Influence of dense‐array EEG cap on fMRI signal

Dense‐array (>64 channel) electroencephalography (EEG) systems are increasingly being used in simultaneous EEG–functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies. However, with increasing channel count, dense‐array EEG caps can induce more severe signal dropout in the MRI images than conventional systems due to the radiofrequency shielding effect of the denser wire bundle. This study investigates the influence of a 256‐channel EEG cap on MRI image quality and detection sensitivity of blood oxygen level dependent fMRI signal. A theoretical model is first established to describe the impact of the EEG cap on anatomic signal, noise, signal‐to‐noise ratio, and contrast‐to‐noise ratio of blood oxygen level dependent signal. Seven subjects were scanned to measure and compare the T2*‐weighted image quality and fMRI detection sensitivity with and without the EEG cap using an auditory/visual/sensorimotor task. The results show that the dense‐array EEG cap can substantially reduce the anatomic signal in the brain areas (visual cortex) near the conducting wires (average percent decrease ≈ 38%). However, the image signal‐to‐noise ratio with and without the EEG cap was comparable (percent decrease < 8%, not statistically significant), and there was no statistically significant difference in the extent of blood oxygen level dependent activation. This suggests that the ability to detect fMRI signal is nearly unaffected by dense‐array EEG caps in simultaneous EEG–fMRI experiments. Magn Reson Med, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  G. Glover,et al.  Self‐navigated spiral fMRI: Interleaved versus single‐shot , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  S. Debener,et al.  Effects of simultaneous EEG recording on MRI data quality at 1.5, 3 and 7 tesla. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[3]  G. Glover,et al.  Spiral‐in/out BOLD fMRI for increased SNR and reduced susceptibility artifacts , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Robert Bartha,et al.  MR compatibility of EEG scalp electrodes at 4 tesla , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  Rudolf Stollberger,et al.  RF-field mapping in vivo , 1988 .

[6]  L. Bolinger,et al.  Mapping of the Radiofrequency Field , 1993 .

[7]  G. Glover Deconvolution of Impulse Response in Event-Related BOLD fMRI1 , 1999, NeuroImage.

[8]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Rami K. Niazy,et al.  Removal of FMRI environment artifacts from EEG data using optimal basis sets , 2005, NeuroImage.

[10]  Louis Lemieux,et al.  Identification of EEG Events in the MR Scanner: The Problem of Pulse Artifact and a Method for Its Subtraction , 1998, NeuroImage.

[11]  O. Josephs,et al.  EEG recording during fMRI experiments: Image quality , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[12]  James Voyvodic,et al.  A novel method for quantifying scanner instability in fMRI , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Robert Turner,et al.  A Method for Removing Imaging Artifact from Continuous EEG Recorded during Functional MRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[14]  Daniel Brandeis,et al.  Synchronization facilitates removal of MRI artefacts from concurrent EEG recordings and increases usable bandwidth , 2006, NeuroImage.

[15]  Michiro Negishi,et al.  An EEG (electroencephalogram) recording system with carbon wire electrodes for simultaneous EEG-fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) recording , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[17]  Giorgio Bonmassar,et al.  Influence of EEG electrodes on the BOLD fMRI signal , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[18]  Louis Lemieux,et al.  Present and future of simultaneous EEG-fMRI , 2010, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[19]  M. Holmes Dense array EEG: Methodology and new hypothesis on epilepsy syndromes , 2008, Epilepsia.

[20]  Lawrence L. Wald,et al.  Comparison of physiological noise at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T and optimization of fMRI acquisition parameters , 2005, NeuroImage.

[21]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  Recent advances in recording electrophysiological data simultaneously with magnetic resonance imaging , 2008, NeuroImage.

[22]  Masato Yumoto,et al.  Stepping stone sampling for retrieving artifact-free electroencephalogram during functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, NeuroImage.

[23]  A. Sugiura,et al.  Analysis for electromagnetic leakage through a plane shield with an arbitrarily-oriented dipole source , 1992 .

[24]  W. Barber,et al.  Comparison of linear and circular polarization for magnetic resonance imaging , 1985 .

[25]  Bradley G. Goodyear,et al.  Simultaneous 3-T fMRI and high-density recording of human auditory evoked potentials , 2004, NeuroImage.

[26]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  Ultrahigh-frequency EEG during fMRI: Pushing the limits of imaging-artifact correction , 2009, NeuroImage.

[27]  G. Glover,et al.  Physiological noise in oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.