Multiresponse and Multistage Metamodeling Approach for Design Optimization

[1]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Metamodels for Computer-based Engineering Design: Survey and recommendations , 2001, Engineering with Computers.

[2]  G. Matheron.  Principles of geostatistics , 1963 .

[3]  Michael James Sasena,et al.  Flexibility and efficiency enhancements for constrained global design optimization with kriging approximations. , 2002 .

[4]  Kenny Q. Ye.  Orthogonal Column Latin Hypercubes and Their Application in Computer Experiments , 1998 .

[5]  Russell R. Barton,et al.  A review on design, modeling and applications of computer experiments , 2006 .

[6]  J. Sethian,et al.  Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations , 1988 .

[7]  Cristina H. Amon,et al.  An engineering design methodology with multistage Bayesian surrogates and optimal sampling , 1996 .

[8]  T. Simpson,et al.  A Study on the Use of Kriging Models to Approximate Deterministic Computer Models , 2003, DAC 2003.

[9]  Henry P. Wynn,et al.  Maximum entropy sampling , 1987 .

[10]  T. Simpson,et al.  Use of Kriging Models to Approximate Deterministic Computer Models , 2005 .

[11]  Daniel W. Apley,et al.  Understanding the effects of model uncertainty in robust design with computer experiments , 2006, DAC 2006.

[12]  Jeong‐Soo Park.  Optimal Latin-hypercube designs for computer experiments , 1994 .

[13]  Songqing Shan,et al.  Introducing Rough Set for Design Space Exploration and Optimization , 2003, DAC 2003.

[14]  G. Allaire,et al.  Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method , 2004 .

[15]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  A Comment on Blanning's “Metamodel for Sensitivity Analysis: The Regression Metamodel in Simulation” , 1975 .

[16]  Xiaoming Wang,et al.  A level set method for structural topology optimization , 2003 .

[17]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Surrogate-based Analysis and Optimization , 2005 .

[18]  M. Sasena,et al.  Exploration of Metamodeling Sampling Criteria for Constrained Global Optimization , 2002 .

[19]  Shapour Azarm,et al.  Bayesian meta‐modelling of engineering design simulations: a sequential approach with adaptation to irregularities in the response behaviour , 2005 .

[20]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  A Taxonomy of Global Optimization Methods Based on Response Surfaces , 2001, J. Glob. Optim..

[21]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Sampling Strategies for Computer Experiments , 2001 .

[22]  K. Choi,et al.  Efficient Response Surface Modeling by Using Moving Least-Squares Method and Sensitivity , 2005 .

[23]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  The use of metamodeling techniques for optimization under uncertainty , 2001 .

[24]  T. J. Mitchell,et al.  Bayesian Prediction of Deterministic Functions, with Applications to the Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 1991 .

[25]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Application-driven sequential designs for simulation experiments: Kriging metamodelling , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[26]  Ren-Jye Yang,et al.  Approximation methods in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization: a panel discussion , 2004 .

[27]  Tiefu Shao,et al.  A hybrid method for surrogate model updating in engineering design optimization , 2007, DAC 2007.

[28]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[29]  M. E. Johnson,et al.  Minimax and maximin distance designs , 1990 .

[30]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  Metamodeling of Combined Discrete/Continuous Responses , 2001 .

[31]  T. Simpson,et al.  Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria , 2001 .

[32]  Ruichen Jin,et al.  On Sequential Sampling for Global Metamodeling in Engineering Design , 2002, DAC 2002.

[33]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Kriging Models for Global Approximation in Simulation-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization , 2001 .