Structural design for non-linear metallic materials

The material stress–strain behaviour of structural carbon steel may be suitably accurately reflected for design purposes by an idealised elastic, perfectly-plastic material model; such material behaviour lends itself to the concept of section classification. There are, however, a number of structural materials, such as aluminium, stainless steel and some high strength, cold-worked steels, where this idealised model becomes inaccurate due to non-linearity of the stress–strain response below the yield point and considerable strain hardening beyond the yield point. Resulting design methods, developed on the basis of the idealised material behaviour, are necessarily overly conservative. A new method has been developed that utilises a more accurate material model and a continuous measure of cross-section deformation capacity (rather than the discretised system of section classification) to provide more rational and efficient designs. This paper describes the basis for the proposed design method and presents a comparison with results obtained from laboratory testing and those predicted by the current Eurocode approach. The proposed design method offers average increases in member resistances of around 20% over the current Eurocode approach, and a reduction in scatter of the prediction.

[1]  David A. Nethercot,et al.  Compression strength of stainless steel cross-sections , 2006 .

[2]  H. N. Hill Determination of stress-strain relations from "offset" yield strength values , 1944 .

[3]  David A. Nethercot,et al.  Experiments on stainless steel hollow sections—Part 1: Material and cross-sectional behaviour , 2004 .

[4]  David A. Nethercot,et al.  Strength enhancement of the corner regions of stainless steel cross-sections , 2005 .

[5]  Ben Young,et al.  Experimental investigation of cold-formed stainless steel columns , 2002 .

[6]  M. Langseth,et al.  Local buckling of square thin-walled Aluminium extrusions , 1997 .

[7]  S. Timoshenko Theory of Elastic Stability , 1936 .

[8]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  En1999 Eurocode 9 : Design of aluminium structures , 2001 .

[9]  Martin Macdonald,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Stainless Steel Lipped Channels , 2000 .

[10]  Gregory J. Hancock,et al.  Compression Tests of Cold-reduced High Strength Steel Stub Columns , 2002 .

[11]  F. Mazzolani Aluminium Alloy Structures , 1985 .

[12]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Local Buckling of Aluminum Members: Testing and Classification , 2000 .

[13]  Gregory J. Hancock,et al.  Screwed Connection Tests of Thin G550 and G300 Sheet Steels , 1998 .

[14]  Odd Sture Hopperstad,et al.  Ultimate strength of aluminium alloy outstands in compression: experiments and simplified analysis , 1999 .

[15]  Kenneth W. Karren Corner Properties of Cold-Formed Shapes , 1967 .

[16]  Kim J.R. Rasmussen,et al.  Tests of high strength steel columns , 1995 .

[17]  Gregory J. Hancock,et al.  Stainless Steel Tubular Columns - Tests and Design , 1990 .

[18]  Leroy Gardner,et al.  The use of stainless steel in structures , 2005 .

[19]  Ulf Wickström,et al.  Comments on calculation of temperature in fire-exposed bare steel structures in prEN 1993-1-2: Eurocode 3—design of steel structures—Part 1–2: general rules—structural fire design , 2005 .

[20]  W. Ramberg,et al.  Description of Stress-Strain Curves by Three Parameters , 1943 .

[21]  E. Mirambell,et al.  On the calculation of deflections in structural stainless steel beams: an experimental and numerical investigation , 2000 .

[22]  Gregory J. Hancock,et al.  Behavior of Cold-Formed SHS Beam-Columns , 1996 .

[23]  Leroy Gardner,et al.  Development of the use of stainless steel in construction , 2001 .