Prediction models of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A systematic review.

[1]  P. Royle,et al.  Optimal surveillance strategies for patients with stage 1 cutaneous melanoma post primary tumour excision: three systematic reviews and an economic model. , 2021, Health technology assessment.

[2]  S. Min,et al.  Risk Prediction Models for Inadvertent Intraoperative Hypothermia: A Systematic Review. , 2021, Journal of perianesthesia nursing : official journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses.

[3]  Joshua I. Rosenbloom,et al.  Prediction of successful preterm vaginal birth after cesarean among women who never delivered vaginally , 2021, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[4]  Ann Wright,et al.  A comparison of antenatal prediction models for vaginal birth after caesarean section. , 2021, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[5]  Xiaoqin Luo,et al.  Evaluation of factors that predict the success rate of trial of labor after the cesarean section , 2021, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[6]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates , 2021, BMJ Global Health.

[7]  M. Rice,et al.  Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean in term gestations: A calculator without race and ethnicity. , 2021, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  E. Mayo-Wilson,et al.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews , 2021, BMJ.

[9]  N. Assefa,et al.  Predictors of success of trial of labor after cesarean section: A nested case–control study at public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia , 2021, Women's health.

[10]  M. Upadhyay,et al.  A prospective study of a new prediction model of vaginal birth after cesarean section at a tertiary care centre , 2020, Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  Jinying Luo,et al.  Establishment of an antepartum predictive scoring model to identify candidates for vaginal birth after cesarean , 2020, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[12]  Yangyu Zhao,et al.  Development and Validation of Predictive Models for Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery in China , 2020, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[13]  A. Asefa,et al.  Validation of a Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Delivery Prediction Model in Teaching Hospitals of Addis Ababa University: A Cross-Sectional Study , 2020, BioMed research international.

[14]  Huixia Yang,et al.  The trend of caesarean birth rate changes in China after ‘universal two-child policy’ era: a population-based study in 2013–2018 , 2020, BMC Medicine.

[15]  A. Betrán,et al.  Reducing unnecessary caesarean sections: scoping review of financial and regulatory interventions , 2020, Reproductive Health.

[16]  A. Frick.  Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes. , 2020, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[17]  Zhaodong Liu,et al.  Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Southeast China: a retrospective cohort study , 2020, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[18]  Jing Luo,et al.  Verification a model of predicting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Chinese pregnant women , 2019, Medicine.

[19]  K. Källén,et al.  Third‐trimester prediction of successful vaginal birth after one cesarean delivery—A Swedish model , 2019, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[20]  A. Chang,et al.  Examining the validity of a predictive model for vaginal birth after cesarean , 2019, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[21]  Jing Lin,et al.  Establishment and validation of a prediction model for vaginal delivery after cesarean and its pregnancy outcomes-Based on a prospective study. , 2019, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[22]  S. Bhattacharya,et al.  Planned mode of delivery after previous cesarean section and short-term maternal and perinatal outcomes: A population-based record linkage cohort study in Scotland , 2019, PLoS medicine.

[23]  Yun-xiu Li,et al.  Predicting the success of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study in China , 2019, BMJ Open.

[24]  R. Hiscock,et al.  Estimating success of vaginal birth after caesarean section in a regional Australian population: Validation of a prediction model , 2019, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[25]  Karel Moons,et al.  PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration , 2019, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[26]  Yanping Xing,et al.  Development of a Modified Score System as Prediction Model for Successful Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery , 2018, Clinical and translational science.

[27]  G. Collins,et al.  PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies , 2019, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[28]  F. Barros,et al.  Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections , 2018, The Lancet.

[29]  C. Homer,et al.  Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children , 2018, The Lancet.

[30]  Cihan Çetin,et al.  The effect of advanced maternal age on perinatal outcomes in nulliparous singleton pregnancies , 2018, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[31]  Juan Liang,et al.  Prior caesarean section and likelihood of vaginal birth, 2012–2016, China , 2018, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[32]  A. Puertas,et al.  An integrated model with classification criteria to predict vaginal delivery success after cesarean section , 2018, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[33]  Shiliang Liu,et al.  Mode of delivery after a previous cesarean birth, and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity , 2018, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[34]  M. Shafiee,et al.  Antenatal scoring system in predicting the success of planned vaginal birth following one previous caesarean section , 2018, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[35]  C. Ekelund,et al.  Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes at Advanced Maternal Age. , 2018, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[36]  Xuejing Song,et al.  Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Chinese parturients , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[37]  A. Barros,et al.  Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middle income countries , 2018, British Medical Journal.

[38]  J.-B. Haumonté,et al.  French validation and adaptation of the Grobman nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. , 2017, Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction.

[39]  Mayur D. Patel,et al.  Predicting Successful Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Evaluation of Two Scoring Systems , 2018, The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India.

[40]  P. Albert,et al.  Interpregnancy weight change and adverse maternal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. , 2017, Annals of Epidemiology.

[41]  E. Gratacós,et al.  Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery at the university hospital in Barcelona , 2017, Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine.

[42]  L. Trasande,et al.  Geographic Variations and Temporal Trends in Cesarean Delivery Rates in China, 2008-2014 , 2017 .

[43]  K. Atwa,et al.  Validation of the close‐to‐delivery prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in a Middle Eastern cohort , 2016, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[44]  A. Bhide,et al.  Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery , 2016, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[45]  Y. Yogev,et al.  Prediction of successful trial of labor after cesarean – the benefit of prior vaginal delivery , 2015, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[46]  R. Mikolajczyk,et al.  Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population‐based ecological study with longitudinal data , 2015, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[47]  R. Mikolajczyk,et al.  WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates , 2015, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[48]  R. Segurado,et al.  Vaginal birth after caesarean section prediction models: a UK comparative observational study. , 2015, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[49]  K. Maršál,et al.  Predicting the chance of vaginal delivery after one cesarean section: validation and elaboration of a published prediction model. , 2015, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[50]  K. Moons,et al.  Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement , 2015, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[51]  G. Collins,et al.  Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist , 2014, PLoS medicine.

[52]  C. Lohse,et al.  Predicting Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section: A Cohort Study , 2014, Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation.

[53]  G. Kleiverda,et al.  Vaginal birth after a caesarean section: the development of a Western European population‐based prediction model for deliveries at term , 2014, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[54]  G. Stoddard,et al.  Simple, Validated Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery Prediction Model for Use at the Time of Admission , 2013, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[55]  W. Grobman,et al.  Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after caesarean. , 2013, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[56]  K. Miyazaki,et al.  Validation of the Prediction Model for Success of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Delivery in Japanese Women , 2012, International journal of medical sciences.

[57]  G. Saade,et al.  Does information available at delivery improve the accuracy of predicting vaginal birth after cesarean? Validation of the published models in an independent patient cohort. , 2011, American journal of perinatology.

[58]  M. McDonagh,et al.  Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. , 2010, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[59]  B. Sibai,et al.  Does Information Available at Admission for Delivery Improve Prediction of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean? , 2009, American journal of perinatology.

[60]  Dwight J Rouse,et al.  Development of a Nomogram for Prediction of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[61]  J. Peipert,et al.  Predicting Failure of a Vaginal Birth Attempt After Cesarean Delivery , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.