Regional head tissue conductivity estimation for improved EEG analysis

The authors develop a method for estimating regional head tissue conductivities in vivo, by injecting small (1-10 /spl mu/A) electric currents into the scalp, and measuring the potentials at the remaining electrodes of a dense-array electroencephalography net. They first derive analytic expressions for the potentials generated by scalp current injection In a four-sphere model of the human head. They then use a multistart downhill simplex algorithm to find regional tissue conductivities which minimize the error between measured and computed scalp potentials. Two error functions are studied, with similar results. The results show that, despite the low skull conductivity and expected shunting by the scalp, all four regional conductivities can be determined to within a few percent error. The method is robust to the noise levels expected in practice. To obtain accurate results the cerebrospinal fluid must be included In the forward solution, but may be treated as a known parameter in the inverse solution.

[1]  J. G. Webster,et al.  Analysis and Control of the Current Distribution under Circular Dispersive Electrodes , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  K. J. Eriksen,et al.  In Vivo Human Head Regional Conductivity Estimation Using A Three-sphere Model , 1990, [1990] Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  D. A. Driscoll,et al.  EEG electrode sensitivity--an application of reciprocity. , 1969, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[4]  J. Fermaglich.  Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG , 1982 .

[5]  Don M. Tucker,et al.  Development of high-resolution EEG devices , 1999 .

[6]  P D Wolf,et al.  Estimation of tissue resistivities from multiple-electrode impedance measurements. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  D.R. Jackson,et al.  Effect of conductivity uncertainties and modeling errors on EEG source localization using a 2-D model , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  M. Peters,et al.  Volume conduction effects in EEG and MEG. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[10]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[11]  J. Haueisen,et al.  Influence of tissue resistivities on neuromagnetic fields and electric potentials studied with a finite element model of the head , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  D. Geselowitz.  An application of electrocardiographic lead theory to impedance plethysmography. , 1971, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[13]  H. Helmholtz.  Ueber einige Gesetze der Vertheilung elektrischer Ströme in körperlichen Leitern mit Anwendung auf die thierisch‐elektrischen Versuche , 1853 .

[14]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  The Mathematica Book , 1996 .

[15]  David R. Wozny,et al.  The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  The Mathematica book (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[17]  J. Lehr,et al.  A vector derivation useful in impedance plethysmographic field calculations. , 1972, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[18]  K. Foster,et al.  Dielectric properties of tissues and biological materials: a critical review. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[19]  Cees J. Stok,et al.  The influence of model parameters on EEG/MEG single dipole source estimation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  J. C. DE MUNCK,et al.  A Parametric Method to Resolve the Ill‐Posed Nature of the EIT Reconstruction Problem: A Simulation Study , 1999 .