Building Ambidextrous Supply Chains in SMEs: How to Tackle the Barriers?

Ambidexterity involves developing competencies to excel simultaneously on the exploration and exploitation dimensions. Few studies in literature discuss ambidexterity in a supply chain context. The research presented in this paper highlights issues that act as barriers and deserve attention in implementing ambidextrous supply chain strategy in SMEs. To develop a relationship structure existing among these variables, Interpretive Structural Modelling ISM technique is used. Further, variables' impact and dependency is calculated using Impact Matrix Cross-Reference Multiplication Applied to a Classification MICMAC approach. ISM algorithm proves to be a better tool as compared to a large-scale generic questionnaire based study due to its iterative nature that helps to bring forth issues that are difficult to identify otherwise. SMEs in India under tremendous pressure to excel on exploration and exploitation dimensions would be the major beneficiaries of this study. The hierarchy based structure and the classification of factors based on their impact and dependence, will enhance the understanding of SMEs mangers/owners to improve supply chain performance by eliminating barriers and thereby implementing ambidextrous strategy across the supply chain.

[1]  Fauzia Jabeen,et al.  Entrepreneurial mindset and the role of universities as strategic drivers of entrepreneurship , 2017 .

[2]  C. Stadler,et al.  Solutions to the Exploration/Exploitation Dilemma: Networks as a New Level of Analysis , 2013 .

[3]  Mohd. Nishat Faisal,et al.  Implementing traceability in Indian food-supply chains: An interpretive structural modeling approach , 2016 .

[4]  R. Katila,et al.  Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations , 2004 .

[5]  Carsten Zimmermann,et al.  Linking strategic flexibility and operational efficiency: the mediating role of ambidextrous operational capabilities , 2014 .

[6]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit , 2011 .

[7]  Ozden Bayazit,et al.  Investigating Adoption of E-Procurement Systems: An Empirical Study , 2014, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Supply Chain Manag..

[8]  Angeloantonio Russo,et al.  Cross‐boundary ambidexterity: Balancing exploration and exploitation in the fuel cell industry , 2010 .

[9]  Constantin Blome,et al.  Ambidextrous Governance in Supply Chains: The Impact on Innovation and Cost Performance , 2013 .

[10]  M. Tushman,et al.  The ambidextrous organization. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[11]  Akshay A. Pujara,et al.  Supply Chain Information Sharing: Modeling the Barriers , 2015, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Supply Chain Manag..

[12]  Faisal Talib,et al.  Modeling the Barriers of Indian Telecom Services Using ISM and MICMAC Approach , 2017 .

[13]  Derek K. Hitchins,et al.  Systems Engineering: A 21st Century Systems Methodology , 2007 .

[14]  Kun Chang Lee,et al.  Dynamic resource allocation for exploitation and exploration with ambidexterity: Logical mechanism and simulations , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Understanding Variation in Managers' Ambidexterity: Investigating Direct and Interaction Effects of Formal Structural and Personal Coordination Mechanisms , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[16]  R. Duane Ireland,et al.  Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating competitive advantage through streams of innovation , 2007 .

[17]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Information sharing in a supply chain , 2000, Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag..

[18]  Kenneth D. Ramsing,et al.  Manufacturing in the corporate strategy , 1979 .

[19]  Jens Leker,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Product and Process Innovation in the Chemical Industry , 2013 .

[20]  Graham Kendall,et al.  Barriers to implementation of IT in educational institutions , 2015 .

[21]  Constantine Andriopoulos,et al.  Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[22]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[23]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Path Analysis Model for Supply Chain Risk Management , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Supply Chain Manag..

[24]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .

[25]  Silvio Popadiuk,et al.  International Journal of Information Management Scale for Classifying Organizations as Explorers, Exploiters or Ambidextrous , 2022 .

[26]  Jamshed Siddiqui,et al.  Modelling the TQM enablers and IT resources in the ICT industry: an ISM-MICMAC approach , 2015 .

[27]  Hans-Christian Pfohl,et al.  Interpretive structural modeling of supply chain risks , 2011 .

[28]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[29]  V. Ravi,et al.  Analysis of interactions among barriers of eco-efficiency in electronics packaging industry , 2015 .

[30]  Virgilio Cruz-Machado,et al.  Using interpretive structural modelling to identify and rank performance measures: An application in the automotive supply chain , 2013 .

[31]  J. Swart,et al.  Mechanisms for Managing Ambidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda , 2013 .

[32]  A. Roth,et al.  The effect of an ambidextrous supply chain strategy on combinative competitive capabilities and business performance , 2010 .

[33]  D. K. Banwet,et al.  Modelling critical elements of selection for strategic alliance partner for network managed services using interpretive structural modelling (ISM) , 2013 .

[34]  Faisal Talib,et al.  Analysis of interaction among the barriers to total quality management implementation using interpretive structural modeling approach , 2011 .

[35]  Rajesh Prasad Mishra,et al.  Development of a Framework for Implementation of World-class Maintenance Systems Using Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach☆ , 2015 .

[36]  Zeki Simsek Organizational Ambidexterity: Towards a Multilevel Understanding , 2009 .

[37]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS, CONSEQUENCES AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[38]  Mohd. Nishat Faisal A study of inhibitors to transparency in red meat supply chains in Gulf cooperation council (GCC) countries , 2015, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[39]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[40]  Habib Ullah Khan,et al.  An Analysis of the Barriers to the Proliferation of M-Commerce in Qatar: A Relationship Modeling Approach , 2015, J. Syst. Inf. Technol..

[41]  M. D. M. Luzón,et al.  Ambidexterity and total quality management: towards a research agenda , 2011 .

[42]  M. Faisal,et al.  A structural analysis of the enablers of u-commerce proliferation in a developing economy , 2016 .

[43]  R. Schroeder,et al.  Antecedents to ambidexterity competency in high technology organizations , 2012 .

[44]  Surajit Bag,et al.  Big Data and Predictive Analysis is Key to Superior Supply Chain Performance: A South African Experience , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Supply Chain Manag..

[45]  Mohd. Nishat Faisal,et al.  E-Government to M-Government: A Study in a Developing Economy , 2016, Int. J. Mob. Commun..

[46]  Frank T. Rothaermel,et al.  Leveraging internal and external experience: exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance , 2010 .

[47]  Fabrice Roubelat,et al.  Structural analysis with the MICMAC method & Actor''s strategy with MACTOR method , 1999 .

[48]  M. Goh,et al.  Knowledge sharing in collaborative supply chains: twin effects of trust and power , 2013 .

[49]  Shivraj Kanungo,et al.  A structured model for evaluating information systems effectiveness , 1999 .

[50]  Mooweon Rhee,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation , 2016 .

[51]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Ambidexterity and performance in multiunit contexts: Cross‐level moderating effects of structural and resource attributes , 2012 .

[52]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2006 .

[53]  Faisal Talib,et al.  An Interpretive Structural Modeling for Sustainable Healthcare Quality Dimensions in Hospital Services , 2015 .

[54]  S. Tarba,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2013 .

[55]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance , 2012 .

[56]  Vanita Ahuja,et al.  Benefits of collaborative ICT adoption for building project management , 2009 .

[57]  Antonio Capaldo Network Structure and Innovation: The Leveraging of a Dual Network as a Distinctive Relational Capability , 2006 .

[58]  John Hulland,et al.  Innovation and efficiency: It is possible to have it all , 2009 .

[59]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  IT-enablement of supply chains: understanding the barriers , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[60]  Fabrizio Gerli,et al.  The individual side of ambidexterity: Do individuals' perceptions match actual behaviors in reconciling the exploration and exploitation trade-off? , 2014 .

[61]  In Lee,et al.  Evaluating antecedents and consequences of supply chain activities: an integrative perspective , 2010 .

[62]  Cheng-Yu Lee,et al.  Knowledge stock, ambidextrous learning, and firm performance , 2012 .

[63]  Mohd. Nishat Faisal,et al.  Modeling the enablers of organizational commitment , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[64]  H. Kulmala,et al.  Cooperative strategies in customer–supplier relationships: The role of interfirm trust , 2009 .

[65]  V. Pucik,et al.  Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value , 2005 .

[66]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[67]  K. Mathiyazhagan,et al.  Analysis of the influential pressures for green supply chain management adoption—an Indian perspective using interpretive structural modeling , 2013 .

[68]  Matthew A. Waller,et al.  Brainstorming: The common thread in TQM, empowerment, re‐engineering and continuous improvement , 1996 .

[69]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Agility in Retail Banking: A Numerical Taxonomy of Strategic Service Groups , 2001, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[70]  Sam Trowsdale,et al.  Understanding barrier interactions to support the implementation of sustainable urban water management , 2014 .

[71]  V. R. Pramod,et al.  Fuzzy ISM for Analyzing the Inhibitors of a Telecom Service Supply Chain , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Supply Chain Manag..

[72]  Dovev Lavie,et al.  Ambidexterity Under Scrutiny: Exploration and Exploitation Via Internal Organization, Alliances, and Acquisitions , 2014 .

[73]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[74]  LeeKun Chang,et al.  Dynamic resource allocation for exploitation and exploration with ambidexterity , 2015 .

[75]  S. K. Sharma,et al.  Analysis of Barriers for Reverse Logistics: An Indian Perspective , 2011 .

[76]  James Derbyshire The impact of ambidexterity on enterprise performance: Evidence from 15 countries and 14 sectors , 2014 .

[77]  N. Sanders Pattern of information technology use: The impact on buyer–suppler coordination and performance , 2008 .

[78]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Clarifying the Distinctive Contribution of Ambidexterity to the Field of Organization Studies , 2013 .

[79]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  Creating flex-lean-agile value chain by outsourcing: An ISM-based interventional roadmap , 2008, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[80]  J. Barney,et al.  Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage , 1994 .

[81]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[82]  S. Deshmukh,et al.  Vendor Selection Using Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) , 1994 .

[83]  Silvia Cantarello,et al.  A Multi‐Level Model for Organizational Ambidexterity in the Search Phase of the Innovation Process , 2012 .

[84]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[85]  Vinay Sharma,et al.  Factors affecting quality of management education in India , 2014 .

[86]  J. Swart,et al.  Ambidexterity in projects: An intellectual capital perspective , 2015 .