Long-Term Results of a Standard Algorithm for Intravenous Port Implantation

Intravenous ports serve as vascular access and are indispensable in cancer treatment. Most studies are not based on a systematic and standardized approach. Hence, the aim of this study was to demonstrate long-term results of port implantation following a standard algorithm. A total of 2950 patients who underwent intravenous port implantation between March 2012 and December 2018 were included. Data of patients managed following a standard algorithm were analyzed for safety and long-term outcomes. The cephalic vein was the predominant choice of entry vessel. In female patients, wire assistance without use of puncture sheath was less likely and echo-guided puncture via internal jugular vein (IJV) with use of puncture sheath was more likely to be performed, compared to male patients (p < 0.0001). The procedure-related complication rate was 0.07%, and no pneumothorax, hematoma, catheter kinking, catheter fracture, or pocket erosion was reported. Catheter implantations by echo-guided puncture via IJV notably declined from 4.67% to 0.99% (p = 0.027). Mean operative time gradually declined from 37.88 min in 2012 to 23.20 min in 2018. The proposed standard algorithm for port implantation reduced the need for IJV echo-guided approach and eliminated procedure-related catastrophic complications. In addition, it shortened operative time and demonstrated good functional results.

[1]  Yun-hen Liu,et al.  Current port maintenance strategies are insufficient , 2019, Medicine.

[2]  T. Nagayasu,et al.  Cephalic Vein Cut-down for Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Devices With Preoperative Ultrasonography by Surgical Residents , 2019, In Vivo.

[3]  A. Yüksel,et al.  Complications and management strategies of totally implantable venous access port insertion through percutaneous subclavian vein. , 2019, Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi.

[4]  Z. Zhuang,et al.  Comparison between ultrasound-guided TIVAD via the right innominate vein and the right internal jugular vein approach , 2019, BMC Surgery.

[5]  T. Seo,et al.  Clinical outcomes of totally implantable venous access port placement via the axillary vein in patients with head and neck malignancy , 2018, The journal of vascular access.

[6]  Yun-hen Liu,et al.  View based on actual presentations of implanted ports , 2019 .

[7]  C. Chiu,et al.  Recommended irrigation volume for an intravenous port: Ex vivo simulation study , 2018, PloS one.

[8]  F. Yanık.  Experience in totally implantable venous port catheter: Analysis of 3,000 patients in 12 years. , 2018, Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi.

[9]  G. Cavallaro,et al.  A Prospective, Comparative Evaluation on Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices by External Jugular Vein versus Cephalic Vein Cutdown , 2018, The American surgeon.

[10]  Yun-hen Liu,et al.  Initial experiences with a new design for a preattached intravenous port device. , 2018, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[11]  T. Seo,et al.  Effect of catheter diameter on left innominate vein in breast cancer patients after totally implantable venous access port placement , 2018, The journal of vascular access.

[12]  T. Spencer,et al.  Reducing catheter-related thrombosis using a risk reduction tool centered on catheter to vessel ratio , 2017, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[13]  Janine Sarach,et al.  A Life-Threatening Mediastinal Hematoma After Central Venous Port System Implantation , 2015, The American journal of case reports.

[14]  Yun-hen Liu,et al.  Dose Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Precisely Predict Catheter Tip Location via Superior Vena Cava Route? , 2015, Medicine.

[15]  F. Cardoso,et al.  Central venous access in oncology: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2015, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[16]  Ching-Yang Wu,et al.  The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation , 2015, Medicine.

[17]  T. Seo,et al.  A single-incision technique for placement of implantable venous access ports via the axillary vein. , 2014, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[18]  Yun-hen Liu,et al.  Analysis of chest X-ray plain film images of intravenous ports inserted via the superior vena cava , 2014, Surgery Today.

[19]  Yun-hen Liu,et al.  A single-center study of vascular access sites for intravenous ports , 2014, Surgery Today.

[20]  P. Ko,et al.  Risk factors and possible mechanisms of intravenous port catheter migration. , 2012, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[21]  Yun-hen Liu,et al.  Risk Factors and Possible Mechanisms of Superior Vena Cava Intravenous Port Malfunction , 2012, Annals of surgery.

[22]  R. Günther,et al.  Jugular versus subclavian totally implantable access ports: catheter position, complications and intrainterventional pain perception. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[23]  Ching-Yang Wu,et al.  Catheter Fracture of Intravenous Ports and its Management , 2011, World Journal of Surgery.

[24]  So Young Lee,et al.  Catastrophic hemothorax on the contralateral side of the insertion of an implantable subclavian venous access device and the ipsilateral side of the removal of the infected port -A case report- , 2010, Korean journal of anesthesiology.

[25]  I. Di Carlo,et al.  Increased Use of Percutaneous Technique for Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices. Is It Real Progress? A 27-Year Comprehensive Review on Early Complications , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[26]  C. Tsao,et al.  Port-A-Cath Implantation Using Percutaneous Puncture Without Guidance , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[27]  S. Povoski.  A Prospective Analysis of the Cephalic Vein Cutdown Approach for Chronic Indwelling Central Venous Access in 100 Consecutive Cancer Patients , 2000, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[28]  J. Minton,et al.  The "pinch-off sign": a warning of impending problems with permanent subclavian catheters. , 1984, American journal of surgery.