Binary Relations as a Basis for Rule Induction in Presence of Quantitative Attributes

In original rough set theory, the notion of set approximation has been introduced by using indiscernibility relation defined on the set of objects. In some cases, it is necessary to generalize indiscernibility relation by using some other binary relations. In this paper, we consider similarity relations and tolerance relations among objects. These binary relations are defined from some similarity measures at the level of values of any quantitative attribute. The relations defined by single attribute are aggregated into a global relation at the level of the set of attributes. Then, we construct the lower approximation operation and the upper approximation operation generated by a binary relation and its inverse relation. In order to induce the minimal decision rules used to support the decision task, the nonsimilarity matrix of a decision table with respect to the lower approximation and boundary is defined to construct the nonsimilarity functions which are Boolean functions. The set of ''if … then …'' decision rules is decoded from prime implicants of the Boolean functions. An example is illustrated to demonstrate the application of this approach. Index Terms—binary relations, similarity, tolerance, rough sets, lower and upper approximations

[1]  Tony R. Martinez,et al.  Improved Heterogeneous Distance Functions , 1996, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[2]  D. Vanderpooten Similarity Relation as a Basis for Rough Approximations , 1995 .

[3]  S. Marcus Tolerance rough sets, Čech topologies, learning processes , 1994 .

[4]  Fei-Yue Wang,et al.  Reduction and axiomization of covering generalized rough sets , 2003, Inf. Sci..

[5]  W. Zakowski APPROXIMATIONS IN THE SPACE (U,π) , 1983 .

[6]  William Zhu,et al.  Generalized rough sets based on relations , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[7]  Roman Słowiński,et al.  The Use of Rough Sets and Fuzzy Sets in MCDM , 1999 .

[8]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Tolerance Approximation Spaces , 1996, Fundam. Informaticae.

[9]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Jaroslaw Stepaniuk,et al.  Optimizations of Rough Set Model , 1998, Fundam. Informaticae.

[11]  James A. Mason,et al.  Discrete mathematics for computer science , 1992 .

[12]  Marzena Kryszkiewicz,et al.  Rules in Incomplete Information Systems , 1999, Inf. Sci..

[13]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Relational Interpretations of Neigborhood Operators and Rough Set Approximation Operators , 1998, Inf. Sci..

[14]  Marzena Kryszkiewicz,et al.  Rough Set Approach to Incomplete Information Systems , 1998, Inf. Sci..

[15]  Xu Qing-yuan Generalized Approximation spaces Based on Inverse Serial Relation , 2004 .

[16]  Fei-Yue Wang,et al.  Binary Relation Based Rough Sets , 2006, FSKD.

[17]  Daniel S. Yeung,et al.  Rough approximations on a complete completely distributive lattice with applications to generalized rough sets , 2006, Inf. Sci..

[18]  D. Dubois,et al.  ROUGH FUZZY SETS AND FUZZY ROUGH SETS , 1990 .

[19]  Daniel Vanderpooten,et al.  A Generalized Definition of Rough Approximations Based on Similarity , 2000, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[20]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Constructive and Algebraic Methods of the Theory of Rough Sets , 1998, Inf. Sci..

[21]  William Zhu,et al.  Topological approaches to covering rough sets , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[22]  Qinghua Hu,et al.  Information-preserving hybrid data reduction based on fuzzy-rough techniques , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[23]  Qinghua Hu,et al.  Neighborhood classifiers , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..