Developing an alternative formulation of SCP principles – the Ds (11 and counting)

BackgroundThe 25 Techniques of Situational Crime Prevention remain one of the bedrocks of research in Crime Science and play a key role in managing knowledge of research and practice. But they are not the only way of organising, transferring and applying this knowledge.DiscussionTaking the 25 Techniques and their theoretical underpinnings as our starting point, this paper presents the (currently) 11 Ds, a set of intervention principles which focus specifically on how the interventions are intended to influence the offender in the proximal crime situation. The context of this work was a project to help security managers detect and control attempts to undertake 'hostile reconnaissance' of public places by those planning to commit crimes or acts of terrorism. We discuss why we judged 25 Techniques as a model for emulation in general terms but unsuitable in detail for the present purpose. We also describe the process of developing the principles, which involved both reflection, and capture of new knowledge from theory and practice, including the security domain. The distinctive contribution of professional design to this process is noted. We then present the Ds themselves and show how, as generic principles, they relate to practical methods of prevention; how they can be further organised to aid their learning and their use; how they relate to other formulations such as the Conjunction of Criminal Opportunity; and how they might apply, with expansion perhaps, to the wider field of SCP.SummaryWe discuss the process and the wider benefits of developing alternative – but rigorously linked – perspectives on the same theories and phenomena both for transferring existing research knowledge to practice and for sparking leading-edge theory and research.

[1]  R. Clarke Situational Crime Prevention , 1995, Crime and Justice.

[2]  Richard Keith Wortley,et al.  Environmental criminology and crime analysis , 2008 .

[3]  Ronald V. Clarke,et al.  Become a Problem-Solving Crime Analyst , 2003 .

[4]  Paul Ekblom,et al.  Crime Prevention, Security and Community Safety Using the 5Is Framework , 2010 .

[5]  S. Henze,et al.  Crime Science: New Approaches to Preventing and Detecting Crime , 2006 .

[6]  Ronald V. Clarke,et al.  Become a Problem-solving Crime Analyst in 55 Small Steps , 2003 .

[7]  R. Clarke,et al.  The Reasoning Criminal , 2014 .

[8]  Gloria Laycock,et al.  Defining crime science , 2005 .

[9]  D. Cornish THE PROCEDURAL ANALYSIS OF OFFENDING AND ITS RELEVANCE FOR SITUATIONAL PREVENTION , 1994 .

[10]  Ronald V. Clarke,et al.  Opportunity makes the thief. Really? And so what? , 2012, Crime Science.

[11]  John E. Eck,et al.  LEARNING FROM EXPERIENCE IN PROBLEM-ORIENTED POLICING AND SITUATIONAL PREVENTION : The Positive Functions of Weak Evaluations and the Negative Functions of Strong Ones , 2006 .

[12]  Graham Farrell,et al.  Imagination for Crime Prevention: Essays in Honour of Ken Pease , 2007 .

[13]  Paul Ekblom,et al.  Happy returns: ideas brought back from situational crime prevention’s exploration of design against crime , 2011 .

[14]  P. Ekblom From the Source to the Mainstream is Uphill: The Challenge of Transferring Knowledge of Crime Prevention Through Replication, Innovation and Anticipation , 2002 .

[15]  A. Sidebottom,et al.  What Do You Mean, ‘Is It Secure?’ Redesigning Language to be Fit for the Task of Assessing the Security of Domestic and Personal Electronic Goods , 2007 .

[16]  R. Clarke Hot Products : understanding , anticipating and reducing demand for stolen goods , 1999 .

[17]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach , 1979 .

[18]  Shane D. Johnson,et al.  Imagination for Crime Prevention: Essays in Honor of Ken Pease, Crime Prevention Studies , 2007 .

[19]  Nick Tilley Knowing and doing: guidance and good practice in crime prevention , 2006 .

[20]  Johannes Knutsson,et al.  Putting theory to work : implementing situational prevention and problem-oriented policing , 2006 .

[21]  Marcus Felson,et al.  THOSE WHO DISCOURAGE CRIME , 2006 .

[22]  W. Haddon,et al.  Options for the prevention of motor vehicle crash injury. , 1980, Israel journal of medical sciences.

[23]  Allen W. Batschelet Effects-Based Operations: A New Operational Model? , 2002 .

[24]  P. Wikström,et al.  Doing without Knowing. Common Pitfalls in Crime Prevention , 2007 .

[25]  Paul Ekblom,et al.  Design against crime: crime proofing everyday objects , 2011 .

[26]  Richard Keith Wortley,et al.  Situational precipitators of crime , 2008 .

[27]  Paul Ekblom The conjunction of criminal opportunity theory , 2010 .

[28]  Paul Ekblom The security function framework: towards a systematic language , 2012 .

[29]  Noémie Bouhana,et al.  The reasoning criminal vs. Homer Simpson: conceptual challenges for crime science , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[30]  Richard Flynn,et al.  The Conjunction of Terrorist Opportunity: A Framework for Diagnosing and Preventing Acts of Terrorism , 2005 .

[31]  Nick Tilley,et al.  Understanding Car Parks, Crime and CCTV: Evaluation Lessons from Safer Cities , 1993 .

[32]  H. Goldstein PROBLEM-ORIENTED POLICING , 2002 .