Exploring Trade-offs in the Organization of Scientific Work: Collaboration and Scientific Reward

[1]  K. Boudreau,et al.  A Field Experiment on Search Costs and the Formation of Scientific Collaborations , 2014, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[2]  H. Sauermann,et al.  Crowd science user contribution patterns and their implications , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Credit History: The Changing Nature of Scientific Credit , 2015 .

[4]  Florenta Teodoridis,et al.  Generalists, Specialists, and the Direction of Inventive Activity , 2014 .

[5]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Specific and general information sharing among competing academic researchers , 2014 .

[6]  J. Gans,et al.  Exploring Tradeoffs in the Organization of Scientific Work: Collaboration and Scientific Reward , 2013 .

[7]  Francesco Lissoni,et al.  Inventorship and authorship as attribution rights: An enquiry into the economics of scientific credit , 2013 .

[8]  Henry Sauermann,et al.  Credit Where Credit is Due? The Impact of Project Contributions and Social Factors on Authorship and Inventorship , 2012 .

[9]  M. Tushman,et al.  External Communication and Project Performance: An Investigation Into the Role of Gatekeepers , 2011 .

[10]  Timothy S. Simcoe,et al.  Status, Quality and Attention: What’s in a (Missing) Name? ∗ , 2010 .

[11]  Scott Stern,et al.  Climbing Atop the Shoulders of Giants: The Impact of Institutions on Cumulative Research , 2006, American Economic Review.

[12]  Joon-Oh Park,et al.  The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2011 .

[13]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on Academic Scientists' Productivity and Collaboration Patterns , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Idea Generation and the Quality of the Best Idea , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Lone Inventors as Source of Breakthroughs: Myth or Reality? , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Research Note - The Researcher as a Consumer of Scientific Publications: How Do Name-Ordering Conventions Affect Inferences About Contribution Credits? , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[17]  Gino Cattani,et al.  A Core/Periphery Perspective on Individual Creative Performance: Social Networks and Cinematic Achievements in the Hollywood Film Industry , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[18]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science , 2008, Science.

[19]  A. Goshaw.  The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider , 2008 .

[20]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior , 2008, J. Documentation.

[21]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations , 2007 .

[22]  L. Fleming,et al.  Collaborative Brokerage, Generative Creativity, and Creative Success , 2007 .

[23]  Erin E Leahey,et al.  Not by Productivity Alone: How Visibility and Specialization Contribute to Academic Earnings , 2007 .

[24]  L. Fleming.  Breakthroughs and the ¿Long Tail¿ of Innovation , 2007 .

[25]  R Alexander Bentley,et al.  Why do team-authored papers get cited more? , 2007, Science.

[26]  H. Greve,et al.  Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams , 2006 .

[27]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[28]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2006, Science.

[29]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[30]  Marjori Matzke,et al.  F1000Prime recommendation of An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. , 2005 .

[31]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity , 2005 .

[32]  Mônica G. Campiteli,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research valid across disciplines , 2005, physics/0509048.

[33]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[34]  Linda Argote,et al.  Individual Experience and Experience Working Together: Predicting Learning Rates from Knowing Who Knows What and Knowing How to Work Together , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[35]  Benjamin F. Jones.  The Burden of Knowledge and the &Apos;Death of the Renaissance Man&Apos;: Is Innovation Getting Harder? , 2005 .

[36]  David Obstfeld.  Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[37]  D. Stokols,et al.  In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration Lessons learned and implications for active living research. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[38]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  Local, Domestic and International Scientific Collaboration in Biomedical Research , 1996, Scientometrics.

[39]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Studies in scientific collaboration , 2005, Scientometrics.

[40]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[41]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Scientific Teams and Institution Collaborations: Evidence from U.S. Universities, 1981-1999 , 2004 .

[42]  G. Bowker,et al.  Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: a comparative case study of two scientific teams , 2004 .

[43]  Jonathon N. Cummings.  Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[44]  Debora Shaw,et al.  Visible, less visible, and invisible work: Patterns of collaboration in 20th century chemistry , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[45]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study): Past, Present, and Future , 2001, Scientometrics.

[46]  Frans. Johansson,et al.  The Medici Effect: Breakthrough Insights at the Intersection of Ideas, Concepts, and Cultures , 2004 .

[47]  E. Zerhouni.  The NIH Roadmap , 2003, Science.

[48]  Noriko Hara,et al.  An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[49]  K. Brad Wray,et al.  The Epistemic Significance of Collaborative Research , 2002, Philosophy of Science.

[50]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .

[51]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  G. Melin.  Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level , 2000 .

[53]  John H. Zenger,et al.  The New Self-Directed Work Teams: Mastering the Challenge , 1999 .

[54]  A. Edmondson.  Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[55]  L. Perlow.  The Time Famine: Toward a Sociology of Work Time , 1999 .

[56]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[57]  Nabil Amara,et al.  The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research , 1998 .

[58]  Joshua S. Gans,et al.  First Author Conditions , 1998 .

[59]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[60]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[61]  Richard N. Zare.  Knowledge and Distributed Intelligence , 1997, Science.

[62]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[63]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[64]  Brian Dumaine,et al.  The Trouble with Teams. , 1994 .

[65]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity , 1993 .

[66]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[67]  R. McAfee,et al.  OPTIMAL CONTRACTS FOR TEAMS , 1991 .

[68]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property , 1988, Isis.

[69]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[70]  M. Stein.  Creativity and Culture , 1953, Creativity in Art, Religion, and Culture.

[71]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Moral Hazard in Teams , 1982 .

[72]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[73]  T. Allen.  Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[74]  A. E. Cawkell,et al.  CITATIONS, OBSOLESCENCE, ENDURING ARTICLES, AND MULTIPLE AUTHORSHIPS , 1976 .

[75]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[76]  Harriet Zuckerman,et al.  Age, aging, and age structure in science , 1968 .

[77]  D. Price,et al.  Collaboration in an invisible college. , 1966, The American psychologist.