Density-dependent home-range size revealed by spatially explicit capture–recapture

The size of animal home ranges often varies inversely with population density among populations of a species. This fact has implications for population monitoring using spatially explicit capture–recapture (SECR) models, in which both the scale of home-range movements σ and population density D usually appear as parameters, and both may vary among populations. It will often be appropriate to model a structural relationship between population-specific values of these parameters, rather than to assume independence. We suggest re-parameterizing the SECR model using kp = σp √Dp, where kp relates to the degree of overlap between home ranges and the subscript p distinguishes populations. We observe that kp is often nearly constant for populations spanning a range of densities. This justifies fitting a model in which the separate kp are replaced by the single parameter k and σp is a density-dependent derived parameter. Continuous density-dependent spatial variation in σ may also be modelled, using a scaled non-Euclidean distance between detectors and the locations of animals. We illustrate these methods with data from automatic photography of tigers Panthera tigris across India, in which the variation is among populations, from mist-netting of ovenbirds Seiurus aurocapilla in Maryland, USA, in which the variation is within a single population over time, and from live-trapping of brushtail possums Trichosurus vulpecula in New Zealand, modelling spatial variation within one population. Possible applications and limitations of the methods are discussed. A model in which kp is constant, while density varies, provides a parsimonious null model for SECR. The parameter k of the null model is a concise summary of the empirical relationship between home-range size and density that is useful in comparative studies. We expect deviations from this model, particularly the dependence of kp on covariates, to be biologically interesting.

[1]  B. Gurion,et al.  Relation between home range size and regulation of population size in Microtus ochrogaster , 1980 .

[2]  Qamar Qureshi,et al.  Evaluating capture–recapture population and density estimation of tigers in a population with known parameters , 2010 .

[3]  H. Quigley,et al.  Spatial structure of Amur (Siberian) tigers (Panthera tigris altaica) on Sikhote-Alin Biosphere Zapovednik, Russia , 2010 .

[4]  J. Andrew Royle Hierarchical Spatial Capture–Recapture Models for Estimating Density from Trapping Arrays , 2011 .

[5]  Norman A. Slade,et al.  Home Range Indices for the Hispid Cotton Rat (Sigmodon hispidus) in Northeastern Kansas , 1983 .

[6]  Jacob van Etten,et al.  R package gdistance: distances and routes on geographical grids (version 1.1-4) , 2012 .

[7]  S. Harris,et al.  Dispersal distance, home-range size and population density in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes): a quantitative analysis , 1988 .

[8]  Glen C. Sanderson,et al.  The Study of Mammal Movements: A Review , 1966 .

[9]  P. McLoughlin,et al.  A hierarchical pattern of limiting factors helps explain variation in home range size , 2000 .

[10]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[11]  U. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Connectivity of Tiger (Panthera tigris) Populations in the Human-Influenced Forest Mosaic of Central India , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  Don W. Hayne,et al.  Calculation of Size of Home Range , 1949 .

[13]  M. Efford,et al.  Compensatory heterogeneity in spatially explicit capture-recapture data. , 2014, Ecology.

[14]  Murray G Efford,et al.  Estimation of population density by spatially explicit capture-recapture analysis of data from area searches. , 2011, Ecology.

[15]  Walter Jetz,et al.  The Scaling of Animal Space Use , 2004, Science.

[16]  S. Erlinge,et al.  Density-related home-range size and overlap in adult field voles (Microtus agrestis) in southern Sweden , 1990 .

[17]  Christopher N. Johnson Relationships between body size and population density of animals : the problem of the scaling of study area in relation to body size , 1999 .

[18]  C. Carbone,et al.  Space-use scaling and home range overlap in primates , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  J. F. Benson,et al.  Regulation of space use in a solitary felid: population density or prey availability? , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  D. Kelt,et al.  The Ecology and Macroecology of Mammalian Home Range Area , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[21]  J. Damuth Home range, home range overlap, and species energy use among herbivorous mammals , 1981 .

[22]  J. Krebs Territory and breeding density in the Great Tit , 1971 .

[23]  D. Lott,et al.  A Review of Ecological Determinants of Territoriality within Vertebrate Species , 2000 .

[24]  W. H. Burt Territoriality and Home Range Concepts as Applied to Mammals , 1943 .

[25]  Craig Loehle,et al.  Complexity and the problem of ill-posed questions in ecology , 2011 .

[26]  Eldridge S. Adams,et al.  APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF TERRITORY SIZE AND SHAPE , 2001 .

[27]  T. Smith,et al.  Territory size variation in the ovenbird: the role of habitat structure. [Seiurus aurocapillus] , 1987 .

[28]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Estimating Black Bear Density Using DNA Data From Hair Snares , 2010 .

[29]  John R Fieberg,et al.  Could you please phrase “home range” as a question? , 2012 .

[30]  The Ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapilla) as a Model for Testing Food-Value Theory , 2013 .

[31]  Murray G Efford,et al.  Population density estimated from locations of individuals on a passive detector array. , 2009, Ecology.

[32]  Gary C. White,et al.  Population Estimation with Radio-Marked Animals , 2001 .

[33]  H. Steen,et al.  Home range size and overlap in female root voles: effects of season and density , 2007 .

[34]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Trap Configuration and Spacing Influences Parameter Estimates in Spatial Capture-Recapture Models , 2014, PloS one.

[35]  W. V. Winkle COMPARISON OF SEVERAL PROBABILISTIC HOME-RANGE MODELS' , 1975 .

[36]  N. Slade,et al.  Distances as Indices to Movements and Home-Range Size from Trapping Records of Small Mammals , 1998 .

[37]  G. Norbury,et al.  Population density estimates of brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) in dry grassland in New Zealand , 2013 .

[38]  JOHN FIEBERG,et al.  QUANTIFYING HOME-RANGE OVERLAP: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE UTILIZATION DISTRIBUTION , 2005 .

[39]  R. Jennrich,et al.  Measurement of non-circular home range. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  J. Faaborg,et al.  Season‐Long Fecundity, Survival, and Viability of Ovenbirds in Fragmented and Unfragmented Landscapes , 1999 .

[41]  Calhoun Jb,et al.  Calculation of home range and density of small mammals. , 1958 .

[42]  M. Villard,et al.  Putting Density Back into the Habitat‐Quality Equation: Case Study of an Open‐Nesting Forest Bird , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[43]  J. Gibbs,et al.  Estimating the Viability of Ovenbird and Kentucky Warbler Populations in Forest Fragments , 1990 .

[44]  M. Clout,et al.  Maternal influence on philopatry and space use by juvenile brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula). , 2011, The Journal of animal ecology.

[45]  J. Ross,et al.  Differences in brushtail possum home-range characteristics among sites of varying habitat and population density , 2013, Wildlife Research.

[46]  Lee R. Dice,et al.  Some Census Methods for Mammals , 1938 .

[47]  Gary C. White,et al.  Correcting wildlife counts using detection probabilities , 2005 .

[48]  M. Sunquist Chapter 2 – What Is a Tiger? Ecology and Behavior , 2010 .

[49]  M. Efford,et al.  Home-range changes by brushtail possums in response to control , 2000 .

[50]  M. Clout,et al.  Brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula Kerr) in a New Zealand beech (Nothofagus) forest , 1984 .

[51]  O. Liberg,et al.  Experimental evidence for density-dependence of home-range size in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.): a comparison of two long-term studies , 2004, Oecologia.

[52]  T. Schoener,et al.  INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN HOME-RANGE SIZE IN SOME ANOLIS LIZARDS' , 1982 .

[53]  J. Nichols,et al.  Tigers and their prey: Predicting carnivore densities from prey abundance. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  Murray G. Efford,et al.  Bird population density estimated from acoustic signals , 2009 .

[55]  Tim Coulson,et al.  An Integrated Approach to Identify Spatiotemporal and Individual‐Level Determinants of Animal Home Range Size , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[56]  D. E. Andersen,et al.  Spot‐mapping underestimates song‐territory size and use of mature forest by breeding golden‐winged warblers in Minnesota, USA , 2012 .

[57]  Mathias W. Tobler,et al.  Estimating jaguar densities with camera traps: Problems with current designs and recommendations for future studies , 2013 .

[58]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Spatial capture--recapture models for jointly estimating population density and landscape connectivity. , 2013, Ecology.

[59]  David L. Borchers,et al.  Varying effort in capture–recapture studies , 2013 .

[60]  M. Sunquist,et al.  The Social Organization of Tigers (Panthera Tigris) in Royal Chitawan National Park, Nepal , 1981 .

[61]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations , 1980 .

[62]  C. S. Robbins,et al.  DENSITY: software for analysing capture-recapture data from passive detector arrays , 2004, Animal Biodiversity and Conservation.

[63]  K. Ullas Karanth,et al.  Estimating tiger Panthera tigris populations from camera-trap data using capture-recapture models , 1995 .

[64]  A. Harestad,et al.  Home Range and Body Weight‐‐A Reevaluation , 1979 .

[65]  T. J. Benson,et al.  Estimating Territory and Home-Range Sizes: Do Singing Locations Alone Provide an Accurate Estimate of Space Use? , 2009 .

[66]  K. Hobson,et al.  Territory size and overlap in male Ovenbirds: contrasting a fragmented and contiguous boreal forest , 2004 .

[67]  Rachel M. Fewster,et al.  Estimating population size by spatially explicit capture–recapture , 2013 .

[68]  Murray G. Efford Bias from heterogeneous usage of space in spatially explicit capture–recapture analyses , 2014 .

[69]  M. Efford Density estimation in live‐trapping studies , 2004 .

[70]  D. Dawson,et al.  Occupancy in continuous habitat , 2012 .

[71]  G. Nugent,et al.  Toward eradication: the effect of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wildlife on the evolution and future direction of bovine tuberculosis management in New Zealand , 2015, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[72]  D L Borchers,et al.  Spatially Explicit Maximum Likelihood Methods for Capture–Recapture Studies , 2008, Biometrics.

[73]  David L. Borchers,et al.  Density Estimation by Spatially Explicit Capture–Recapture: Likelihood-Based Methods , 2009 .

[74]  B. McNab,et al.  Bioenergetics and the Determination of Home Range Size , 1963, The American Naturalist.

[75]  F. Messier,et al.  Intraspecific Variation in Home Range Overlap with Habitat Quality: A Comparison among Brown Bear Populations , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.