Towards an Optimization of Stimulus Parameters for Brain-Computer Interfaces Based on Steady State Visual Evoked Potentials

Efforts to construct an effective brain-computer interface (BCI) system based on Steady State Visual Evoked Potentials (SSVEP) commonly focus on sophisticated mathematical methods for data analysis. The role of different stimulus features in evoking strong SSVEP is less often considered and the knowledge on the optimal stimulus properties is still fragmentary. The goal of this study was to provide insight into the influence of stimulus characteristics on the magnitude of SSVEP response. Five stimuli parameters were tested: size, distance, colour, shape, and presence of a fixation point in the middle of each flickering field. The stimuli were presented on four squares on LCD screen, with each square highlighted by LEDs flickering with different frequencies. Brighter colours and larger dimensions of flickering fields resulted in a significantly stronger SSVEP response. The distance between stimulation fields and the presence or absence of the fixation point had no significant effect on the response. Contrary to a popular belief, these results suggest that absence of the fixation point does not reduce the magnitude of SSVEP response. However, some parameters of the stimuli such as colour and the size of the flickering field play an important role in evoking SSVEP response, which indicates that stimuli rendering is an important factor in building effective SSVEP based BCI systems.

[1]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  Human Perception of Objects: Early Visual Processing of Spatial Form Defined by Luminance, Color, Texture, Motion, and Binocular Disparity , 2001 .

[2]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Towards an independent brain–computer interface using steady state visual evoked potentials , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Steady State Visual Evoked Potentials in the Delta Range (0.5-5 Hz) , 2008, ICONIP.

[5]  D Regan,et al.  A high frequency mechanism which underlies visual evoked potentials. , 1968, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  A. Cichocki,et al.  Steady-state visually evoked potentials: Focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives , 2010, Progress in Neurobiology.

[7]  Paul R. Martin,et al.  Cortical-Like Receptive Fields in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus of Marmoset Monkeys , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  D. Purves,et al.  An empirical explanation of color contrast. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  M. Friedman.  The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of Variance , 1937 .

[11]  P. Suffczynski,et al.  On the Quantification of SSVEP Frequency Responses in Human EEG in Realistic BCI Conditions , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  Ronald M. Aarts,et al.  A Survey of Stimulation Methods Used in SSVEP-Based BCIs , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[13]  R. M. Boynton,et al.  Chromaticity diagram showing cone excitation by stimuli of equal luminance. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[14]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  Discrimination between idle and work states in BCI based on SSVEP , 2010, 2010 2nd International Conference on Advanced Computer Control.

[15]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Luminance and chromatic modulation sensitivity of macaque ganglion cells and human observers. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[16]  Thierry Keller,et al.  Brain-computer interface based on high frequency steady-state visual evoked potentials: A feasibility study , 2009, 2009 4th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[17]  T. Meese,et al.  The influence of fixation points on contrast detection and discrimination of patches of grating: Masking and facilitation , 2009, Vision Research.

[18]  D. Regan,et al.  Recent advances in electrical recording from the human brain , 1975, Nature.

[19]  M. Schilling,et al.  Subject response variability in terms of colour and frequency of capacitive SSVEP measurements , 2012 .

[20]  Simon P. Kelly,et al.  Visual spatial attention control in an independent brain-computer interface , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  R. Shapley,et al.  Light adaptation in the primate retina: Analysis of changes in gain and dynamics of monkey retinal ganglion cells , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[22]  L. Chalupa,et al.  The visual neurosciences , 2004 .

[23]  S. Makeig.  Auditory event-related dynamics of the EEG spectrum and effects of exposure to tones. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  Eduardo Fernández,et al.  Webvision: The Organization of the Retina and Visual System , 1995 .

[25]  Ross Cunnington,et al.  Stimulus specificity of a steady-state visual-evoked potential-based brain–computer interface , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[26]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to statistical pattern recognition (2nd ed.) , 1990 .

[27]  F. Wilcoxon.  Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[28]  A. Holcombe.  Seeing slow and seeing fast: two limits on perception , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  R. Shapley,et al.  The primate retina contains two types of ganglion cells, with high and low contrast sensitivity. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Piotr J. Durka,et al.  User-centered design of brain-computer interfaces: OpenBCI.pl and BCI Appliance , 2012 .

[31]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–computer interface systems: progress and prospects , 2007, Expert review of medical devices.

[32]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[33]  J. Masdeu,et al.  Human Cerebral Activation during Steady-State Visual-Evoked Responses , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Stefan Debener,et al.  Size matters: effects of stimulus size, duration and eccentricity on the visual gamma-band response , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[35]  Pavel Pudil,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 2006 .

[36]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[37]  L. Croner,et al.  Receptive fields of P and M ganglion cells across the primate retina , 1995, Vision Research.