Rate of hypoglycemia in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes can be predicted from glycemic variability data.

BACKGROUND We set out to study the relationship between different measures of glycemic variability and the rate of hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Data were pooled from three 24-week insulin trials including patients on twice-daily (BID) insulin lispro mix 75/25 (75% insulin lispro protamine suspension, 25% insulin lispro) (n=805), daily (QD) insulin glargine (n=1,019), insulin lispro protamine suspension (n=353) (QD or BID), and insulin detemir (n=166) (QD or BID), all with continuation of prestudy oral antihyperglycemic medications. Glycemic variability measures were derived from seven-point self-monitored blood glucose profiles. RESULTS At baseline, mean (±SD) age was 56.9±9.7 years, duration of type 2 diabetes was 9.5±6.1 years, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was 8.9±1.1%, and 51.9% were male. Intra-day glucose coefficient of variation (CV), fasting blood glucose, intra-day minimum glucose and inter-day glucose CV at 24 weeks, and intra-day glucose CV at baseline were significantly correlated with the rate of hypoglycemia events between Weeks 12 to 24 (P<0.05 for all measures). CONCLUSIONS Intra-day and inter-day glycemic variability is significantly associated with the risk of hypoglycemia in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes, even after adjusting for mean glucose and HbA1c. The intra-day glycemic variability before starting insulin is significantly associated with the risk of hypoglycemia during insulin treatment, which points at treatment- and patient-related factors mediating this relationship.

[1]  J. DeVries,et al.  A Decrease in Glucose Variability Does Not Reduce Cardiovascular Event Rates in Type 2 Diabetic Patients After Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2011, Diabetes Care.

[2]  M. Carey,et al.  Addition of insulin lispro protamine suspension or insulin glargine to oral type 2 diabetes regimens: a randomized trial , 2010, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[3]  Claude Colette,et al.  The contribution of glucose variability to asymptomatic hypoglycemia in persons with type 2 diabetes. , 2011, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[4]  M. Dharmalingam,et al.  A randomized, treat‐to‐target trial comparing insulin lispro protamine suspension and insulin detemir in insulin‐naive patients with Type 2 diabetes , 2010, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[5]  Richard M Hoffman,et al.  A probabilistic model for predicting hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Diabetes Outcomes in Veterans Study (DOVES). , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  Bruce H. R. Wolffenbuttel,et al.  The DURABLE Trial 24-week Results: Safety and Efficacy of Insulin Lispro Mix 75/25 Versus Insulin Glargine Added to Oral Antihyperglycemic Drugs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes , 2009 .

[7]  J. Hans DeVries,et al.  Glucose variability is associated with intensive care unit mortality* , 2010, Critical care medicine.

[8]  W. F. Taylor,et al.  Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions, a Measure of Diabetic Instability , 1970, Diabetes.

[9]  J. Friedman Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. , 2001 .

[10]  J. Friedman Stochastic gradient boosting , 2002 .

[11]  B. Wolffenbuttel,et al.  DURAbility of Basal Versus Lispro Mix 75/25 Insulin Efficacy (DURABLE) Trial 24-Week Results , 2009, Diabetes Care.

[12]  E. Kilpatrick,et al.  Relating mean blood glucose and glucose variability to the risk of multiple episodes of hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes , 2007, Diabetologia.

[13]  Frits Holleman,et al.  Glucose variability; does it matter? , 2010, Endocrine reviews.

[14]  R. Rizza,et al.  Measurements of Glucose Control , 1987, Diabetes Care.