Designing robots for the elderly: appearance issue and beyond.

This paper provides the results of three focus groups organized in the framework of the ROBADOM project, aiming at designing a service type assistive robot for the elderly with mild cognitive impairment living at home. The main objective of these focus groups was to give some recommendations to engineers in charge of the design of the robot's appearance. Results showed that although many humanoid robots were criticized by most participants, some small creative humanoid robots were appreciated. However, beyond the issue of the robot appearance, many ethical and social issues were raised. These focus groups offered an opportunity for participants to discuss the very idea of an assistive robot and to challenge some implicit preconceptions of the roboticists. Finally, we discuss how assistive robots could be designed considering the social context of the elderly and how to implicate the elderly as future end-users in the design process.

[1]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads , 2002, DIS '02.

[2]  J. Forlizzi,et al.  Assistive robotics and an ecology of elders living independently in their homes , 2004 .

[3]  Kai Oliver Arras,et al.  Do we want to share our lives and bodies with robots? A 2000 people survey , 2005 .

[4]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[5]  Rolf Dieter Schraft,et al.  Care-O-bot II—Development of a Next Generation Robotic Home Assistant , 2004, Auton. Robots.

[6]  Joelle Pineau,et al.  Pearl: A Mobile Robotic Assistant for the Elderly , 2002 .

[7]  Amedeo Cesta,et al.  Psychological Implications of Domestic Assistive Technology for the Elderly , 2007, PsychNology J..

[8]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Assistive Robotics and an Ecology of Elders Living Independently in Their Homes , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[10]  Paolo Dario,et al.  MOVAID: a personal robot in everyday life of disabled and elderly people , 1999 .

[11]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  What do people expect from robots? , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[12]  R. D. Schraft,et al.  Care-O-bot/sup TM/: the concept of a system for assisting elderly or disabled persons in home environments , 1998, IECON '98. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (Cat. No.98CH36200).

[13]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[14]  Amedeo Cesta,et al.  RoboCare: an Integrated Robotic System for the Domestic Care of the Elderly , 2003 .

[15]  J. Morris,et al.  Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. , 2001, Archives of neurology.

[16]  J. Broekens,et al.  Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review , 2009 .

[17]  Kazuhiko Kawamura,et al.  Design philosophy for service robots , 1995, 1995 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Intelligent Systems for the 21st Century.

[18]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Gender Representation and Humanoid Robots Designed for Domestic Use , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[19]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[20]  Martha E. Pollack,et al.  Intelligent Technology for an Aging Population: The Use of AI to Assist Elders with Cognitive Impairment , 2005, AI Mag..

[21]  Ferdinando Fornara,et al.  Robots in a domestic setting: a psychological approach , 2005, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[22]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  Child and Adults Perspectives on Robot Appearance , 2005 .

[23]  Robert Sparrow,et al.  In the hands of machines? The future of aged care , 2006, Minds and Machines.