From Nonlinear Identification to Linear Parameter Varying Models: Benchmark Examples

Abstract Linear parameter-varying (LPV) models form a powerful model class to analyze and control a (nonlinear) system of interest. Identifying a LPV model of a nonlinear system can be challenging due to the difficulty of selecting the scheduling variable(s) a priori, which is quite challenging in case a first principles based understanding of the system is unavailable. This paper presents a systematic LPV embedding approach starting from nonlinear fractional representation models. A nonlinear system is identified first using a nonlinear block-oriented linear fractional representation (LFR) model. This nonlinear LFR model class is embedded into the LPV model class by factorization of the static nonlinear block present in the model. As a result of the factorization a LPV-LFR or a LPV state-space model with an affine dependency results. This approach facilitates the selection of the scheduling variable from a data-driven perspective. Furthermore the estimation is not affected by measurement noise on the scheduling variables, which is often left untreated by LPV model identification methods. The proposed approach is illustrated on two well-established nonlinear modeling benchmark examples.

[1]  Johan Schoukens,et al.  Initializing Wiener-Hammerstein Models Based on Partitioning of the Best Linear Approximation , 2011 .

[2]  Carlo Novara,et al.  Linear Parameter-Varying System Identification: New Developments and Trends , 2011 .

[3]  Johan Schoukens,et al.  Three free data sets for development and benchmarking in nonlinear system identification , 2013, 2013 European Control Conference (ECC).

[4]  Hms Hossam Abbas,et al.  An improved robust model predictive control for linear parameter‐varying input‐output models , 2018 .

[5]  Gerd Vandersteen,et al.  Measurement and identification of nonlinear systems consisting of linear dynamic blocks and one static nonlinearity , 1999, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[6]  Javad Mohammadpour,et al.  Control of linear parameter varying systems with applications , 2012 .

[7]  Koen Tiels,et al.  Identification of block-oriented nonlinear systems starting from linear approximations: A survey , 2016, Autom..

[8]  Yves Rolain,et al.  Parametric identification of parallel Wiener-Hammerstein systems , 2017, Autom..

[9]  Yves Rolain,et al.  Study of the effective number of parameters in nonlinear identification benchmarks , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[10]  Jan Swevers,et al.  Identification of nonlinear systems using Polynomial Nonlinear State Space models , 2010, Autom..

[11]  Laurent Vanbeylen,et al.  Nonlinear LFR Block-Oriented Model: Potential Benefits and Improved, User-Friendly Identification Method , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[12]  Roland Toth,et al.  Modeling and Identification of Linear Parameter-Varying Systems , 2010 .

[13]  R. Tóth,et al.  Embedding of Nonlinear Systems in a Linear Parameter-Varying Representation , 2014 .

[14]  Johan Schoukens,et al.  Fast identification of systems with nonlinear feedback , 2004 .

[15]  J. R. Trapero,et al.  Recursive Estimation and Time-Series Analysis. An Introduction for the Student and Practitioner, Second edition, Peter C. Young. Springer (2011), 504 pp., Hardcover, $119.00, ISBN: 978-3-642-21980-1 , 2015 .

[16]  E. Bai,et al.  Block Oriented Nonlinear System Identification , 2010 .

[17]  L. Chisci,et al.  Gain‐scheduling MPC of nonlinear systems , 2003 .