Introducing the R2D2 Model: Online learning for the diverse learners of this world

The R2D2 method—read, reflect, display, and do—is a new model for designing and delivering distance education, and in particular, online learning. Such a model is especially important to address the diverse preferences of online learners of varied generations and varied Internet familiarity. Four quadrants can be utilized separately or as part of a problem‐solving process: the first component primarily relates to methods to help learners acquire knowledge through online readings, virtual explorations, and listening to online lectures and podcasts. As such, it addresses verbal and auditory learners. The second component of the model focuses on reflective activities such as online blogs, reflective writing tasks, self‐check examinations, and electronic portfolios. In the third quadrant, visual representations of the content are highlighted with techniques such as virtual tours, timelines, animations, and concept maps. Fourth, the model emphasizes what learners can do with the content in hands‐on activities including simulations, scenarios, and real‐time cases. In effect, the R2D2 model is one means to organize and make sense of the diverse array of instructional possibilities currently available in distance education. It provides new ways of learning for diverse online students, and demonstrates easy‐to‐apply learning activities for instructors to integrate various technologies in online learning. When thoughtfully designed, content delivered from this perspective should be more enriching for learners. The R2D2 model provides a framework for more engaging, dynamic, and responsive teaching and learning in online environments.

[1]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[2]  Jerry Willis,et al.  R2D2: A Constructivist/Interpretivist Instructional Design Model , 1999 .

[3]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[4]  Gail A. Herndon.  The chronicle of higher education , 1977 .

[5]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Authentic activities and online learning , 2002 .

[6]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[7]  I. G. Checkland,et al.  Workforce management , 1996 .

[8]  Neil D. Fleming,et al.  Not Another Inventory, Rather a Catalyst for Reflection , 1992 .

[9]  R. Garrett.  The observatory on borderless higher education , 2003 .

[10]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[11]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[12]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[13]  E. Pellicer.  Anchored Instruction and Its Relationship to Situated Cognition , 1990 .

[14]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[15]  Sarah Carr.  As Distance Education Comes of Age, the Challenge Is Keeping the Students. , 2000 .

[16]  Trey Martindale,et al.  Using weblogs in scholarship and teaching , 2004 .

[17]  Jan Herrington,et al.  Exploring student interactions in collaborative World Wide Web computer-based learning environments , 1998 .

[18]  R. Felder,et al.  Understanding Student Differences , 2005 .

[19]  Noriko Hara,et al.  We're in TITLE to Dream: Envisioning a Community of Practice, The Intraplanetary Teacher Learning Exchange , 2000, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[20]  Allan Collins,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship and Instructional Technology , 1988 .

[21]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  When researchers swim upstream: reflections on an unpopular argument about learning from media , 1991 .

[22]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Creating authentic learning environments through blended learning approaches , 2006 .

[23]  Bernice McCarthy,et al.  The 4mat System: Teaching to Learning Styles with Right-Left Mode Techniques , 1980 .

[24]  Jeffrey R. Young,et al.  "E-Portfolios" Could Give Students a New Sense of Their Accomplishments. , 2002 .

[25]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Future Directions of Blended Learning in Higher Education and Workplace Learning Settings , 2005 .

[26]  Ron Oliver,et al.  Curriculum and Learning-Resources Issues Arising From the Use of Web-Based Course Support Systems , 1999 .

[27]  N. Cole.  Conceptions of Educational Achievement , 1990 .

[28]  Jan Herrington,et al.  Multimedia, magic and the way students respond to a situated learning environment , 1997 .

[29]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments , 2003, ASCILITE.

[30]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Surveying the future of workplace e-learning: the rise of blending, interactivity, and authentic learning , 2005, ELERN.