The coevolutionary dynamics of cryptic female choice
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Ah-King,et al. The history of sexual selection research provides insights as to why females are still understudied , 2022, Nature Communications.
[2] Zelealem B. Yilma,et al. Selection on sperm size in response to promiscuity and variation in female sperm storage organs , 2022, bioRxiv.
[3] D. Shuker,et al. The definition of sexual selection , 2021, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.
[4] Catherine A. Rushworth,et al. Conflict over fertilization underlies the transient evolution of reinforcement , 2020, bioRxiv.
[5] J. Evans,et al. The role of female reproductive fluid in sperm competition , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.
[6] J. Belote,et al. How female × male and male × male interactions influence competitive fertilization in Drosophila melanogaster , 2020, Evolution letters.
[7] J. Fitzpatrick,et al. Chemical signals from eggs facilitate cryptic female choice in humans , 2020, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
[8] G. Machado,et al. Within‐population variation in female mating preference affects the opportunity for sexual selection and the evolution of male traits, but things are not as simple as expected , 2020, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[9] J. Henshaw,et al. Fisher's lost model of runaway sexual selection , 2019, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[10] Kohske Takahashi,et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse , 2019, J. Open Source Softw..
[11] M. Wolfner,et al. Post‐ejaculatory modifications to sperm (PEMS) , 2019, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[12] C. Gasparini,et al. Effects of ovarian fluid on sperm traits and its implications for cryptic female choice in zebrafish , 2019, Behavioral Ecology.
[13] D. Irwin. Assortative mating in hybrid zones is remarkably ineffective in promoting speciation , 2019, bioRxiv.
[14] L. Simmons,et al. Female genitalia can evolve more rapidly and divergently than male genitalia , 2019, Nature Communications.
[15] G. Parker,et al. Endless forms of sexual selection , 2019, PeerJ.
[16] S. Pitnick,et al. Sperm form and function: what do we know about the role of sexual selection? , 2018, Reproduction.
[17] J. Evans,et al. Possible glimpses into early speciation: the effect of ovarian fluid on sperm velocity accords with post‐copulatory isolation between two guppy populations , 2018, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[18] M. Servedio,et al. The Role of Sexual Selection in Local Adaptation and Speciation , 2017 .
[19] R. C. Firman,et al. Postmating Female Control: 20 Years of Cryptic Female Choice , 2017, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[20] Jussi Lehtonen. The Lambert W function in ecological and evolutionary models , 2016 .
[21] J. Belote,et al. How sexual selection can drive the evolution of costly sperm ornamentation , 2016, Nature.
[22] I. Fleming,et al. Inter-population ovarian fluid variation differentially modulates sperm motility in Atlantic cod Gadus morhua. , 2015, Journal of fish biology.
[23] R. Prum,et al. Mechanisms and Evidence of Genital Coevolution: The Roles of Natural Selection, Mate Choice, and Sexual Conflict. , 2015, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.
[24] J. Fitzpatrick,et al. Sexual selection and the evolution of sperm quality. , 2014, Molecular human reproduction.
[25] G. Bocedi,et al. Evolution of female multiple mating: A quantitative model of the “sexually selected sperm” hypothesis , 2014, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[26] Alan Edelman,et al. Julia: A Fresh Approach to Numerical Computing , 2014, SIAM Rev..
[27] Michael D. Martin,et al. Mutation-order divergence by sexual selection: diversification of sexual signals in similar environments as a first step in speciation. , 2014, Ecology letters.
[28] J. Evans,et al. Chemically moderated gamete preferences predict offspring fitness in a broadcast spawning invertebrate , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[29] R. Bürger,et al. The counterintuitive role of sexual selection in species maintenance and speciation , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[30] A. Møller,et al. Do male secondary sexual characters signal ejaculate quality? A meta‐analysis , 2013, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[31] J. Evans,et al. Quantitative genetic insights into the coevolutionary dynamics of male and female genitalia , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[32] T. Laskemoen,et al. Rapid sperm evolution in the bluethroat (Luscinia svecica) subspecies complex , 2013, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[33] F. Weissing,et al. A Guide to Sexual Selection Theory , 2012 .
[34] K. A. Segraves,et al. Female reproductive tract form drives the evolution of complex sperm morphology , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[35] G. Parker,et al. Resolving variation in the reproductive tradeoff between sperm size and number , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[36] G. Parker,et al. Sperm competition and ejaculate economics , 2010, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[37] G. Parker,et al. Sperm competition games: sperm size (mass) and number under raffle and displacement, and the evolution of P2. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.
[38] R. Montgomerie,et al. A mechanism for cryptic female choice in chinook salmon , 2008 .
[39] S. Palumbi,et al. Intraspecific divergence in sperm morphology of the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis: implications for selection in broadcast spawners , 2008, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[40] S. J. Arnold,et al. Estimating Nonlinear Selection Gradients Using Quadratic Regression Coefficients: Double Or Nothing? , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[41] L. Simmons,et al. Quantitative genetic correlation between trait and preference supports a sexually selected sperm process , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[42] S. Pitnick,et al. Complex interactions with females and rival males limit the evolution of sperm offence and defence , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[43] P. D. Lorch,et al. The evolution of conspecific gamete precedence and its effect on reinforcement , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[44] I. Folstad,et al. Effects of ovarian fluid on sperm velocity in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[45] G. Parker,et al. Sperm competition games: sperm selection by females. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.
[46] T. Markow,et al. Ejaculate-female coevolution in Drosophila mojavensis , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[47] S. Pitnick,et al. Sperm-Female Coevolution in Drosophila , 2002, Science.
[48] T. Birkhead,et al. Evolution of sex: Postcopulatory sexual selection , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[49] N. Barton,et al. Theory and speciation. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[50] D. Levitan. Sperm velocity and longevity trade off each other and influence fertilization in the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[51] A. Clark,et al. Female x male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. , 1999, Science.
[52] R. Montgomerie,et al. THE EVOLUTION OF SPERM SIZE IN BIRDS , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[53] M. Petrie,et al. VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[54] Y. Yasui. A "Good-Sperm" Model Can Explain the Evolution of Costly Multiple Mating by Females , 1997, The American Naturalist.
[55] L. Keller,et al. Why Do Females Mate with Multiple Males? The Sexually Selected Sperm Hypothesis , 1995 .
[56] G. Parker. Sperm competition games: sperm size and sperm number under adult control , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[57] Louise S. Mead,et al. Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. , 1985, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[58] R. Thornhill. Cryptic Female Choice and Its Implications in the Scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps , 1983, The American Naturalist.
[59] S. J. Arnold,et al. THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[60] M. Kirkpatrick. SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[61] R. Lande. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[62] R. Punnett,et al. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.
[63] M. Wolfner,et al. Ejaculate–female and sperm–female interactions , 2009 .
[64] T. Birkhead,et al. Sperm morphological diversity , 2009 .
[65] D. J. Howard,et al. Sperm and speciation , 2009 .
[66] R. Snook. Sperm in competition: not playing by the numbers. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[67] G. Parker. 1 – Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Ejaculates: Towards a Theory Base , 1998 .
[68] M. Kirkpatrick,et al. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek , 1991, Nature.
[69] G. Parker,et al. SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTS , 1970 .