,et al.  Log-ratios and geochemical discrimination of Scottish Dalradian limestones: a case study , 2006, Geological Society Special Publication.

[5]  R. Reyment,et al.  Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology. , 1988 .

[6]  T. Pape,et al.  Laser-diffraction and pipette-method grain sizing of Dutch sediments: correlations for fine fractions of marine, fluvial, and loess samples , 2001, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences - Geologie en Mijnbouw.

[7]  Donald A. Jackson COMPOSITIONAL DATA IN COMMUNITY ECOLOGY: THE PARADIGM OR PERIL OF PROPORTIONS? , 1997 .

[8]  G. Weltje Ternary sandstone composition and provenance: an evaluation of the ‘Dickinson model’ , 2006, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[9]  Gert Jan Weltje,et al.  Numerical methods for integrating particle-size frequency distributions , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[10]  E. Molinaroli,et al.  Grain size and compositional trends of sediments from Posidonia oceanica meadows to beach shore, Sardinia, western Mediterranean , 2003 .

[11]  Raimon Tolosana-Delgado,et al.  "compositions": A unified R package to analyze compositional data , 2008, Comput. Geosci..

[12]  Hall,et al.  Measurement of the sortable silt current speed proxy using the Sedigraph 5100 and Coulter Multisizer IIe: precision and accuracy , 1999 .

[13]  G. Friedman On Sorting, Sorting Coefficients, and the Lognormality of the Grain-Size Distribution of Sandstones , 1962, The Journal of Geology.

[14]  Delwyn G. Fredlund,et al.  An equation to represent grain-size distribution , 2000 .

[15]  Dirk Goossens,et al.  Techniques to measure grain‐size distributions of loamy sediments: a comparative study of ten instruments for wet analysis , 2007 .

[16]  I. N. McCave,et al.  Laser vs. settling velocity differences in silt grainsize measurements: estimation of palaeocurrent vigour , 2006 .

[17]  J. Howe,et al.  Bottom-current variability during the last glacial-deglacial transition, Northern Rockall Trough and Faroe Bank Channel, NE Atlantic , 2009, Scottish Journal of Geology.

[18]  Douglas I. Benn,et al.  A Practical Guide to the Study of Glacial Sediments , 2004 .

[19]  D. Stauble,et al.  SEDIMENT DYNAMICS AND PROFILE INTERACTIONS: DUCK94 , 1997 .

[20]  M. C. Jones,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data , 1986 .

[21]  B. Lougheed,et al.  Experimental insights into laser diffraction particle sizing of fine‐grained sediments for use in palaeoceanography , 2009 .

[22]  N. Fieller,et al.  Statistics of Particle Size Data , 1992 .

[23]  Denise Howel,et al.  Multivariate data analysis of pollutant profiles: PCB levels across Europe. , 2007, Chemosphere.

[24]  U. Mingelgrin,et al.  Critical Evaluation of the Use of Laser Diffraction for Particle-Size Distribution Analysis , 2004 .

[25]  G. Weltje Quantitative analysis of detrital modes: statistically rigorous confidence regions in ternary diagrams and their use in sedimentary petrology , 2002 .

[26]  D. Inman,et al.  Measures for describing the size distribution of sediments , 1952 .

[27]  S. Lamoureux,et al.  A new method for visualizing sediment particle size distributions , 2002 .

[28]  O. Barndorff-Nielsen,et al.  The pattern of natural size distributions , 1980 .

[29]  G. Weltje,et al.  Muddled or mixed? Inferring palaeoclimate from size distributions of deep-sea clastics , 2003 .

[30]  J. Aitchison Logratios and Natural Laws in Compositional Data Analysis , 1999 .

[31]  R. Tolosana-Delgado,et al.  Grain-Size Control on Petrographic Composition of Sediments: Compositional Regression and Rounded Zeros , 2009 .

[32]  V. Pawlowsky-Glahn,et al.  Dealing with Zeros and Missing Values in Compositional Data Sets Using Nonparametric Imputation , 2003 .

[33]  Raimon Tolosana-Delgado,et al.  Simplifying compositional multiple regression: Application to grain size controls on sediment geochemistry , 2010, Comput. Geosci..

[34]  Jay L. Devore,et al.  Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences , 1982 .

[35]  Jef Vandenberghe,et al.  Comparison of laser grain size analysis with pipette and sieve analysis: a solution for the underestimation of the clay fraction , 1997 .

[36]  Vera Pawlowsky-Glahn,et al.  Composition and Discrimination of Sandstones: A Statistical Evaluation of Different Analytical Methods , 2003 .

[37]  L. Froyen,et al.  Grain-size analysis by laser diffractometry: comparison with the sieve-pipette method , 1998 .