Supporting solar power in renewables portfolio standards: Experience from the United States
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Aviel Verbruggen,et al. Tradable green certificates in Flanders (Belgium) , 2002 .
[2] K. Porter,et al. Evaluating Experience with Renewables Portfolio Standards in the United States , 2005 .
[3] Paolo Agnolucci. The importance and the policy impacts of post-contractual opportunism and competition in the English and Welsh non-fossil fuel obligation , 2007 .
[4] M. Chupka. Designing Effective Renewable Markets , 2003 .
[5] Karsten Neuhoff,et al. Comparison of feed-in tariff, quota and auction mechanisms to support wind power development , 2008 .
[6] Staffan Jacobsson,et al. Are tradable green certificates a cost-efficient policy driving technical change or a rent-generating machine? Lessons from Sweden 2003–2008 , 2010 .
[7] K. Cory,et al. Renewable Portfolio Standards in the States: Balancing Goals and Rules , 2007 .
[8] K. Palmer,et al. COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY POLICIES , 2005 .
[9] Judith Lipp,et al. Lessons for effective renewable electricity policy from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom , 2007 .
[10] Haitao Yin,et al. Do State Renewable Portfolio Standards Promote In-State Renewable Generation? , 2010 .
[11] Andy S. Kydes,et al. Impacts of a renewable portfolio generation standard on US energy markets , 2007 .
[12] G. Barbose,et al. Renewable Portfolio Standards in the United States - A Status Report with Data Through 2007 , 2008 .
[13] Jeff Deyette,et al. The Projected Impacts of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard , 2007 .
[14] N. Meyer. European schemes for promoting renewables in liberalised markets , 2003 .
[15] Arne Kildegaard. Green certificate markets, the risk of over-investment, and the role of long-term contracts , 2008 .
[16] R. Wiser,et al. Review of International Experience with Renewable Energy Obligation Support Mechanisms - eScholarship , 2005 .
[17] Niels I. Meyer,et al. Danish energy reform: policy implications for renewables , 2003 .
[18] Barry G. Rabe,et al. Race to the Top: The Expanding Role of U.S State Renewable Portfolio Standards , 2010 .
[19] Yannick Perez,et al. The social efficiency of instruments of promotion of renewable energies: A transaction-cost perspective , 2007 .
[20] Philippe Menanteau,et al. Prices versus quantities: choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy , 2003 .
[21] Ken Nagasaka,et al. Comparative analysis of support mechanisms for renewable energy technologies using probability distributions , 2010 .
[22] M. H. Voogt,et al. Cost effects of international trade in meeting EU renewable electricity targets , 2006 .
[23] Atle Midttun,et al. Feed in or certificates, competition or complementarity? Combining a static efficiency and a dynamic innovation perspective on the greening of the energy industry , 2007 .
[24] Catherine Mitchell,et al. Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany , 2006 .
[25] R. Norgaard,et al. Efficiency and sustainability in restructured electricity markets: the renewables portfolio standard , 1996 .
[26] R. Wiser,et al. The Treatment of Renewable Energy Certificates, EmissionsAllowances, and Green Power Programs in State Renewables PortfolioStandards , 2007 .
[27] M. Ringel. Fostering the use of renewable energies in the European Union: the race between feed-in tariffs and green certificates , 2006 .
[28] K. Porter,et al. Does It Have To Be This Hard? Implementing the Nation's Most Complex Renewables Portfolio Standard , 2005 .
[29] Forging Consensus on National Renewables Policy: The Renewables Portfolio Standard and the National Public Benefits Trust Fund , 1999 .
[30] R. Michaels. A National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Politically Correct, Economically Suspect , 2008 .
[31] Volkmar Lauber,et al. REFIT and RPS: options for a harmonised Community framework , 2004 .