Towards a more cherishable digital object

As we go about our everyday routines we encounter and interact with numerous physical (e.g. furniture or clothes) and digital objects (e.g. photos or e-mails). Some of these objects may be particular cherished, for example because of memories attached to them. As several studies into cherished objects have shown, we have more difficulties identifying cherished digital objects than physical ones. However, cherishing a small collection of digital objects can be beneficial; e.g. it can encourage active selection of digital objects to keep and discard. This paper presents a study that aimed to increase understanding of cherished physical and digital objects, and beyond that, of how we perceive physical and digital objects, and their advantages and disadvantages. We identified design opportunities for novel products and systems that support the creation of more cherishable digital objects by extrapolating the advantages of the physical to the digital, exploiting the reasons for cherishing digital objects, and aiming for meaningful integrations of physical and digital.

[1]  Rom Harré,et al.  Material Objects in Social Worlds , 2002 .

[2]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  The Social Psychology of Experience: Studies in Remembering and Forgetting , 2005 .

[3]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Getting into the Living Memory Box: Family archives & holistic design , 2003, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[4]  E. Stolterman,et al.  How Deep Is Your Love : Deep Narratives of Ensoulment and Heirloom Status , 2011 .

[5]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  Making history: intentional capture of future memories , 2009, CHI.

[6]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  AutoTopography: what can physical mementos tell us about digital memories? , 2008, CHI.

[7]  A. Parry.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 2002 .

[8]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Alternatives: exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals , 2000, CHI.

[9]  Tiziana Catarci,et al.  Digital memories in an era of ubiquitous computing and abundant storage , 2006, CACM.

[10]  Danny Miller.  Material Culture and Mass Consumption , 1987 .

[11]  G. Brahm,et al.  Prosthetic Territories: Politics And Hypertechnologies , 1995 .

[12]  Tim Dant,et al.  Material culture in the social world : values, activities, lifestyles. , 1999 .

[13]  Danny Miller,et al.  The Comfort of Things , 2008 .

[14]  Allan Kuchinsky,et al.  Requirements for photoware , 2002, CSCW '02.

[15]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  Family memories in the home: contrasting physical and digital mementos , 2010, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[16]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Teenagers and their virtual possessions: design opportunities and issues , 2011, CHI.

[17]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  The meaning of things: Coding categories and definitions , 1981 .

[18]  Eli Blevis,et al.  Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design , 2009, CHI.

[19]  I. Woodward.  Understanding Material Culture , 2007 .

[20]  Elise van den Hoven,et al.  Facilitating parent-teenager communication through interactive photo cubes , 2011, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[21]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  On human remains: Values and practice in the home archiving of cherished objects , 2010, TCHI.

[22]  Jim Gemmell,et al.  Total Recall: How the E-Memory Revolution Will Change , 2009 .

[23]  Arthur B. VanGundy,et al.  BRAIN WRITING FOR NEW PRODUCT IDEAS: AN ALTERNATIVE TO BRAINSTORMING , 1984 .

[24]  Paul D. Clough,et al.  Easy on that trigger dad: a study of long term family photo retrieval , 2009, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.