Mutation signature filtering enables high-fidelity RNA structure probing at all four nucleobases with DMS

Chemical probing experiments have transformed RNA structure analysis, enabling high-throughput measurement of base-pairing in living cells. Dimethyl sulfate (DMS) is one of the most widely used structure probing reagents and has played a prominent role in enabling next-generation single-molecule probing analyses. However, DMS has traditionally only been able to probe adenine and cytosine nucleobases. We previously showed that, using appropriate conditions, DMS can also be used to interrogate base-pairing of uracil and guanines in vitro at reduced accuracy. However, DMS remained unable to informatively probe guanines in cells. Here, we develop an improved DMS mutational profiling (MaP) strategy that leverages the unique mutational signature of N1-methylguanine DMS modifications to enable robust, high-fidelity structure probing at all four nucleotides, including in cells. Using information theory, we show that four-base DMS reactivities convey greater structural information than comparable two-base DMS and SHAPE probing strategies. Four-base DMS experiments further enable improved direct base-pair detection by single-molecule PAIR analysis, and ultimately support RNA structure modeling at superior accuracy. Four-base DMS probing experiments are easily performed and will broadly facilitate improved RNA structural analysis in living cells.

[1]  K. Weeks,et al.  Single-Molecule Correlated Chemical Probing: A Revolution in RNA Structure Analysis. , 2023, Accounts of chemical research.

[2]  C. Dean,et al.  In vivo single-molecule analysis reveals COOLAIR RNA structural diversity , 2022, Nature.

[3]  K. Weeks,et al.  Discovery of a large-scale, cell-state-responsive allosteric switch in the 7SK RNA using DANCE-MaP. , 2022, Molecular cell.

[4]  K. Weeks.  SHAPE Directed Discovery of New Functions in Large RNAs. , 2021, Accounts of chemical research.

[5]  M. V. van Hemert,et al.  Genome-scale deconvolution of RNA structure ensembles , 2021, Nature Methods.

[6]  Natacha S. Ogando,et al.  Genome-wide mapping of SARS-CoV-2 RNA structures identifies therapeutically-relevant elements , 2020, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  D. Incarnato,et al.  A novel SHAPE reagent enables the analysis of RNA structure in living cells with unprecedented accuracy , 2020, bioRxiv.

[8]  Christian A. Choe,et al.  Theoretical basis for stabilizing messenger RNA through secondary structure design , 2020, bioRxiv.

[9]  Jamie H. D. Cate,et al.  Structure of the bacterial ribosome at 2 Å resolution , 2020, bioRxiv.

[10]  Rhiju Das,et al.  RNA secondary structure packages evaluated and improved by high-throughput experiments , 2020, bioRxiv.

[11]  B. Graveley,et al.  Sequencing and structure probing of long RNAs using MarathonRT: a next-generation reverse transcriptase. , 2020, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Matthew D. Edwards,et al.  Determination of RNA structural diversity and its role in HIV-1 RNA splicing , 2020, Nature.

[13]  P. Bevilacqua,et al.  Probing RNA structure in vivo. , 2019, Current opinion in structural biology.

[14]  Huiqing Zhou,et al.  Evolution of a reverse transcriptase to map N1-methyladenosine in human messenger RNA , 2019, Nature Methods.

[15]  K. Weeks,et al.  Single-molecule correlated chemical probing reveals large-scale structural communication in the ribosome and the mechanism of the antibiotic spectinomycin in living cells , 2019, PLoS biology.

[16]  Pawel Swietach,et al.  Evidence-based guidelines for controlling pH in mammalian live-cell culture systems , 2019, Communications Biology.

[17]  K. Weeks,et al.  RNA base-pairing complexity in living cells visualized by correlated chemical probing , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Yin Tang,et al.  Genome-wide RNA structurome reprogramming by acute heat shock globally regulates mRNA abundance , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  M. D. Simon,et al.  Carbodiimide reagents for the chemical probing of RNA structure in cells , 2018, RNA.

[20]  P. Bevilacqua,et al.  In vivo RNA structural probing of uracil and guanine base-pairing by 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) , 2018, RNA.

[21]  M. Taoka,et al.  Landscape of the complete RNA chemical modifications in the human 80S ribosome , 2018, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  Razvan Nutiu,et al.  Pervasive Regulatory Functions of mRNA Structure Revealed by High-Resolution SHAPE Probing , 2018, Cell.

[23]  K. Weeks,et al.  Accurate detection of chemical modifications in RNA by mutational profiling (MaP) with ShapeMapper 2 , 2018, RNA.

[24]  P. Bevilacqua,et al.  Glyoxals as in vivo RNA structural probes of guanine base-pairing , 2018, RNA.

[25]  M. Rutenberg-Schoenberg,et al.  Interpreting Reverse Transcriptase Termination and Mutation Events for Greater Insight into the Chemical Probing of RNA. , 2017, Biochemistry.

[26]  Sarah M. Assmann,et al.  Structure-seq2: sensitive and accurate genome-wide profiling of RNA structure in vivo , 2017, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  D. Bartel,et al.  Widespread Influence of 3′-End Structures on Mammalian mRNA Processing and Stability , 2017, Cell.

[28]  K. Weeks,et al.  Packaged and Free Satellite Tobacco Mosaic Virus (STMV) RNA Genomes Adopt Distinct Conformational States. , 2017, Biochemistry.

[29]  K. Weeks,et al.  Direct identification of base-paired RNA nucleotides by correlated chemical probing , 2017, RNA.

[30]  J. Weissman,et al.  DMS-MaPseq for genome-wide or targeted RNA structure probing in vivo , 2016, Nature Methods.

[31]  D. Bartel,et al.  RNA G-quadruplexes are globally unfolded in eukaryotic cells and depleted in bacteria , 2016, Science.

[32]  Walter N. Moss,et al.  Probing Xist RNA Structure in Cells Using Targeted Structure-Seq , 2015, PLoS genetics.

[33]  Kevin M Weeks,et al.  Selective 2′-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension and mutational profiling (SHAPE-MaP) for direct, versatile and accurate RNA structure analysis , 2015, Nature Protocols.

[34]  Kevin Y. Yip,et al.  Improved prediction of RNA secondary structure by integrating the free energy model with restraints derived from experimental probing data , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[35]  Christopher A. Lavender,et al.  In-cell SHAPE reveals that free 30S ribosome subunits are in the inactive state , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Structural imprints in vivo decode RNA regulatory mechanisms , 2015, Nature.

[37]  Nikolay V. Dokholyan,et al.  Single-molecule correlated chemical probing of RNA , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Steven Busan,et al.  RNA motif discovery by SHAPE and mutational profiling (SHAPE-MaP) , 2014, Nature Methods.

[39]  Sean R Eddy,et al.  Computational analysis of conserved RNA secondary structure in transcriptomes and genomes. , 2014, Annual review of biophysics.

[40]  K. Weeks,et al.  Ribosome RNA assembly intermediates visualized in living cells. , 2014, Biochemistry.

[41]  Manolis Kellis,et al.  Genome-wide probing of RNA structure reveals active unfolding of mRNA structures in vivo , 2013, Nature.

[42]  D. Mathews,et al.  Accurate SHAPE-directed RNA secondary structure modeling, including pseudoknots , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Rhiju Das,et al.  Quantitative dimethyl sulfate mapping for automated RNA secondary structure inference. , 2012, Biochemistry.

[44]  K. Weeks,et al.  The mechanisms of RNA SHAPE chemistry. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[45]  N. Pace,et al.  Solution structure of RNase P RNA. , 2011, RNA.

[46]  K. Weeks.  Advances in RNA structure analysis by chemical probing. , 2010, Current opinion in structural biology.

[47]  David H. Mathews,et al.  RNAstructure: software for RNA secondary structure prediction and analysis , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[48]  Marcela Dávila López,et al.  Conserved and variable domains of RNase MRP RNA , 2009, RNA biology.

[49]  C. Oubridge,et al.  Crystal structure of human spliceosomal U1 snRNP at 5.5 Å resolution , 2009, Nature.

[50]  Eric Westhof,et al.  The Dynamic Landscapes of RNA Architecture , 2009, Cell.

[51]  D. Mathews,et al.  Accurate SHAPE-directed RNA structure determination , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  Joan L. Slonczewski,et al.  pH of the Cytoplasm and Periplasm of Escherichia coli: Rapid Measurement by Green Fluorescent Protein Fluorimetry , 2007, Journal of bacteriology.

[53]  K. Weeks,et al.  RNA structure analysis at single nucleotide resolution by selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation and primer extension (SHAPE). , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[54]  Thomas A Steitz,et al.  The structural basis of large ribosomal subunit function. , 2002, Annual review of biochemistry.

[55]  Nan Yu,et al.  The Comparative RNA Web (CRW) Site: an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and other RNAs , 2002, BMC Bioinformatics.

[56]  D. Bartel,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of tmRNA secondary structure. , 1996, RNA.

[57]  J. Ebel,et al.  Probing the structure of RNAs in solution. , 1987, Nucleic acids research.

[58]  T. D. Schneider,et al.  Information content of binding sites on nucleotide sequences. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.

[59]  W. Gilbert,et al.  Chemical probes for higher-order structure in RNA. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  P. D. Lawley,et al.  Methylation of ribonucleic acid by the carcinogens dimethyl sulphate, N-methyl-N-nitrosourea and N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine. Comparisons of chemical analyses at the nucleoside and base levels. , 1972, The Biochemical journal.

[61]  K. Weeks,et al.  SHAPE Probing Reveals Human rRNAs Are Largely Unfolded in Solution , 2019 .

[62]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  RNA SHAPE analysis in living cells. , 2013, Nature chemical biology.