Control of translation initiation: a model-based analysis from limited experimental data

We have built a detailed kinetic model of translation initiation in yeast and have used a novel approach to determine the flux controlling steps based on limited experimental data. An efficient parameter estimation method was adapted in order to fit the most uncertain parameters (rate constants) to in vivo measurements in yeast. However, it was found that there were many other sets of plausible parameter values that also gave a good fit of the model to the data. We therefore used random sampling of this uncertain parameter space to generate a large number of diverse fitted parameter sets. A compact characterization of these parameter sets was provided by considering flux control. In particular, we suggest that the rate of translation initiation is most strongly influenced by one of two reactions: either the guanine nucleotide exchange reaction involving initiation factors eIF2 and eIF2B or the assembly of the multifactor complex from its constituent protein/tRNA containing complexes. It is hoped that the approach presented in this paper will add to our understanding of translation initiation pathway and can be used to identify key system-level properties of other biochemical processes.

[1]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Intracellular translation initiation factor levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their role in cap‐complex function , 2002, Molecular microbiology.

[2]  Mats Jirstrand,et al.  Systems biology Systems Biology Toolbox for MATLAB : a computational platform for research in systems biology , 2006 .

[3]  Reinhart Heinrich,et al.  A linear steady-state treatment of enzymatic chains. General properties, control and effector strength. , 1974, European journal of biochemistry.

[4]  N. Hoyle,et al.  Dynamic cycling of eIF2 through a large eIF2B-containing cytoplasmic body , 2005, Journal of Cell Biology.

[5]  Douglas B Kell,et al.  Proximate parameter tuning for biochemical networks with uncertain kinetic parameters. , 2008, Molecular bioSystems.

[6]  A. Leach Molecular Modelling: Principles and Applications , 1996 .

[7]  E. Klipp,et al.  Bringing metabolic networks to life: convenience rate law and thermodynamic constraints , 2006, Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling.

[8]  Christopher R. Myers,et al.  Universally Sloppy Parameter Sensitivities in Systems Biology Models , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  V. Hatzimanikatis,et al.  A model for protein translation: polysome self-organization leads to maximum protein synthesis rates. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[10]  Barbara Di Ventura,et al.  From in vivo to in silico biology and back , 2006, Nature.

[11]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[12]  K. Manchester Catalysis of guanine nucleotide exchange on eIF2 by eIF2B: can it be both a substituted enzyme and a sequential mechanism? , 2001, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[13]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Metabolic channelling and control of the flux , 1993, FEBS letters.

[14]  D. Kell,et al.  High-throughput classification of yeast mutants for functional genomics using metabolic footprinting , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  A. Hinnebusch,et al.  A multifactor complex of eukaryotic initiation factors, eIF1, eIF2, eIF3, eIF5, and initiator tRNA(Met) is an important translation initiation intermediate in vivo. , 2000, Genes & development.

[16]  A. Cornish-Bowden Fundamentals of Enzyme Kinetics , 1979 .

[17]  B. Futcher,et al.  A Sampling of the Yeast Proteome , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[18]  A. Hinnebusch,et al.  eIF2 independently binds two distinct eIF2B subcomplexes that catalyze and regulate guanine-nucleotide exchange. , 1998, Genes & development.

[19]  J. Stelling,et al.  Ensemble modeling for analysis of cell signaling dynamics , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  M. Nomura,et al.  In Exponentially Growing Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cells, rRNA Synthesis Is Determined by the Summed RNA Polymerase I Loading Rate Rather than by the Number of Active Genes , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[21]  Padchanee Sangthong,et al.  Distributed control for recruitment, scanning and subunit joining steps of translation initiation , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  Richard C. Larson,et al.  Model Building in Mathematical Programming , 1979 .

[23]  Harel Weinstein,et al.  Toward realistic modeling of dynamic processes in cell signaling: quantification of macromolecular crowding effects. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[24]  D. Morris,et al.  Dynamic model of the process of protein synthesis in eukaryotic cells. , 2007, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[25]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Posttranscriptional Control of Gene Expression in Yeast , 1998, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[26]  F. Sherman Getting started with yeast. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[27]  N. Wilhelmová,et al.  Cornish-Bowden, A.:Fundamentals of Enzyme Kinetics , 1996, Biologia Plantarum.

[28]  R Heinrich,et al.  Mathematical modelling of translation of mRNA in eucaryotes; steady state, time-dependent processes and application to reticulocytes. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  D. Baker,et al.  Realistic protein–protein association rates from a simple diffusional model neglecting long‐range interactions, free energy barriers, and landscape ruggedness , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[30]  G. Pavitt,et al.  eIF2B, a mediator of general and gene-specific translational control. , 2005, Biochemical Society transactions.

[31]  S. Campbell,et al.  Localization of the Translational Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor eIF2B: A Common Theme for GEFs? , 2006, Cell cycle.

[32]  C. Proud,et al.  T-cell Activation Leads to Rapid Stimulation of Translation Initiation Factor eIF2B and Inactivation of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  Ellson Y. Chen,et al.  Overview of manual and automated DNA sequencing by the dideoxy chain termination method , 1991 .

[34]  R. Parker,et al.  Yeast Exosome Mutants Accumulate 3′-Extended Polyadenylated Forms of U4 Small Nuclear RNA and Small Nucleolar RNAs , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[35]  D. Chowdhury,et al.  Traffic of interacting ribosomes: effects of single-machine mechanochemistry on protein synthesis. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[36]  M. Sachs,et al.  Translation factor control of ribosome conformation during start codon selection. , 2007, Genes & development.

[37]  Nadav Skjøndal-Bara,et al.  Dynamic Model of the Process of Protein Synthesis in Eukaryotic Cells , 2007 .

[38]  M. Dreyfus,et al.  Translation initiation in Escherichia coli: old and new questions , 1990, Molecular microbiology.