Superhydrophobic surfaces of the water bug Notonecta glauca: a model for friction reduction and air retention

Superhydrophobic surfaces of plants and animals are of great interest for biomimetic applications. Whereas the self-cleaning properties of superhydrophobic surfaces have been extensively investigated, their ability to retain an air film while submerged under water has not, in the past, received much attention. Nevertheless, air retaining surfaces are of great economic and ecological interest because an air film can reduce friction of solid bodies sliding through the water. This opens perspectives for biomimetic applications such as low friction fluid transport or friction reduction on ship hulls. For such applications the durability of the air film is most important. While the air film on most superhydrophobic surfaces usually lasts no longer than a few days, a few semi-aquatic plants and insects are able to hold an air film over a longer time period. Currently, we found high air film persistence under hydrostatic conditions for the elytra of the backswimmer Notonecta glauca which we therefore have chosen for further investigations. In this study, we compare the micro- and nanostructure of selected body parts (sternites, upper side of elytra, underside of elytra) in reference to their air retaining properties. Our investigations demonstrate outstanding air film persistence of the upper side of the elytra of Notonecta glauca under hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions. This hierarchically structured surface was able to hold a complete air film under hydrostatic conditions for longer than 130 days while on other body parts with simple structures the air film showed gaps (underside of elytra) or even vanished completely after a few days (sternites). Moreover, the upper side of the elytra was able to keep an air film up to flow velocities of 5 m/s. Obviously the complex surface structure with tiny dense microtrichia and two types of larger specially shaped setae is relevant for this outstanding ability. Besides high air film persistence, the observation of a considerable fluid velocity directly at the air–water interface indicates the ability to reduce friction significantly. The combination of these two abilities makes these hierarchically structured surfaces extremely interesting as a biomimetic model for low friction fluid transport or drag reduction on ship hulls.

[1]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Diversity of structure, morphology and wetting of plant surfaces , 2008 .

[2]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Dry in the Water: The Superhydrophobic Water Fern Salvinia – a Model for Biomimetic Surfaces , 2009 .

[3]  R. Adrian Particle-Imaging Techniques for Experimental Fluid Mechanics , 1991 .

[4]  J. Corbett,et al.  Updated emissions from ocean shipping , 2003 .

[5]  Terence Desmond Blake,et al.  Contact-Angle Hysteresis , 1973 .

[6]  Stephan Herminghaus,et al.  Roughness-induced non-wetting , 2000 .

[7]  Pablo Perez-Goodwyn,et al.  Anti-Wetting Surfaces in Heteroptera (Insecta): Hairy Solutions to Any Problem , 2009 .

[8]  Wilhelm Barthlott,et al.  Dry under water: Comparative morphology and functional aspects of air‐retaining insect surfaces , 2011, Journal of morphology.

[9]  A. Grigarick Aquatic insects , 2022, Nature.

[10]  Michael I. Newton,et al.  Immersed superhydrophobic surfaces: Gas exchange, slip and drag reduction properties , 2010 .

[11]  Chang-Jin C J Kim,et al.  Maximizing the giant liquid slip on superhydrophobic microstructures by nanostructuring their sidewalls. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[12]  N. Nguyen,et al.  Fundamentals and Applications of Microfluidics , 2002 .

[13]  G. Eisenbeis,et al.  Biological atlas of aquatic insects , 2002 .

[14]  G. McHale,et al.  Terminal velocity and drag reduction measurements on superhydrophobic spheres , 2009 .

[15]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Biomimetic structures for fluid drag reduction in laminar and turbulent flows , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[16]  Charles W. Heckman,et al.  Comparative morphology of arthropod exterior surfaces with the capability of binding a film of air underwater , 1983 .

[17]  D. Quéré,et al.  On water repellency , 2005 .

[18]  D. Crisp The stability of structures at a fluid interface , 1950 .

[19]  Othon K. Rediniotis,et al.  Microstructured Hydrophobic Skin for Hydrodynamic Drag Reduction , 2004 .

[20]  R. Chapman The Insects: Structure and Function , 1969 .

[21]  J. Yeomans,et al.  Superhydrophobicity on hairy surfaces. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[22]  J. Koop,et al.  New insights into a life in current: do the gill lamellae of Epeorus assimilis and Iron alpicola larvae (Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae) function as a sucker or as friction pads? , 2009 .

[23]  A. Richards,et al.  The cuticular protuberances of insects , 1979 .

[24]  Wilhelm Barthlott,et al.  Wettability and Contaminability of Insect Wings as a Function of Their Surface Sculptures , 1996 .

[25]  Moulding technique demonstrates the contribution of surface geometry to the super-hydrophobic properties of the surface of a water strider. , 2008, Acta biomaterialia.

[26]  Axel Lauer,et al.  Emissions from international shipping: 1. The last 50 years , 2005 .

[27]  Wilhelm Barthlott,et al.  Characterization and Distribution of Water-repellent, Self-cleaning Plant Surfaces , 1997 .

[28]  Abraham Marmur,et al.  Underwater superhydrophobicity: theoretical feasibility. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[29]  J. Lancaster,et al.  Introduction to Aquatic Insects , 2013 .

[30]  J. Flannagan An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America. , 1979 .

[31]  Zsófia Osváth,et al.  DOI: 10 , 2011 .

[32]  Michael Newton,et al.  Progess in superhydrophobic surface development. , 2008, Soft matter.

[33]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces , 1997, Planta.

[34]  S. Gorb Ultrastructural architecture of the microtrichia of the insect cuticle , 1997, Journal of morphology.

[35]  A. Cassie,et al.  Wettability of porous surfaces , 1944 .

[36]  R. H. Dettre,et al.  Contact Angle Hysteresis: I. Study of an Idealized Rough Surface , 1964 .

[37]  W. Thorpe PLASTRON RESPIRATION IN AQUATIC INSECTS , 1950, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[38]  Thomas Schimmel,et al.  The Salvinia Paradox: Superhydrophobic Surfaces with Hydrophilic Pins for Air Retention Under Water , 2010, Advanced materials.