Finite element biomechanics of cervical spine interbody fusion

The biomechanical responses of cervical discectomy coupled with fusion using five types of interbody fusion materials were determined. Titanium core, titanium cage, tricortical iliac crest, tantalum core, and tantalum cage fusion materials were used. Smith-Robinson and Bailey-Badgley procedures were analyzed. A validated three-dimensional anatomically accurate three-segment C4-C5-C6 finite element model of the spine was developed using close-up computed tomography images and cryomicrotome anatomic sections. It was exercised in compression, flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion modes for the intact case and for the two surgeries with five implant materials. External response in terms of the stiffness and angular rotation, and the internal response in terms of the disc and the vertebral stresses were determined. The Smith-Robinson technique resulted in the highest increase in external response under all modes of loading for all implant materials. The Bailey-Badgley technique produced a higher increase in the disc and the vertebral body stresses than the Smith-Robinson technique. Our study assists in a better understanding of the biomechanics by delineating the changes in the extrinsic and intrinsic characteristics of the cervical spine components. Because of the inclusion of three-levels (C4-C5-C6) in the finite element model, it is possible to determine the internal mechanics of the various components at the altered and the unaltered adjacent intervertebral components secondary to these surgical procedures.

[1]  P. McAfee,et al.  Anterior spinal fixators. A biomechanical in vitro study. , 1993, Spine.

[2]  N. Yoganandan,et al.  Finite element applications in human cervical spine modeling. , 1996, Spine.

[3]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Finite element modeling of cervical laminectomy with graded facetectomy. , 1997, Journal of spinal disorders.

[4]  S B Sepic,et al.  Anterior Cervical Fusion for Degenerated or Protruded Discs: A Review of One Hundred Forty-Six Patients , 1984, Spine.

[5]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Fusion Rate and Biomechanical Stiffness of Hydroxylapatite Versus Autogenous Bone Grafts for Anterior Discectomy: An In Vivo Animal Study , 1994, Spine.

[6]  C. Badgley,et al.  Stabilization of the cervical spine by anterior fusion. , 1960, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  A. Sances,et al.  Dynamic Characteristics of the Human Cervical Spine , 1995 .

[8]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Finite element modeling of the C4-C6 cervical spine unit. , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  A Elhagediab,et al.  Biomechanical properties of human lumbar spine ligaments. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  W. Hayes,et al.  Compressive Strength of Autologous and Allogenous Bone Grafts for Thoracolumbar and Cervical Spine Fusion , 1990, Spine.

[11]  R. Robinson,et al.  The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. , 1958, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  G Ray,et al.  Mathematical and finite element analysis of spine injuries. , 1987, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[13]  M. Schlick,et al.  Instrumented artificial spinal cord for human cervical pressure measurement. , 1996, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[14]  D. Cody,et al.  Load-bearing capacity of corticocancellous bone grafts in the spine. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  D. Maiman,et al.  Biomechanical effects of laminectomy on thoracic spine stability. , 1993, Neurosurgery.

[16]  S. P. Chow,et al.  Titanium-mesh block replacement of the intervertebral disk. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  E. Simmons,et al.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. A clinical and biomechanical study with eight-year follow-up. , 1969, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Biomechanical Alterations Induced by Multilevel Cervical Laminectomy , 1995, Spine.

[19]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Functional biomechanics of the thoracolumbar vertebral cortex. , 1988, Clinical biomechanics.

[20]  W C Hayes,et al.  Variations of stiffness and strength along the human cervical spine. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  J. Myklebust,et al.  Biomechanics of Cervical Spine Facetectomy and Fixation Techniques , 1988, Spine.

[22]  A. White,et al.  An experimental study of the immediate load bearing capacity of some commonly used iliac bone grafts. , 1971, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[23]  R. Hardy,et al.  Relief of pain by anterior cervical-spine fusion for spondylosis. A report of sixty-five patients. , 1973, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  E. Stauffer,et al.  Fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine. Instability and recurrent deformity following treatment by anterior interbody fusion. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  S. Alemo-Hammad Use of acrylic in anterior cervical discectomy: technical note. , 1985, Neurosurgery.

[26]  G Ray,et al.  Microtrauma in the lumbar spine: a cause of low back pain. , 1988, Neurosurgery.

[27]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Finite element model of the human lower cervical spine: parametric analysis of the C4-C6 unit. , 1997, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[28]  Y. K. Liu,et al.  Cervical Spine Stiffness and Geometry of the Young Human Male , 1982 .

[29]  A. Sances,et al.  Biomechanics of lumbar pedicle screw/plate fixation in trauma. , 1990, Neurosurgery.

[30]  A. Schultz,et al.  Load-displacement properties of lower cervical spine motion segments. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Cervical vertebral strain measurements under axial and eccentric loading. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.